LOL the video link is bad.
Ron Paul’s not crazy. Pon Paul’s not conservative. Ron Paul is not a true Republican. Ron Paul is an evil, bigoted, anti-semitic little troll. He’s a liar and a hypocrite as well.
Yes
In today's world you have to add something about energy to that picture. Also there should be some mention of a believable political system which was supported by the vast majority of the population.
OK,ok... not crazy... deranged...
Ron Paul’s not crazy. Pon Paul’s not conservative. Ron Paul is not a true Republican. Ron Paul is an evil, bigoted, anti-semitic little troll. He’s a liar and a hypocrite as well.
What does this mean? He’s still on video campaigning with and endorsing a well-known Code Pink activist and 9/11 truther, etc, etc, etc, etc.
bfl
He seemed to be who was behind the numbers that made Ron Paul's predictions so accurate.
No individual, no family, no business and certainly no nation can flaunt the natural laws of finance for long.
Sooner or later, each will crash and burn the same as an overloaded 747 that runs out of fuel with nary a runway in sight.
We are not exempt from the lesson history is about to teach us.
Well yes. Yes I do...........
Yes, I do.
So does most of the voting public, which is why Ron Paul supporters are crazy to think he'll win in a general election.
How anyone can support this racist, jew hating, retarded 10 year scum-filled newsletter publisher and all around COMPLETE stuttering nutjob is beyond me.
My of my. Didn’t you stir up the demonic mob! At this point there have been 68 comments on the article you posted, and all of them negative and most of them ad hominem.
Why is the mob so threatened by Ron Paul? Why such detailed research into his past? Why the consistent, repeated, assertions that he is “crazy” and “a liar”? The viciousness of the attacks makes me think that there is something else going on here—perhaps a threat to the establishment’s status quo? or to the vested interests?
I’m sick of this “Ron Paul is crazy” BS.
That’s Alinsky tactics. He may be wrong on some things, and he’s not my candidate. But he’s been a rare (lone) voice that has been right on issues of government and liberty for a long time.
Economic disaster is the greatest threat to our nation, not swarthy bomb throwers or border-crossing Mexicans.
I disagree on some issues, but most of what I hear of Paul’s positions comes from his hostile opponents, not from him.
I have studied and understand libertarianism, and agree with Ronald Reagan that it is at the core of conservatism.
Libertarianism is compatible with controlled borders and a sane foreign policy.
Sometimes, libertarians make provocative points to get attention, and to cause people to think. That might be a little bit of a strain for some.
If I don’t have any politically plausible anti-Romney to vote for this Saturday at my Nevada Caucus, I’m supporting Ron Paul, to send the statist Republicans a message.
If you take the message as: “I’m so angry at the big government Republicans that I’ll vote for a loony-bird who believes in small government, so be it.”
Lay off the bong hits and wake up Paulitards.
A busted clock is right twice a day. But, it’s still busted.
rhetorical question