Posted on 11/15/2011 2:56:06 PM PST by Kaslin
I AM thinking, that’s why I’m voting for Cain over the other two RINOs.
Four governors—Perry, Johnson, Huntsman, and Romney. Not that much to choose from. One ex-speaker.
I realize that you have interpreted it in a negative light. I was interested in the 2 questions I asked. But of course you are free to disregrd them.
Why are you knocking Newt? What happened to knocking Perry?
As for Cain, I was against him as soon as I found out he was selling a sales tax.
There, fixed it for you!!!
Indeed.
Or you can get raw with these strings. Either way, the violin is sweet yet lethal.
Do it!
p>A Summary Of Herman Cains BIO
Mathematician for the Navy, where he worked on missile ballistics (making him a rocket scientist); Computer systems analyst for Coca-Cola; VP of Corporate Data Systems and Services for Pillsbury; Business Manager for 400 Burger King restaurants He learned the business from the ground up to turn the poorest performers into three the best performers in three years); CEO and owner of Godfathers Pizza; Chairman of the National Restaurant Association; Adviser to the Federal Reserve System. Chairman of the Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank. Writer and public speaker. WSB-Atlanta Radio Host, Associate Minister, faithful husband, and father.
Herman Cain did all this starting from rock bottom! He is more than able to be President.
‘Funny thing is that Cain is still one of only two people I trust in this race. Michele Bachmann is the other. If Cain is as smart as I think he is, theyll be working together on a daily basis.’
This is the most important quality. One can always surround oneself with competent advisers.
.’the liars, ambulance chasers, agenda-driven bloggers, Democrats, establishment Republicans and Marxist media sources keep throwing stonesbut they simply bounce offand Cain keeps rolling on toward Iowa...’
This should be Cains opening line in his speeches.
Because I have been stunned to discover what a charlatan Newt is about his newly-claimed "conservatism", when his part shows him to be as RINO as Romney - at best - and one-world Progressive at worst. It's a real mess.
Check out Ron Paul. You two might be a perfect match.
>> THE ROMNEY-BOTS AND PAUL-IN-ISTA POSTERS HERE
I was thinking closet Obama supporters.
Here’s the question I continue to ask every time someone makes the “relevant” experience argument. The Constitution (the document conservatives are supposed to want to return to following) says the only requirements for president are to be over 35 and a citizen. Yet, I constantly hear qualifiers. Were the founders lacking in knowledge? Were they wrong? Perhaps we should seriously consider changing what’s evidently a living document to include a list of requirements for the top job.
Cindie
>> THE ROMNEY-BOTS AND PAUL-IN-ISTA POSTERS HERE I was thinking closet Obama supporters.
LOL! Thanks, needed a good laugh!
That would not surprise me at all as I don't doubt there are some phony, pretend Liberals in sheep's clothing, who sign on just to make mischief and create dissension.
THAT SAID, THIS NEEDS REPEATING:
It is natural there will be differing opinions as to who one supports and I've seen it change from Palin (I was one) to Bachman (Ditto) to Perry (Yep, guilty again) to Cain (count me one of them) yet there are some others who support Romney or Paul.
That said, how's about a little "TRUTH IN ADVERTISING" or better yet, "SMEARING?"
If someone is going to keep posting (and doing our enemy's work for them, as the Left and Media in concert simply want to DESTROY whomever they believe will be the strongest and most likely to beat their Dear Leader) negative articles about ANY Candidate, how about you have enough character of your convictions to at the same time, FESS UP as to who(m) you support, rather than be like the drive-by-media and take your "shot" and run and hide???
Come on, "Man up" whether you stand or sit down to pee!!!
Sorry ladies, din't mean to pick on you, as I know most of you have bigger stones than some of our wuss, males.
Are you suggesting those are the only facts you consider in choosing a candidate? Didn't think so.
Rep. Paul has his good points. But he’s not an executive. He doesn’t even warrant consideration from me.
Am I supposed to be impressed? I’m not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.