Posted on 02/16/2012 1:30:30 PM PST by ReformationFan
“They knew how to argue, they were master debaters.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Yes, some were indeed master debaters but greater yet than they and far more in demand were those who were known as cunning linguists.
“There are still a few who have a grasp of what is really important.”
Hey, I’m just an old guy, but I’m hanging on to tradition. :)
I read the article. My comment still stands.
If a husband cheats on his devoted wife who loves him, by consenting to have sex with another woman, she is caused tremendous grief by his infidelity. Even if the infidelity were reconciled, the sexual grievance would still deny her human satisfaction had his criminal action never occurred.
It very much is the business of the proper spouse, as well as the consequential familial relations, and ultimately the social fabric upon which the State is unified.
It also scars the thinking of the two criminals, such that their natural response in the future is more likely to promote further perverse behavior to satiate criminal desires.
That’s essentially how the left views the wealth which you create. It isn’t a giant leap to exactly what you are suggesting.
That’s essentially how the left views the wealth which you create. It isn’t a giant leap to exactly what you are suggesting.
Then please show me in the article where the author specifically endorsed the criminalization of all sexual activity, even between husband and wife, because I obviously missed that part.
“It only happens that way because the citizenry of America *WANT IT* to happen that way. We are the ultimate arbiters of what becomes law, as we are the ones who put lawmakers into office.
“And if we no longer wish to pay for the mistakes of others, then we will elect those who will change the laws of our land to reflect that.”
You’re more optimistic than I am. Our politicians(even the so-called “conservative” and “libertarian” ones) lack the courage to do what they promise while the libs and statists have the complete confidence in their ability to encourage behavior that results in more folks depending on the ever expanding government and voting them into office in order to get their “free” stuff.
Sarcasm
“I haz rights to sex!”
Wow - a line only a Democrap would come up with.
“I haz rights to sex!”
Wow - a line only a Democrap would come up with.
Bob Dole would beg to differ. I bet Libby Dole agrees with you though! ;D
So, it is "conservative" to support legalizing prostitution and sex between a father and his 18-year old daughter?
So, when the city of San Francisco was wrong to shutdown gay bathhouses at the height of the AIDS epidemic? You want to legalize prostitution? You want to allow fathers to sex with their 18-year old daughters?
“So, it is “conservative” to support legalizing prostitution and sex between a father and his 18-year old daughter?”
Firstly, are you discussing prostitution and the issue of the “family that plays together” or are you discussing fathers that both have sex with their daughters and pimp her for money, drugs, ad nauseam?
In any case, such an age minimum sounds like quite an improvement on the post “Embrace Diversity” movement here in Miami. We regularly are drenched with the details of another Turd World immigrant father having sex with his daughter. Usually, the daughter is far younger, but “All cultures are equal”.
In many a Turd World family, having a ban on under 18 daughters would be quite an improvement on the present situation.
Just sayin’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.