Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Gingrich 2,000 Ballot Signatures Short?
BearingDrift ^ | December 24, 2011 | Shaun Kennedy

Posted on 12/23/2011 10:20:59 PM PST by Plutarch

UPDATE (12.53am): Sources at RPV are telling me that the 2,000 signatures do not have addresses on them… meaning that they cannot be verified. Newt Gingrich may very well be off the ticket in Virginia, folks…

Rumor has it this evening that one of the petition gatherers was not qualified to circulate petitions… which technically disqualifies those signatures in Virginia.

This would mean that the only two campaigns that qualified in the Virginia primary will be Ron Paul and Mitt Romney.

However… and there’s always a however… former State Senator Marty Williams back in 2007 was accused of having a handler circulate petitions to get him on the ballot that was not legally able to do so. The court ruled that, though the petitioner was not legally entitled to circulate the petitions, the enfranchisement of those who did sign the petitions trumped the lack of qualifications the petition gatherer held.

Ergo, even if this report is right, Gingrich will have the names needed to qualify for the Virginia ballot.

If… these reports are true…


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: deadbeatdad; gingrich; paul; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 last
To: Plutarch

Can Newt challenge this? But such a thing would cost time, money and energy that needs to be spent on the campaign itself. A write-in campaign might help, but if Newt loses Virginia, all the more ammunition from the establishment and dems. Newt is my candidate, but I have to say this is just inexcusable. Wasn’t there another state that they were saying a few weeks ago that Newt might not qualify to get on the ballot? Someplace like Wisconsin? I could swear I remember seeing something. The only thing that would make this whole thing funny is if it turned out that Mitt also failed to qualify. Now that would be hilarious if it was only Ron Paul.


101 posted on 12/24/2011 9:59:16 AM PST by Proudcongal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46
2,000 signatures with no addresses? I cannot believe that to be true. The form used for the signatures requires the entry of the person’s address. Why didn’t the signature gatherers make sure these forms were filled out properly? How did the signers get the idea that they did not have to fill in their address? This thing stinks to high heaven and the Virginia Republican Party will have hell to pay if signatures lacked address entries.

I agree. 2000 out of 10000 is 20%. I can see maybe 100 signatures being questionable, but 20%? Something stinks is right.

102 posted on 12/24/2011 10:08:38 AM PST by Proudcongal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

I am a conservative, Southern Baptist.
I have NO PROBLEM voting for a Mormon.
I have a huge problem voting for a RINO.
That said, I guess I will hold my nose and vote Romney if he is the candidate.

Hey, what else can we do? Like I would EVER vote for Obama.

NEVER.


103 posted on 12/24/2011 10:19:48 AM PST by a real Sheila (Taylor/Fife 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TBBT
sounds like willful sabotage from within.

Or EXTREME incompetence.

104 posted on 12/24/2011 10:21:37 AM PST by a real Sheila (Taylor/Fife 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

You missed the news that TX was moved back to April 3.

So Super Tuesday is now MA, VT, VA, OH, GA, TN, OK, ND, ID, AK.

Romney should win VT, MA, VA. Someone else should win GA, TN, OK. OH I’m not sure about. The 3 caucus states of ND, ID, and AK could be up in the air althouh Romney won all 3 in 2008. ID is heavily mormon so he should be ok there.

And this is after February where Romney is poised to do extremely well. NV, MN, CO, ME, MI, AZ are all favorable towards him. As well as the caucus in WA on March 3 right before Super Tuesday. So he could well build up a huge cushion against some setbacks on Mar 6.

Will anyone care if Newt wins GA? TN and OK are farily small delegate wise.

The calendar is looking pretty good for Romney right about now.


105 posted on 12/24/2011 10:25:28 AM PST by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Proudcongal
I agree. 2000 out of 10000 is 20%. I can see maybe 100 signatures being questionable, but 20%? Something stinks is right.

"Never assume conspiracy when ineptitude will do".

Making excuses for Newt you are. His signature gathering effort was a confused and dilatory, using paid shills at shopping malls and supermarkets. The successful efforts were conducted by volunteers outside polling places, which garners actual registered voters.

Newt's executive incompetence is on full display. If he can't muster the ability to get on his home State ballot he is hardly GOP nominee material.

106 posted on 12/24/2011 10:33:31 AM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: onyx
another typo...and no it was too much egg nogg..wish I could make that excuse!

You GET a security clearance “de facto” by being elected to Congress. etc

107 posted on 12/24/2011 11:08:08 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Who is doing the counting - mitt’s behind the scenes crew?

HE IS DESPERATE and so is Barry.


108 posted on 12/24/2011 12:51:12 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Good post! I agree and want him more than ever - screw the MSM, ‘rats and rinos. Fighting FOR America is not easy and I’m thankful he’s doing it for us.


109 posted on 12/24/2011 12:59:23 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Proudcongal

I believe that we are on the verge of a huge Romney sweep of the whole party.


110 posted on 12/24/2011 3:30:20 PM PST by Theodore R. (I'll still vote for Santorum if he is on the April 3 ballot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane
Why, all of a sudden, for this election I hear so many candidates having problem collecting signatures and getting on the ballot

If I were to guess, managerial skills of the current crop of candidates are deteriorating. Modern politics is largely done by personal contacts, phone calls, backroom deals. This particular test, however, is pure management and your own skills - like the old "trial by combat." You are being tested by the real world, and no phone call can help you.

I'm sure if I wanted I could have collected 11,000 signatures for myself. I'd have it planned, of course, and the deadline wouldn't be a complete surprise to me. Anyone who ever had to run a business a notch above a lemonade stand has to know how to plan things. That's a dying skill in this America.

111 posted on 12/24/2011 5:17:02 PM PST by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
If there’s one thing we need right now, it’s a Hitler Downfall YouTube video of Hitler finding out Newt didn’t get on the Virginia ballot.

Couldn't find one yet. Will this do?

112 posted on 12/24/2011 7:27:01 PM PST by Dick Holmes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson