Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cable cos. to offer $9.95 broadband for poor homes
AP ^ | November 9, 2011 | PETER SVENSSON

Posted on 11/09/2011 8:57:24 AM PST by ConservativeStatement

NEW YORK (AP) — Cable companies said Wednesday that they will offer Internet service for $9.95 per month to homes with children that are eligible for free school lunches.

The offer will start next summer and is part of an initiative the Federal Communications Commission cobbled together to get more U.S. homes connected to broadband.

One third, or about 35 million homes, don't have broadband. That affects people's ability to educate themselves and find and apply for jobs, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: broadband; cable; comcrap; czar; fc; freecheese; internet; technology; twc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
And it will be 100% legit.
1 posted on 11/09/2011 8:57:26 AM PST by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

I want special treatment too. I am calling my cable company and telling them I am poor and want $9.95 broadband.


2 posted on 11/09/2011 8:58:54 AM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

bread & internets


3 posted on 11/09/2011 9:01:04 AM PST by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many conservative Christians my age out there? __ Click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

“The offer will start next summer and is part of an initiative the Federal Communications Commission cobbled together to get more U.S. homes connected to broadband.”

Another GSE, another intrusion into free enterprise, another million votes for the Dhims.


4 posted on 11/09/2011 9:01:30 AM PST by jessduntno ("They say the world has become too complex for simple answers... they are wrong." - RR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

Children who are “eligible for free school lunches” should have NO TV.

TV and and the entertainment morass is actually a distraction and burden to such kids.


5 posted on 11/09/2011 9:02:08 AM PST by PGR88 (I'm so open-minded my brains fell out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

and thier legitimate customers will pay for it.


6 posted on 11/09/2011 9:03:41 AM PST by Rightly Biased (Do you know how awkward it is to have a political argument with a naked man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement
I don't have a problem with it until the next time I call them and ask why is my bill so high.
7 posted on 11/09/2011 9:07:08 AM PST by tobyhill (Obama, The Biggest Thief In American History)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rightly Biased

Backdoor Socialism


8 posted on 11/09/2011 9:08:04 AM PST by quesera (We are definitely so screwed!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Me too. My kids get free school lunch, cause I PAY FOR IT.


9 posted on 11/09/2011 9:09:56 AM PST by cyclotic (People who live withing their means are increasingly being forced to pay for people who didn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement
We the workers will pay for it too....I give up.
10 posted on 11/09/2011 9:12:10 AM PST by ladyvet ( I would rather have Incitatus then the asses that are in congress today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

One third, or about 35 million homes, don’t have broadband. That affects people’s ability to educate themselves and find and apply for jobs, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said.
_______________________________________

Gollies

Whats wrong with those people ???

I never used the Internet to “educate myself and find and apply for jobs”

Why do they need it ???

I used newspapers and books...

Since these are people who must be sitting at home since they dont have jobs, whats the betting they wont just watch porn, play games or gamble online ???

Plus if they do look for jobs and go to work what happens then ???

Will they then be charged the regular rates ???


11 posted on 11/09/2011 9:14:15 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

The parasites get another slice of our hard earned dollars. Isn’t Socialism grand? I am planning to shrug in the near future.


12 posted on 11/09/2011 9:16:36 AM PST by sand88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

How much will it cost the “non-poor” homes to give it to them? Somebody’s going to have to pay for it.


13 posted on 11/09/2011 9:16:53 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

Note that this reduce-price broadband is also (significantly) reduced speed over the normally-priced plans.

My only problem with this is the means testing they put on it; instead, I’d just prefer they offer this low tier of service to ANY subscriber who is ok with the slower speeds.


14 posted on 11/09/2011 9:18:46 AM PST by kevkrom (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

they just need quicker access to porn.


15 posted on 11/09/2011 9:19:37 AM PST by Rightly Biased (Do you know how awkward it is to have a political argument with a naked man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
I’d just prefer they offer this low tier of service to ANY subscriber who is ok with the slower speeds.

I didn't read the article but they're probably offering 7.68 Mbit DSL or 1 Mbit Cable broadband? My own DSL is $14.95/month from Frontier. Yeah, $9.95 would be better yet.

16 posted on 11/09/2011 9:24:08 AM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture (Could be worst in 40 years))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Rightly Biased

“they just need quicker access to porn.”

And stupid youtube videos and Facebook.


17 posted on 11/09/2011 9:25:16 AM PST by No Socialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

So when do the taxpayers get the bill for the computers they need to connect to this? Heck, the “poor” already get free cell phones.


18 posted on 11/09/2011 9:26:05 AM PST by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Socialist

10.00 a month doesn’t cover the truck roll and the cost of the modem someone is gonna pay


19 posted on 11/09/2011 9:28:45 AM PST by Rightly Biased (Do you know how awkward it is to have a political argument with a naked man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: steve86

Meant .768 Mbit lol


20 posted on 11/09/2011 9:31:37 AM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture (Could be worst in 40 years))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson