Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen Poll Ohio (Santorum 42%, Romney 24%)
Rasmussen ^ | 2/16/12 | staff

Posted on 02/16/2012 9:36:15 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: Gator113
The Santorum supporters here are too busy crowing and celebrating victories that have not actually happened, to hear much of anything else.

But if they think the MSM hates Newt, just wait till they hear what the Left has in store for the “Reverend Rick” in the coming days. Just google “Santorum” and you will find out that there is a whole new definition of “NASTY” coming out against him.

41 posted on 02/16/2012 11:01:56 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: skaterboy

Amen to that.

Unfortunately, all four will be biting and chewing each other until the Convention.


42 posted on 02/16/2012 11:14:03 AM PST by ScottinVA (GOP, meet Courage... Courage, meet GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

It amazes me how you can see in front of you the guy that can take Romney out. What does Newt have 13%? He is not going to take Romney out.

Santorum can. Santorum ain’t the cool guy, but neither is Newt.

I am embarrassed at conservatives around here for rejecting a gift and thinking that they know better than the people who are voting now. People are choosing Santorum for a reason. It must be a good one or they would reject him.

I can’t imagine how great it would be if we got behind a winner, bolstered him up to go against the degenerate, America hating Obama.

I used to think we could beat Obama if we nominated an arrogant jackass. I think people are looking for a decent and honest person they can trust, not another arrogant jackass.


43 posted on 02/16/2012 11:14:03 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

“So, if a debate moderator or reporter asks Santorum: “do you favor gay marriage and abortion?”; should he say “yes”, or “no comment”, or what?”

In a debate or interview they should answer the question and move on. They should not, however, make it the central theme of their campaigns, ads or stump speeches. They just need to attack Obama on things that most Americans can agree on. Spending, the debt, etc.


44 posted on 02/16/2012 11:15:38 AM PST by FerociousRabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ruschpa

None of them generate much excitement overall, but Santorum does energize the conservative base more than the others.

It appears Gingrich has run his course and is losing relevancy, except to draw support from Santorum. Plus, Newt is double-digits behind Obama in every swing state. His negatives are way too high to be competitive.


45 posted on 02/16/2012 11:22:52 AM PST by ScottinVA (GOP, meet Courage... Courage, meet GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Nothing new here. The “media” would be doing the same to any conservative nominee.


46 posted on 02/16/2012 11:26:56 AM PST by ScottinVA (GOP, meet Courage... Courage, meet GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
Now if we could just get the idiot to drop out.....</sarcasm>
47 posted on 02/16/2012 11:27:29 AM PST by itsahoot (I will Vote for Palin, even if I have to write her in.(Recycled Tagline))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
I am surprised at the opposition to him on this forum.

It is not him they oppose but the God that he declares.

48 posted on 02/16/2012 11:34:27 AM PST by itsahoot (I will Vote for Palin, even if I have to write her in.(Recycled Tagline))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: FerociousRabbit
Stay far, far away from any and all social issues. It is the only thing that ever energizes the Democrat base and turns many independents away.

Nonsense. There's a reason Democrats try to keep gay marriage referendums off of the ballot, especially during an important election. Those issues energize the conservative base. Obama is trying to make birth control the issue, because abortion is an increasingly loser issue for the libs. I don't think we want to be talking about birth control per se, but abortion and gay marriage are winning issues for us. This episode with the church needs to be played out as Obamacare giving the government control over our lives. If they came for the church on this, who will they come after next? And what's to stop a conservative president from stepping in and deciding to ban birth control if they have this much power over health care? The argument can be made to both sides of the aisle.

49 posted on 02/16/2012 11:39:05 AM PST by JediJones (Newt-er the Establishmentarian Duo MittRick in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

50 posted on 02/16/2012 11:40:10 AM PST by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
But if they think the MSM hates Newt, just wait till they hear what the Left has in store for the “Reverend Rick

This sounds a lot like.. Sure not enough people are working, but if we hadn't passed TARP, it would have been a whole worse. The situation was much worse than anyone knew....yada, yada, yada.

By the way have you noticed, Newt is running 4th in a four man race.

51 posted on 02/16/2012 11:46:18 AM PST by itsahoot (I will Vote for Palin, even if I have to write her in.(Recycled Tagline))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
None of them generate much excitement overall, but Santorum does energize the conservative base more than the others.

Incorrect. Newt increased turnout in SC by about 35% when he won. The other states have been flat or with decreased turnout. Newt's been the only one to offer anything fresh and exciting into the race.

It appears Gingrich has run his course and is losing relevancy, except to draw support from Santorum.

It appeared after Iowa that Santorum had run his course and was losing relevancy, except to draw support from Gingrich.

Plus, Newt is double-digits behind Obama in every swing state. His negatives are way too high to be competitive.

Polls right now are utterly meaningless. They've been meaningless even mere days before some of these primaries, so why you would reference them in relation to an election NINE MONTHS AWAY is hard to imagine. Obama's ahead of all of our candidates right now. Maybe we should just give up or just let Ron Paul and his crew have this one just to get it out of his system.

52 posted on 02/16/2012 11:48:25 AM PST by JediJones (Newt-er the Establishmentarian Duo MittRick in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
And the beat goes on...............

Ohio Republican Presidential Primary

Polling Data

Poll Date Sample Santorum Romney Gingrich Paul Spread
RCP Average 1/28 - 2/15 -- 33.3 26.0 19.7 10.0 Santorum +7.3
Rasmussen Reports 2/15 - 2/15 750 LV 42 24 13 10 Santorum +18
Quinnipiac 2/7 - 2/12 553 LV 36 29 20 9 Santorum +7
PPP (D) 1/28 - 1/29 626 RV 22 25 26 11 Gingrich +1

Michigan Republican Presidential Primary

Polling Data

Poll Date Sample MoE Santorum Romney Paul Gingrich Spread
RCP Average 2/10 - 2/14 -- -- 37.0 28.8 10.6 10.0 Santorum +8.2
Mitchell/Rosetta Stone 2/14 - 2/14 455 LV 4.6 34 25 11 5 Santorum +9
Inside MI Politics/MRG 2/13 - 2/14 800 LV 3.5 43 33 8 11 Santorum +10
Rasmussen Reports 2/13 - 2/13 750 LV 4.0 35 32 13 11 Santorum +3
Detroit News 2/11 - 2/13 500 RV 4.4 34 30 9 12 Santorum +4
PPP (D) 2/10 - 2/12 404 RV 4.9 39 24 12 11 Santorum +15

53 posted on 02/16/2012 11:51:52 AM PST by deport (..............God Bless Texas............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

Got my Rick Santorum yard signs in yesterday. Put one up today. Looks nice. So does this article.

Go Rick!


54 posted on 02/16/2012 11:53:38 AM PST by Engraved-on-His-hands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

I second your WOOT!


55 posted on 02/16/2012 12:04:07 PM PST by Antoninus (Mitt Romney -- attempting to execute a hostile take-over of the Republican Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

I respectfully disagree.

Will Democrats come to vote for Obama:
Because of the economy?
Because of gas prices?
Because of unemployment?
Because of the deficits?

No. Not really.

Will Democrats come out to vote because of gays, abortion, contraception and trampling on religious freedom?

In droves.

Republicans will come out in force to vote against Obama no matter what. Democrats are not nearly as enthusiastic about Obama this time around UNLESS there is something that can motivate them to come out. That something is social issues.

Social issues motivate conservatives as well but we are already motivated to vote. Don’t give Democrats a reason to want to vote for Obama as well. Let them stay home on election day.


56 posted on 02/16/2012 12:17:21 PM PST by FerociousRabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: dforest

“........ and thinking that they know better than the people who are voting now.”

I see, so because some folks that get to vote before me, I should fall in line and trust their choice and not make my own decision.

If you truly believe that is how it all works, you’re dumber than a box of rocks. Morons following other morons is exactly how Obama got in.

“It must be a good one or they would reject him.” Well, I have rejected him and for good reasons.... I just try not to bash him too much, unless pushed to do so in defense of MY candidate.

Santorum certainly has qualities, but not the kind that interest me... not for the presidency.

You should go ahead and follow the sheep.... I will not.


57 posted on 02/16/2012 12:17:58 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~..... GO NEWT GO--itÂ’s about the survival of our country!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Kenny
Do you think negative ads are backfiring?

Just hitting diminishing marginal returns. He took out Cain without spending much money, just a whisper campaign. The first time he hit Newt Iowa it did real damage. The second time he hammered Newt in Florida had to go 99% negative with a multi million dollar barrage to get the same impact. You just can't up the game much more than 99%.

If it was actually backfiring you would see Romney's numbers go down, but he is still at 24%, same as he would be if he did absolutely nothing. So it isn't that it is hurting Romney, it just isn't hurting Santorum as much now that people are used to seeing it.
58 posted on 02/16/2012 12:23:08 PM PST by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

In the end, the crying will be deafening, the pain will be lasting and the regret will be shared by all.


59 posted on 02/16/2012 12:27:28 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~..... GO NEWT GO--itÂ’s about the survival of our country!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

Looks like right now you are bound to defeat. Newt is over. Ya want Romney? Or Obama?


60 posted on 02/16/2012 12:33:05 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson