Posted on 11/21/2011 11:58:28 AM PST by servo1969
Rush Limbaugh has now confirmed what I wrote last week, explaining to a caller on Friday, November 18th that the elephant in the room in the Penn State scandal was that the alleged pedophile acts committed by Jerry Sandusky were homosexual in nature.
So much for those who scorned the suggestion, and kudos to Rush for speaking his mind.
Here’s the relevant background. On November 15th, two of my articles were posted online, “The Pedophile Elephant in the Gay Activist Closet” and “What Could End Rush Limbaugh’s Career?”
In the first article I stated that, “I personally believe that the great majority of homosexual men also deplore Sandusky’s alleged acts. At the same time, there is a very large pedophile elephant that is hiding in the gay activist closet.” (I was referring to the celebration of pederasty in gay history, along with the fact that a number of 20th century gay icons supported NAMBLA, the notorious North American Man Boy Love Association.)
As for Rush, I drew attention to a statement he made to a caller on November 8th about Penn State, namely, that, “Nobody has the guts to actually give the explanation for what was going on and why there was trepidation in reporting it, and that’s all I’ll say.”
In response to this I asked, “Could it be that the sex abuse scandal involved a man abusing boys, meaning that the acts were homosexual in nature? . . . Of course, the fact that there are homosexual pedophiles does not mean that all (or most) gays are child abusers. Certainly not! And yet even Rush Limbaugh, it appears, would not address this directly.”
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
“All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, to make it possible.”
T. E. Lawrence, “The Seven Pillars of Wisdom”
They probably should have bought the expertsexchange name so that it would redirect to the correct site and only advertise the one with the hyphen. I contracted for a dot com in the early part of the century and one of my responsibilities was to reserve any relavant domain names that we could anywhere in the world. It wold be like google reserving gogle.com and goggle.com.
What boggles my little brain is the cruelty implicit in this. Such predators are wishing misery and twistedness upon their prey.
About 70% of all victims are female.
Yes, like little jeremiah said - which means that homosexual men are (.30/.02)/(.70/.98)=21 times as likely to molest.
And I’ll bet Drudge wished he had bought Drudge.com
I’ve never had a dusty dream in my life....
There is little difference if any between Homosexuals and Pedophiles.
Does the data or math suggest that homo rapists are more comfortable raping girls than women, all else equal?
I have taken apart many a cranial cavity as well, I didn’t notice any ‘dusty recesses’ either. ;)
That’s a wide belief among psychoanalysts, that homosexuality represents, in part, a sticking in immature thought. Seems plausible, because kids monkey around with all manner of stuff that adults would find unthinkable or bizarre.
Which was the case in most of the priest incidents. But the pro-homosexual press keep using the term pedophile, even when the victims was older than 15.
That’s what my professor told my in my psychology classes in the 1950s. Fact is it was the shrinks who insisted that homosexuality was a disease rather than a moral perversion. Then when it became evident that they couldn’t cure it by their methods, they declared it normal.
homosexual acts are just that. There is no moral acceptability card just because of age.
Just girls or females with young males?
According to the 2004 study there is a larger chance while in the public school as opposed to church or other environments.
Except the home.
Interesting, that’s a testable hypothesis in some ways.
All that is pretty much understood. What may be a real "elephant in the room" is race, or if you like class or ethnicity.
There’s nothing that conclusively proves it can’t be both/and. People can choose sick or “diseased” ways of thinking, with various amounts of ignorance involved about what is normal. To the extent that people in the process of doing so willfully reject God’s light about what is right, sin is implied. And the august scientists of NARTH have found that just about any plausible cognitive theory of homosexuality is equally useful to caring therapists helping willing patients break this habit, further clouding the picture. In a way I would have to venture that this is much like God, who “gives wisdom without finding fault.” God is not interested in blaming a person, at least not a saved person, for a past whose sin has been confessed. God is interested in showing that person what the right thing to do is.
OMG! I think that store is in Tacoma!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.