Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Santorum Currently Up 80 Votes In Iowa Caucuses Ballot Count…
Weasel Zippers ^ | 1/16/2012 | Weasel Zippers

Posted on 01/17/2012 8:36:54 AM PST by Qbert

Oh my.

MYRTLE BEACH, S.C. — It’s conventional wisdom in Republican circles here in South Carolina that if Mitt Romney wins the state’s primary this Saturday — having already won in Iowa and New Hampshire — he’ll be the GOP presidential nominee.

“If for some reason he’s not derailed here and Mitt Romney wins South Carolina — no one’s ever won all three — I think it should be over,” Sen. Lindsey Graham said Sunday. “That would be quite a testament to his ability as a candidate and a campaigner.”

But what if Romney did not actually win Iowa? That could change the calculation considerably. And there is a very real chance that the Republican Party of Iowa will announce this week that Rick Santorum, and not Romney, won the Iowa caucuses.

Results released on caucus night — actually, at 2 the next morning — showed Romney won by eight votes, 30,015 to Santorum’s 30,007. Many observers assumed that those results were final, especially when party officials said there would be no recount.

But the results were not final. Even though there is no provision for a recount in the party caucuses, state GOP rules do require that the results be certified, which is nearly the same thing. That certification process began the day after the caucuses and is expected to wrap up this week, yielding a final, official vote tally.

The final numbers will be different from those released on caucus night. One campaign source says the vote count as of midday Monday showed Santorum ahead by 80-something votes. If that number holds through certification of the last precincts, Santorum will win. Of course, there is always the possibility that some of the final precincts will contain discrepancies that put Romney back on top. It’s just not clear.

keep reading...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: gingrich; iowacaucus; romney; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 01/17/2012 8:37:00 AM PST by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Qbert

The votes for Romney in Iowa were manipulated so that he’d have the “Romney wins Iowa” headline and give him momentum going into NH.

So transparent. But these tricks work and will likely result in Romney being the nominee.


2 posted on 01/17/2012 8:40:25 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic; American Constitutionalist; Antoninus; AuH2ORepublican; BlackElk; ...
Santorum for President Ping List.

FReepmail “Antoninus” to be added or removed.that up.

3 posted on 01/17/2012 8:41:02 AM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

It will be interesting to see if the media pays any real attention to this if Santorum wins Iowa or will they simply and quietly stop saying Romney won Iowa. You know the RINO establishment will make it low key.


4 posted on 01/17/2012 8:42:53 AM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

A Bush 2000 repeat?


5 posted on 01/17/2012 8:43:05 AM PST by grumpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Chipping away at the Willard statue the GOP has already commissioned.


6 posted on 01/17/2012 8:45:31 AM PST by Leep (Paul/Vantura 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Who the hell in the Santorum camp decided to play nice with Romney and not demand a recount of Iowa? Since the caucus the MSM has been pounding the line that Romney is the first GOP candidate to “win” both Iowa and NH since Ford.


7 posted on 01/17/2012 8:45:33 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

The unseemly rush to anounce results means stolen elctions.


8 posted on 01/17/2012 8:45:53 AM PST by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

Every outlet that can be reached the news should be relayed.


9 posted on 01/17/2012 8:46:33 AM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

The MEDIOTS will say Slick Willard “Sweeps” even when he loses in South Carolina....

http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/could-romney-sweep-all-50-states/315856

The Paultard will say he sweeps all three primaries even when he comes in dead last.


10 posted on 01/17/2012 8:46:45 AM PST by RasterMaster ("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight

The game playing is endless. I see the media has started to insert Buddy Roemer back into some of the polls to drain off the few votes from legitimate candidates.


11 posted on 01/17/2012 8:46:53 AM PST by cripplecreek (Stand with courage or shut up and do as you're told.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

"The votes for Romney in Iowa were manipulated so that he’d have the “Romney wins Iowa” headline and give him momentum going into NH.

So transparent. But these tricks work and will likely result in Romney being the nominee."

Yep. And now they're all talking about FL- when SC is the next vote.

But we're not going to just let him walk away with this without a real fight this time.

12 posted on 01/17/2012 8:48:25 AM PST by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grumpa

Right. A moderate nominee means a loss or a bare win with nobody excited to help the downticket races.

Although I think this time, the downticket races may pull the republican nominee over the top, but we’ll see.

In any event, it’s all out war and the republican establishment is playing patty-cake.


13 posted on 01/17/2012 8:48:47 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

I hope so and that will shut the media up in saying he won the first two states, broke records and all that other garbage.

Go Newt!


14 posted on 01/17/2012 8:49:23 AM PST by Qwackertoo (Gingrich/West 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierham

The unseemly rush to anounce results means stolen elctions.


Amen. And when Newt wins SC we can reshape the narrative to ‘Each candidate having won one state’.


15 posted on 01/17/2012 8:52:31 AM PST by txhurl (EVERYONE is losing their virginity in this election. -Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

I heard Santorum say last night the Iowa vote should be certified today or tomorrow and that it looked like a win!


16 posted on 01/17/2012 8:53:44 AM PST by RasterMaster ("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
“The votes for Romney in Iowa were manipulated so that he’d have the “Romney wins Iowa” headline and give him momentum going into NH.”

No, not really. The fact is, it was a close election. Most people would not take the initial results and hard and fast.

Wait for the final numbers.

Santorum and Romney essentially tied.

17 posted on 01/17/2012 8:56:06 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (I love how the FR spellchecker doesn't recognize the word "Obama")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster

I will be shocked if Santorum wins IA. It will mean that the IA state GOP came down with a case of honesty.

The nice thing about it will be all the dopes like Karl Rove blabbering about how significant Mittens winning IA and NH is totally meaningless.


18 posted on 01/17/2012 8:57:28 AM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight

"It will be interesting to see if the media pays any real attention to this if Santorum wins Iowa or will they simply and quietly stop saying Romney won Iowa. You know the RINO establishment will make it low key."

Exactly. (Either that, or they'll say that "although Santorum may have 'squeaked by' in Iowa, it's too late to stop Romney's momentum now".)

The counter to this argument: focus on what really matters- the delegate count.

19 posted on 01/17/2012 8:59:02 AM PST by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

There is no need not play nice on Santorum part. The process is going forward and nothing Santorum could say would change that.


20 posted on 01/17/2012 9:01:03 AM PST by Leep (Paul/Vantura 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson