Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miss. defeats life at conception ballot initiative
Associated Press ^ | Nov.8, 2011 | EMILY WAGSTER PETTUS

Posted on 11/08/2011 7:53:00 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY

JACKSON, Miss. (AP) -- Mississippi voters shot down a referendum Tuesday that would have effectively banned abortions in the state, rejecting an initiative that said life begins at conception.

The so-called personhood initiative was rejected by more than 55 percent of voters. If it had passed, it was virtually assured of drawing legal challenges because it conflicts with the Supreme Court's 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that established a legal right to abortion.

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortions; dehumanization; dehumanizing; moralabsolutes; proabortion; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-155 next last
To: Strategerist

“I assume you’re lugging the cooler full of embryos out of the building”

Lol, I’m getting a kick out of your examples.


81 posted on 11/08/2011 9:07:05 PM PST by independent in tx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.”

“No State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

That is the supreme law of the land.


82 posted on 11/08/2011 9:07:13 PM PST by EternalVigilance ("Si vis pacem, para bellum." "If you wish for peace, prepare for war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: independent in tx

So true about the wording. I must have heard at least 1/2 dozen or more different interpretations. Some were quite extreme and silly. The discussions of what 26 meant divided friends and families. I even heard someone say that they wondered if this would legally make them 9 months older.

On a positive note, I was happy to see voter id pass. Will miss Haley but think Phil will do good.


83 posted on 11/08/2011 9:07:30 PM PST by realmagnolia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Wait for a proposition that mentions sperm before torching your scarecrows.


84 posted on 11/08/2011 9:10:05 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (ya don't tug on Superman's cape/ya don't spit into the wind--and ya don't speak well of Mitt to Jim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

And we hope to eventually argue the court system into accepting it literally.

In the meantime, provisions that guarantee a greater degree of recognition than known before, even if less than the ideal on Mt. Sinai, are now potentially in play. Shall we take our marbles and go home because not enough people want to play on Mt. Sinai yet?


85 posted on 11/08/2011 9:12:08 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (ya don't tug on Superman's cape/ya don't spit into the wind--and ya don't speak well of Mitt to Jim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
Damn. If that can’t pass in Miss. it can’t pass.

I had no idea that God allowed the voters of Mississippi to determine when life began....I searched through the bible and no where did I find "God formed a baby in the womb and called on Mississipians to tell Him when its life began".....maybe I should look under the third book of Mississippi?????or not

86 posted on 11/08/2011 9:14:52 PM PST by terycarl (lurking, but well informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Since I haven’t answered?

My answer is thats a stupid question. First off, I have 2 good arms.

There is nothing in that proposal that would do anything like what you and the other aborticians are theorizing.


87 posted on 11/08/2011 9:15:23 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
Damn. If that can’t pass in Miss. it can’t pass.

I had no idea that God allowed the voters of Mississippi to determine when life began....I searched through the bible and no where did I find "God formed a baby in the womb and called on Mississipians to tell Him when its life began".....maybe I should look under the third book of Mississippi?????or not

88 posted on 11/08/2011 9:17:00 PM PST by terycarl (lurking, but well informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Some of these scenarios sound like the high school question, debating the situation of a lifeboat containing “one too many” people to support — so who goes overboard?

Actual decisions are made to sacrifice human lives for the lives (or freedoms) of others all the time; it happens every time we take military action, for example. Ostensibly the lives lost in the invasion of Afghanistan are worth it to prevent the lives lost in future terrorist attacks on the US, that could have potentially been based in Afghanistan.

The point is, for a true supporter of the Mississippi initiative the 10,000 frozen embryos vs. 1 10 year old girl scenario SHOULDN'T be a puzzle; it should be an obvious choice to save the 10,000 "persons."

If you reject the scenario as artificial, consider this: in practical, real world terms, if we support the Mississippi initiative, we clearly should be devoting the SAME effort, manpower, and funding to protecting fertilized eggs and investigating and documenting their deaths, as we do to protecting little girls and investigating and documenting their deaths.

89 posted on 11/08/2011 9:17:11 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
yes...it was unfortunately poorly worded..a shame because a properly termed amendment could pass there

whites in MS voted around 90% GOP

and a fair numbers of ordinarily Democrat voting blacks would vote for a well written amendment

the pro abortion crowd really capitalized on the fears about:

in vitro

birth control

morning after

tubal pregnancy

rape and incest

and it worked..

sadly

almost no abortions take place in MS anyhow but if anything like this does ever pass there then it could start things positive

90 posted on 11/08/2011 9:19:39 PM PST by wardaddy (Ethnonationalist...I'll cop to that....Suicide of a Superpower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Your scenario is right out of "The Handmaid's Tale" and utterly ludicrous. Law enforcement is never going there. Ever. And anyone who says that's where things are heading is a liar, plain and simple.

I'd bet money, marbles and chalk that when Nixon proposed and Congress created the EPA, we'd have been told they would never try to regulate CO2 as a pollutant, in equally determinate terms. Don't underestimate the ability of government bureaucracy to get stupid.

91 posted on 11/08/2011 9:20:24 PM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: terycarl

I’d believe the third book of Mississippi before something that came from the third book of Mormon... just kidding! just kidding! (Duck’n & runn’n)

Can’t we achieve some working agreements here to make big inroads into abortion without accusing those who ultimately would want something more or less of being monsters????

Look, you got 45% of Mississippians to agree on THIS. You’d have also to deal with Roe v. Wade in a rational manner, which that decision itself opens the door to because it confessed it was not possible to determine when life began.


92 posted on 11/08/2011 9:20:58 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (ya don't tug on Superman's cape/ya don't spit into the wind--and ya don't speak well of Mitt to Jim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
single cell zygote the same level of protection as a baby in the 2nd or 3rd trimester. That just the way it is, whether or not we agree with it. 2 cells, 4 cells, 8 cells.....it's still the same person
93 posted on 11/08/2011 9:22:23 PM PST by terycarl (lurking, but well informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
OK, no more scenarios. Let's play "Which picture has more people in it?"



Your answer to this one?

94 posted on 11/08/2011 9:22:41 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Which one was your dinner?


95 posted on 11/08/2011 9:23:39 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

It worked. Just read this thread.


96 posted on 11/08/2011 9:24:13 PM PST by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

“if we support the Mississippi initiative, we clearly should be devoting the SAME effort, manpower, and funding to protecting fertilized eggs and investigating and documenting their deaths, as we do to protecting little girls and investigating and documenting their deaths.”

This is the best point made. Those who think those extreme examples couldn’t happen, should digest this.


97 posted on 11/08/2011 9:24:46 PM PST by independent in tx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Strategerist wrote:

“Burning building - you can carry out an unconscious 10 year old girl, or a cooler full of 10,000 frozen embryos, but not both. Which do you pick?”

**************************************************************

I don’t get the point you’re trying to make here. First, a frozen embryo has not been fertilized by male sperm, so it’s not the same thing as a pregnancy. Second, you could just as easily ask the question:

“Burning building - you can carry out an unconscious 10 year old girl, or an unconscious 1-year-old baby boy, but not both.”

So let’s just say I were to rescue the 1-year-old infant boy in this situation because he happened to be the most accessible. Since I can’t rescue both children, does this mean I value the lives of 10-year-olds or girls any less???


98 posted on 11/08/2011 9:25:10 PM PST by DestroyLiberalism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

very true


99 posted on 11/08/2011 9:26:25 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Sad


100 posted on 11/08/2011 9:26:35 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson