Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is the Wood Recently Found on Mt. Ararat from the Ark?
Answers in Genesis ^ | Nov. 9, 2011 | Andrew A. Snelling

Posted on 11/16/2011 7:49:05 AM PST by fishtank

From the conclusion:

"Conclusion

If the wooden remains of the Ark were to be found on Mt. Ararat, then samples of that wood would be expected to yield C-14 dates of between 20,000 years and 50,000 years, consistent with the C-14 dates of pre-Flood wood found fossilized in the geologic record of the Flood. Even though the true age of such fossilized pre-Flood wood should be only 4,500 years or so old, around the date for the biblical Flood, these grossly inflated C-14 dates obtained in conventional radiocarbon dating laboratories are due to those laboratories ignoring the very much less C-14 in the pre-Flood world compared to today’s world. But in strong contrast, the wood samples that have been claimed by a Chinese-Turkish team to have supposedly come from their discovery of the wooden remains of the Ark on Ararat have yielded C-14 dates from analyses in conventional radiocarbon laboratories ranging from recent (modern) to 6,891±4,647 years. These results are grossly short of what the C-14 dates should be for pre-Flood wood. Therefore, if we logically follow the soundest scientific inference, it must be concluded that these wood samples cannot have come from the pre-Flood wood used to build the Ark. Given the present C-14 evidence, despite the tantalizing wooden remains the Chinese-Turkish team claims to have discovered on Mt. Ararat, such artifacts CANNOT have come from the Ark. So whatever they have found, they are NOT the remains of the Ark."

(Excerpt) Read more at answersingenesis.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 300manyearsoflabor; ararat; archaeology; ark; belongsinreligion; catastrophism; creation; flood; godsgravesglyphs; hoax; mountararat; noah; noahsarc; noahsark; nonsense; notanewstopic; ntsa; nuttery; religion; turkey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: Jonty30

nice on-the-money toss


41 posted on 11/16/2011 9:10:40 AM PST by tweakDU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: alancarp
it should make one wonder how that wood got up there

Yeah -- I mean it's not like ancient people ever made stuff out of wood and carried some of it around with them....

42 posted on 11/16/2011 9:11:36 AM PST by Retro Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels
Remember Jesus did say not one jot or tittle would be removed from the Holy Words...

Yes, but nowhere does it say in Genesis say XXX amount of years passed. It's all guess work of a nobody preacher. It does not invalidate the events of the Bible one bit to surmise that more years passed than what mr. nobody preacher says. We also get little things like Cain going to live with others after his ostracisation. Where did those people come from? Time had to go by to populate that region, right? Especially when Cain and Abel are first sons.
43 posted on 11/16/2011 9:16:00 AM PST by Thorliveshere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: JayVee

Lot of people don’t believe david ever existed because it isn’t written everywhere in archeological finds.


44 posted on 11/16/2011 9:16:18 AM PST by mel (There are only 2 races decent and undecent people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: null and void

45 posted on 11/16/2011 9:18:54 AM PST by dfwgator (I stand with Herman Cain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Thorliveshere

It is NOT guesswork - simply adding the ages of the patriarchs and their first born males. Jesus Christ lineage is documented twice both from Joseph and from Mary.

How do you like them apples?


46 posted on 11/16/2011 9:20:45 AM PST by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Retro Llama; MHGinTN

Obviously we’d be talking about a bunch of it here... way more than anybody would reasonably carry, and this is hardly a militarily strategic spot, so there’s no reason to go that high up for any sustainable purpose.

Suffice it to say: if somebody finds — and reasonably documents — an ‘ark-like’ quantity of wood not native to the area up there, then it becomes a news story.


47 posted on 11/16/2011 9:21:35 AM PST by alancarp (Liberals are all for shared pain... until they're included in the pain group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Thorliveshere

In Adam’s case I believe it was from Seth not Cain nor Able.


48 posted on 11/16/2011 9:23:53 AM PST by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels

http://www.biblestudy.org/maps/large-chart-life-span-patriarchs-from-adam-to-noah.html


49 posted on 11/16/2011 9:26:34 AM PST by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
these grossly inflated C-14 dates obtained in conventional radiocarbon dating laboratories are due to those laboratories ignoring the very much less C-14 in the pre-Flood world compared to today’s world.

I'm mildly curious to know the basis for this claim. I don't recall seeing anything about 14C in the Bible.

50 posted on 11/16/2011 9:29:35 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thorliveshere

If on the other hand you need some scientific proofs for a young aged Earth and Universe...

101 Evidences for a Young Age of the Earth...And the Universe
http://creation.com/age-of-the-earth


51 posted on 11/16/2011 9:31:24 AM PST by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: alancarp
There is a mounting body of evidence that a huge water reservoir (or perhaps two or three) burst forth and flooded the entire region of the Middle east. There was a huge body of water in the Northern hemisphere which when it broke loose probably created the Great Lakes. Another (or the same one filling the Great Lakes) huge body of fresh water may have burst into the Atlantic ocean to cause the shutdown of the halene (sp?) cycle for six hundred years and causing a mini ice age over Europe.
52 posted on 11/16/2011 9:35:07 AM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

The idea of a *4 billion year-old universe* is a construct of men.


53 posted on 11/16/2011 9:35:54 AM PST by ne1410s (Tolerate my intolerance or you also are being intolerant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Thorliveshere
You might enjoy the following, from a Jewish Rabbi/astrophysicist:

http://www.geraldschroeder.com/AgeUniverse.aspx

54 posted on 11/16/2011 9:37:31 AM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau; JaguarXKE
Too afraid to click on it...

It's just some ZZ Top, nothing too offensive. I thought it might be this one. It's safe, too - why, it even opens with a bit of Gregorian Chant. :-)

55 posted on 11/16/2011 9:44:51 AM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

That’s pretty similar to what Dr. Walt Brown PhD has presented in his online book - except that it was global not local...

Center for Scientific Creation - In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/IntheBeginningTOC.html

I bought the 8th edition hardback version for around $30.


56 posted on 11/16/2011 9:49:36 AM PST by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

An easy lie to believe.


57 posted on 11/16/2011 9:49:58 AM PST by RoadGumby (For God so loved the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

I have never heard that theory about Adam to Seth. Is it a commonly held idea?


58 posted on 11/16/2011 9:50:50 AM PST by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: healy61

I’ve both read and talked to biblical teachers who raise it as a possibility.


59 posted on 11/16/2011 9:51:31 AM PST by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Can you show me where He affirmed otherwise?

What is in the Bible is Truth. It is composed of history and prophesy and teachings. It is all we need to know, yet I think it is also correct to say it is not all that is to know.

Work out your salvation with fear and trembling. Decide that pieces/parts of the Bible are not true at your own hazard.


60 posted on 11/16/2011 9:54:00 AM PST by RoadGumby (For God so loved the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson