BREAK TRANSCRIPTPosted on 11/15/2011 2:56:06 PM PST by Kaslin
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Unless you have been sleeping in a cave out there, you probably have heard by now that Herman Cain paused for up to 11 seconds in responding to a question put to him by the editors of Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. It was a question about Libya, and because of this 11 second pause, Herman Cain is not fit to be president. Because, you see, you only get ten seconds on a quiz show, and Herman Cain took 11 seconds out there. So he's definitely finished. But it's funny now. It seem like our watchdog news media are doing their level best to prove that Mr. Cain is not only not "clean," sexual harassment charges, but now that he's not "articulate." We had Joe Bite Me out there saying about Obama, "Finally we got a clean, articulate black guy on our side!"
Now they're trying to show that Herman Cain's neither clean nor articulate. Our media brothers are attempting this.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Herman Cain, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. This is all over their website. This video has gone viral. It's an editorial board meeting where they're interviewing Cain about things, and one of the members of the editorial board says, "So you agree with President Obama on Libya, or not?"
CAIN: Okay, Libya. (11 second pause) President Obama supported the uprising, correct? President Obama called for the removal of Khadafy. To make sure we're talking about the same thing before I say yes, I agree, or no, I didn't agree. I do not agree with the way he handled it for the following reason. No, that's a different one. I gotta go back and see -- got all this stuff twirling around in my head.
RUSH: Okay, now, there were three pauses in there. We edited them all out. I made sure the first pause you heard, that's why we stopped for 11 seconds, there was an 11 second pause. The pauses in his answer are the story. The pauses indicate he doesn't know what he's talking about. He's having to fake it. He's having to try to think on the fly 'cause he doesn't really know. It's foreign policy, the narrative is he's an idiot, he doesn't know a thing about foreign policy and doesn't care about it and so they thought they had him nailed with this. And then they asked him later on about collective bargaining. "Would you favor collective bargaining for federal employees?"
CAIN: They already have it, don't they? Yeah. They -- they already have collect --
REPORTER: No, they don't.
CAIN: They have unions.
REPORTER: They have unions.
CAIN: They have unions, okay.
REPORTER: But they don't have the same bargaining --
CAIN: They don't have the same bargaining powers. Here again, collective bargaining I support as long as it doesn't create an undue burden on the state, the government, the taxpayer, and this sort of thing. That's the issue.
RUSH: Now, he said that twice. He said, "Well, I'm for collective bargaining as long as it's not collective hijacking, and as long as it doesn't create an undue burden on the state." Again, the attempt here is to make it sound as though he doesn't know what he's talking about. But on Libya, when you listen to the whole interview, the whole question and answer, he ended up getting Libya right. His biggest mistake was admitting he was having a hard time focusing. He shouldn't have said that in front of the enemy, the enemy being the editorial board, but he said I'm having a hard time focusing here.
Federal workers do have collective bargaining. Some of them do. Some federal workers do have collective bargaining. It's not the same as in some of the states. For example, the air traffic controllers do have collective bargaining over their wages, and some federal workers only have collective bargaining rights over work conditions. Some of them have collective bargaining rights over other aspects, but not wages. It's all over the ballpark. It is a mistake to say that federal workers, as the editorial board member here said, don't have collective bargaining rights; some of them do.
In any event, substantively Cain was right. Substantively Cain got it right on collective bargaining for federal unionized workers, and the editors got it wrong. And even the Journal Sentinel article that accompanies the video eventually admitted that Cain got it right in his answer and their editors had it wrong. But no matter, they are attempting to portray via the video here a slow, ignorant, uninformed, unsure of himself candidate who really is just out classed and is just totally out of his league. And the video, under that impression, under those auspices, has gone viral, and that's the thought accompanying it with everybody who sends it out.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Herman Cain's laughing all this off. They ran into him, some media camera crew, this morning. "Mr. Cain, Mr. Cain, what about the fact that you looked like such an idiot answering your question on Libya?" He looked into the camera, he smiled real big, and he said, "9-9-9," and continued to sip his coffee in his cowboy hat and walked off. Here's Herman Cain. This is last night in Green Bay, Lambeau Field, Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain speaking to reporters about this pause that he took during a question in an interview with the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel editorial board.
CAIN: I mean, they asked me a question about Libya, and I paused so I could gather my thoughts. You know, it's really complimentary when people start documenting my pauses. You know, it's one thing to document every word. It was a pause! That's all it was. Good grief.
