Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: LucyT
To: Jet Jaguar; Lady Jag
Isn't there something called posse comitatus or something like that says this is not okay?
3 posted on
12/10/2011 7:36:24 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: Jet Jaguar
I think we all knew this was coming. The question now is, how long be for they start using Hellfire missiles.
7 posted on
12/10/2011 7:43:02 PM PST by
MCF
To: Jet Jaguar
gee, that didn’t take long. the first news release of drones being used in civilian airspace went into rotation just this week.
To: Jet Jaguar
10 posted on
12/10/2011 7:47:52 PM PST by
CJ Wolf
(OMG - Obama Must Go!)
To: Jet Jaguar
Coming to a hobby shop near you: ``U.S. Govt to ban all R/C model aircraft which could used to attack drones.``
To: Jet Jaguar
sophisticated sensors under the nose helped pinpoint the three suspects and showed they were unarmed. Police rushed in
Keep weapons close.
"We don't use [drones] on every call out. If we have something in town like an apartment complex, we don't call them."
Stay anonymously in densely populated areas, not the open range :-)
12 posted on
12/10/2011 7:49:53 PM PST by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(REPEAL WASHINGTON! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
To: Jet Jaguar
Next step will be Hellfire missiles.
13 posted on
12/10/2011 7:57:43 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Holding our flawed politicians to higher standards than the enemyÂ’s politicians guarantees they win)
To: Jet Jaguar
Is this why there aren’t that many black helicopter sightings anymore?
18 posted on
12/10/2011 8:01:37 PM PST by
Pan_Yans Wife
("Real solidarity means coming together for the common good."-Sarah Palin)
To: Jet Jaguar
Local police say they have used two unarmed Predators based at Grand Forks Air Force Base to fly at least two dozen surveillance flights since June. Unarmed.
Sure.
For now...
.
21 posted on
12/10/2011 8:04:30 PM PST by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: Jet Jaguar
22 posted on
12/10/2011 8:05:34 PM PST by
2ndDivisionVet
(You can't invade the US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.~Admiral Yamamoto)
To: Jet Jaguar
"We don't use [drones] on every call out," said Bill Macki, head of the police SWAT team in Grand Forks. "If we have something in town like an apartment complex, we don't call them." Right now there's someone thinking: "Surveillance is very useful in solving crime. Those apartments are a blind spot, though. We need to figure a way to see in there ..."
And that's how the telescreens ended up in every room. I feel much safer now, don't you?
25 posted on
12/10/2011 8:08:02 PM PST by
ZOOKER
( Exploring the fine line between cynicism and outright depression)
To: Jet Jaguar
Predator drones for 6 cows?
“Brandishing rifles”? How does one carry a rifle without “brandishing”?
Why is Eric Holder running around free when a border patrol agent is dead from Fast and Furious? Are cows taking priority?
To: Jet Jaguar
Could have predicted this years ago...
But I’m just a kook, dontcha know.
27 posted on
12/10/2011 8:11:27 PM PST by
Cockroach
(If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever. 1984 G Orwell)
To: Jet Jaguar
As the former commander of a “pseudo military force”; The CAP, I’d very much put a Predator B into the air instead of an unarmed Cessna 172. This report states that the Customs and Border Protection Service was doing the flying; seems OK to me, given the armed nature of the threat. Bad guys are bad guys, folks, and yes, I see the potential for abuse, making electing the right people all the more important! Keep working to elect the right people!
29 posted on
12/10/2011 8:12:38 PM PST by
Ace's Dad
(Reagan Contra; in-country off the USS Boulder.)
To: Jet Jaguar
Let’s see.
- Armed men
- Stolen property
- Search warrant
No problem here, however the ease of which the government can implement surveillance is alarming on all fronts, as technology grows in leaps and bounds.
Does casual and passive surveillance from public areas violate anything other than what we feel in spirit?
If so, what about beat cops patrolling your neighborhood?
Or how about border surveillance over a mix of private and public property?
30 posted on
12/10/2011 8:19:38 PM PST by
Usagi_yo
To: Jet Jaguar
If this happened when Bush was President, the Press would be screaming and demanding heads. No matter who owns or controls them, it’s be on Bush’s head. Whew, good thing we have a President who takes so many vacations, or they’d think HE was responsible.
31 posted on
12/10/2011 8:23:40 PM PST by
theDentist
(fybo; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
To: Jet Jaguar
What happens if drone technology falls into the hands of drug criminals?
Federal laws restricting non-government use of drones coming soon.
No drones for civilians!
Do it for the children!
32 posted on
12/10/2011 8:27:21 PM PST by
MrBambaLaMamba
(This Message Contains Privileged Attorney-Client Communications)
To: Jet Jaguar
So, this is how it starts.
37 posted on
12/10/2011 8:49:21 PM PST by
Sarajevo
(Is it true that cannibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny?)
To: Jet Jaguar
41 posted on
12/10/2011 8:57:55 PM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson