Posted on 11/10/2011 11:04:21 AM PST by ferrgus
Donna Donella, one of the five women caught up in the charges of sexual harassment being leveled against Herman Cain, said Wednesday she is not an “accuser.”
“I take issue with being labeled in the media as 'Accuser No. 5,' ” she said in an interview with The Washington Times-affiliated “America's Morning News” radio program. “I want to make it very clear that Herman Cain never sexually harassed me, I’ve never accused Herman Cain of sexually harassing me. The only reason that I came forward is because I saw behavior, the one day that I met him … that was consistent with the pattern of his behavior described by his four actual accusers.”
“I can’t put a finger on it, but as most women will tell you, you kind of have a sense when men are on the up and up and when there are men who may not be. I had that feeling and so did my colleague, and that’s why she jumped in and said, ‘Oh, let’s all go to dinner.’ “
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
That leaves...
One accuser who called her 13-year-old son to ask his advice on whether to go to the media -- and who's being paraded around by Gloria Allred in front of any news show that'll have her
One accuser whose biggest complaint was that Herman compared her height to that of his wife (and who tried to extract another settlement at the next job she went to after her settlement with the NRA)
One non-accuser who says nothing happened during her dinner with Mr. Cain
And two anonymous "accusers" from whom we don't have any specific accusations.
And all of it, interestingly, coming from Chicago. Hmmmmmm...
But we need 9!!!
WAIT a minute...!!!!!!!!! ‘Cain woman’??? WTF is THAT!!
These two statements are contradictory:
—Ms. Donella, who said she is not a Democrat and “not a part of any political machine,” said she had hoped to remain anonymous when she came forward with her story about her interaction with Mr. Cain. After her name was included in a news story on the Cain sexual harassment allegations, she decided to speak to “America’s Morning News” and also did a Wednesday morning interview on ABC.—
And this:
“I didn’t ask for 15 minutes of fame. I certainly didn’t want 15 minutes of fame like this...”
Based on the first quote, I can only respond to the second quote thusly, “The hell you didn’t.”
Some men flirt. Sometimes we like it and sometimes we don’t. Grow up, little girls.
I love it when a good liberal plan falls apart! Most delicious is it’s happening while everyone is still paying attention!
Cindie
“WAIT a minute...!!!!!!!!! ‘Cain woman’??? WTF is THAT!!”
The freaks have been calling Cain a “black sexual predator” of “our blonde women” so he must OWN them now. LOL.
She is obviously confusing this with Mr. Cain’s little-known cameo appearance in the 1979 movie “Animal House”...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaJhLyDhsgc
/sarc
perhaps someone should look into whose tax records Rahm has been reviewing.
And just why it seems that the Dems are blocking for Romney.
All true, but that is not how it is being presented by the MSM.
I was talking to others who have been only exposed to the ‘TV’s’ version of the incidents, and they have been blindly hypnotized to believe that
“they KNOW he did it”
but... they question why it is being brought up now. So at least there is some hope in Fairyland where the TV people live.
In other words, she had ZERO evidence he was hitting on her or anyone. It was just a VAGUE FEELING that she can't even put a finger on.
Isn’t this the woman who had to pay for her own dinner including an expensive bottle of wine?
Yes. In reality we have 2 accusers (not 5, 4, or 3), one of whom we are still waiting to hear the salacious details from, and both have “histories” to put it mildly.
Then there’s this Lunch Lady who used her womanly superpowers on a guy she just met knew to discern that he was an evil creep. In a strange twist, she wines and dines with him anyway.
Yeah right.
I bet the bitch has been married more than once and I am sure she has been rolled around the bed more than once by a lot more than one individual. I once had a woman that had been married five times tell me she was really good at judging people.
Whoa boy! They’re scared now. Cain’s got a real lawyer and there could actually be real consequences for this crap.
—Isn’t this the woman who had to pay for her own dinner including an expensive bottle of wine?—
Not exactly. We only know that Cain did not pay for it. We don’t know who did. But considering the event, it is naturally assumed that some company’s expense account covered it. It’s how it works.
That woman is a sexist. She said he didn’t sexually harrass her, but I can tell the type. She may even be a racist.
All you men out there should be outraged and complain about this woman.
When we were given sensitivity indoctrination, we were told that there was no difference between an accusation from the recipient of harassment and one from a person who was offended because he had overheard the harassment even though the intended hearer was not offended. That is, being offended was the important point.
Actually, one of those "anonymous accusers" appears to be Bialek, so scratch one more "accuser" off the list.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.