RUSH: Yeah, and you have to see it. There's a bottle of water there; they ask him a question; and he pushes the bottle of water away, shifts in his chair for a while, and they're saying, "See, he looks uncomfortable, totally out of his league," and, look, folks, this video is being sent around even by conservative websites as, "Okay, that's it. All right, we've had it, Cain's finished, it's over with. This has nothing to do with sexual harassment, let's just finally admit it, he doesn't have the slightest clue what he's saying or what he's doing when it comes to foreign policy. Could we please move on?" And everybody that's sending this video out, be they left or right, is prefacing it with that same message: "Hey, wait 'til you see this idiot." So that's gone viral in the context of Herman Cain's a fool, an absolute idiot. It's just the latest hit piece started by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel editors that I guess they'd have to chalk up as a success. That's the context under which it has gone out.
We'll get to your phone calls here in just a second. One more audio sound bite. I just want to go back. June 5th, 2008, Bristol, Virginia, campaign event, Senator Barack Obama talking about Iraq.
OBAMA: What they'll say is, well, it costs too much money, but, you know what? It would cost about -- it -- it -- it would cost about the same as what we would spend -- over the course of ten years, it would cost what it cost us -- it -- huh -- all right, okay. We're going to. The -- it would cost us about the same as it would cost for about -- hold on one second. I can't hear myself. But I'm glad you're fired up, though. I'm glad.
RUSH: Thirty-eight seconds. Thirty-eight seconds of sheer, total idiocy, confusion, ignorance, whatever you want to say. Thirty-eight seconds of it. I'll stack that up against anything Rick Perry stumbled on or Herman Cain. That's June 5th of 2008. And, by the way, that's right in the midst of Operation Chaos. The Democrat nomination process, primary process is not yet concluded at that point. They're asking about Iraq. He hasn't the slightest idea, he hasn't a clue.
END TRANSCRIPT
Yeah, that is what I saw and posted about on another thread. Ouch. Not good.
Rush is so full of crap on this.
I caught Rush playing this 38 seconds of Obama’s mind leaving the stage, this morning.
It was painful even for one who has had bad feelings about Obama before he became a $inator.
“RUSH: Thirty-eight seconds. Thirty-eight seconds of sheer, total idiocy, confusion, ignorance, whatever you want to say. Thirty-eight seconds of it. I’ll stack that up against anything Rick Perry stumbled on or Herman Cain. That’s June 5th of 2008. And, by the way, that’s right in the midst of Operation Chaos. The Democrat nomination process, primary process is not yet concluded at that point. They’re asking about Iraq. He hasn’t the slightest idea, he hasn’t a clue.”
Herman hit a small bump in the road but the media and the obama charactor assasination crew are blowing it up big much like this...........not
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zc6wQMVHhic
Translation: We don’t like his message!
Why do you say this? Had you already concluded that Cain is unfit, or have you already chosen another candidate?
Eff the LSM
At least he is a real conservative. The poor NewtBots on FR are about to be reminded of why Newt aligned himself with Nancy Pelosi and John Kerry on global warming. Those were NOT "stupid mistakes" - that is who Newt Gingrich REALLY is - an Alvin Toffler, world government, "Third Wave" Progressive.
I say it because it wasn’t just an 11 second pause. It was a train wreck in slow motion.
I’ve watched it all and it has not phased me. It is not sterling, spit and polished politics. but Herman Cain is not that.
He considered his answer and then gave it.
Cain is continuing to do well despite this kind of thing because a bunch of us...and growing...trust him and like his style and his positions.
When compared to the cheesy, sleezy lawyer and people Allred is bringing forward, it is obvious to anyone with any sense that it is a hatchet job and not too be believed.
When a man you trust and like is being attacked like this...you rally around and support even more...and that is what has happened.
I expect he will continue to do well.
Despite whatever mis-statements he sometimes makes, we trust him to check it out, get it right, and then move on. We like that he is not a spit and polished pols and believe him to be an honest, down to earth American we can trust...and that’s it in a nutshell.
He will have to gaffe a whole lot worse, and any allegations will have to be backed up by indisputable proof for him to lose my support.
The video was backup for a for-print interview, to ensure accuracy of the transcript.
Cain wasn’t acting for the camera; he was working on a reasonable response that he knew would appear in print.
THAT is the “context.”
I hate the media, they knew exactly what they were doing...the question is, ‘whose orders are they following?’
So you want slick? Vote for Romney, then. He’s slick.
I'm not a Cain fan...but think folks...
None of the other candidates would have allowed the discussion to be taped. Just a rookie mistake. Cain is beginning to self destruct...and I was a donor.
Anyway, it was painful but far less significant than his enemies suppose. On the other hand, I don't buy the "lack of sleep" excuse put out by the campaign - I believe I read months ago that Cain boasts about only needing a few hours' sleep a night.
“Rush is so full of crap on this.”
No, I think you are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.