Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Open Letter to Rick Santorum (Vanity)
February 18, 2012 | no dems

Posted on 02/18/2012 7:27:44 AM PST by no dems

An Open Letter to Rick Santorum:

Dear Senator:

As a strong, common-sense Conservative, I have a favor to ask of you. Could you please consider not answering, off the cuff, every question thrown at you? Would you please engage your brain before putting your mouth in gear? I’m beginning to see now, how, as an incumbent, you lost your Senate seat by 18 pecentage points to the brain-dead Bob Casey. Women vote Senator; and, they vote in large numbers. Now, please consider this common-sense observation from a Conservative male:

Women have been in combat for years now. Women have used birth control for decades now. Some of your comments are so unbelievably naive. When you said that contraception was “bad for America”, I thought: “Hey Rick, if we didn’t have contraception, we’d have millions more bastard kids to support through the Welfare system than we have now.” People are going to have sex, Rick. Just because you believe it is primarily for procreation, some of us like a little intimacy with our spouse once in awhile without having 19 kids, like the Duggar family that has endorsed you.

Sorry, Rick, but, sometimes, you embarrass some of us who want to support you. And the comment, re: birth control, made by your biggest donor, Foster Friess, was over the top. He reminds me of Clayton Williams, the GOP candidate for Governor, who had the election in the bag against Ma Richards, until he made his stupid comment about women and rape.

Please Rick, you and Foster need to slow down, think, and then speak. Maybe a little more elucidation, before publication?

I wish you well.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bobcasey; claytonwilliams; duggars; embarrassment; family; fosterfriess; friess; ibtz; idiot; liberaltrollposter; lookmeimimportant; lunatic; marichards; pennsylvania; procreation; ricksantorum; santorum; whaaaaaaaa; whineyloserpost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last
To: no dems

Conservatives are so stupid.

It’s so easy to get them to turn on each other.

Libs always circle the wagons - especially on issues they consider important.

But you conservatives will argue over things that don’t even matter.

Why don’t you morons go pay your taxes? There’s going to be a lot more of them after the libs win the election this Nov. :)


41 posted on 02/18/2012 8:21:59 AM PST by Tzimisce (Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GenXteacher
“We’re a long way from the 1950’s.

Indeed. It’s a pity that civilization has fallen that far.

So you really miss segregation and the little woman at home barefoot and pregnant?

Be careful what you long for, friend.

42 posted on 02/18/2012 8:25:49 AM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

“[T]he folks who are most bothered by the infidelity of others are those who are stuck in miserable marriages and who feel self righteously that everyone should stick it out in a miserable marriage as well.”

Are you saying Rick Santorum is NOT one of “these folks”? Even if you’re not making this connection, “the folks who” is sufficient for proving both cases of ad hominem.

“The connection between the abusive and the circumstantial varieties of argumentum ad hominem is not difficult to see. The circumstatial variety may even be regarded as a special case of the abusive. The first use of the circumstantial charges people who dispute your conclusion with inconsistency, either among their beliefs or between their preaching and their practice, which may be regarded as a kind of reproach or abuse. The second use of the circumstantial charges one’s adversaries with being so prejudiced that their alleged reasons are mere rationalizations of conclusions dictated by self-interest. And that is certainly to abuse them . . . sometimes called “poisoning the well.”

Irving M. Copi, Introduction to Logic, 1986.


43 posted on 02/18/2012 8:26:24 AM PST by Mach9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

He’s not the one who is still ahead of RS in raw vote.


44 posted on 02/18/2012 8:27:48 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: no dems
And the comment, re: birth control, made by your biggest donor, Foster Friess, was over the top.

I cannot believe how so many fall for that silliness -- not the aspirin comment -- the reaction to mild humor from years ago. It was a polite way of advising a woman that if she is worried about getting pregnant then do not have sex. Catholic women had to use St. Joseph aspirin.

Nowadays of course we have to be "cool" like Bill Clinton telling women his method for them to avoid getting pregnant -- I guess I just an old fuddy-duddy.

What's next?

Headline: "Take my wife... please!" Not funny, Mr. President!
Outrageous Insult to All Women!
The House impeaches President. "Off him!" demand NOW.

45 posted on 02/18/2012 8:29:17 AM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork

“Men tend to take abortion lightly; they regard it as one of the numerous hazards imposed on women by malignant nature, but fail to realise fully the values involved. The woman who has recourse to abortion is disowning feminine values, her values, and at the same time is in most radical fashion running counter to the ethics established by men. Her whole moral universe is being disrupted....[H]ow could they fail to feel an inner mistrust of the presumptuous principles that men publicly proclaim and secretly disregard? They learn to believe no longer in what men say when they exalt woman or when they exalt man; the one thing they are sure of is this rifled and bleeding womb, these shreds of crimson life, this child that is not there.” - Simone de Beauvoir, feminist leader and advocate of legalized abortion, in The Second Sex, 1952


46 posted on 02/18/2012 8:30:01 AM PST by Notwithstanding (1998 ACU ratings: Newt=100%, Paul=88%, Santorum=84% [the last year all were in Congress])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mach9

You totally missed the use of illustrative analogy and you also read abuse into a potential observation that surely does not rise to the level of abuse.

You also disregarded my “evidence” - which while was somewhat anecdotal, does speak to a truth that can be and has been backed up by more scientific research.

And then there’s the notion that the definition you used for Ad Hominem is the accepted definition in today’s parlance. I do not.

Oh for 4.


47 posted on 02/18/2012 8:32:04 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork
I’ve always found that the biggest benefactors of birth control and legal abortion have been predatory males.

The irony is that this has happened in spite of, or maybe because of, the feminist movement.

Ding. Ding. Ding. Hammer ... meet nail. And this was all FORETOLD IN 1968!

Four Prophecies

In Humanae Vitae, Pope Paul VI made four rather general "prophecies" about what would happen if the Church's teaching on contraception were ignored ...

1) Infidelity and moral decline ...

2) Lost Respect for Women ...

3) Abuse of Power ...

4) Unlimited Dominion ...

"Whoever has ears ought to hear ... they hear but do not listen or understand."

48 posted on 02/18/2012 8:32:04 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork

“The freedom that women were supposed to have found in the Sixties largely boiled down to easy contraception and abortion; things to make life easier for men, in fact.”

Julie Burchill, British feminist and abortion advocate, in Damaged Goods, 1986


49 posted on 02/18/2012 8:33:25 AM PST by Notwithstanding (1998 ACU ratings: Newt=100%, Paul=88%, Santorum=84% [the last year all were in Congress])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: no dems
And the comment, re: birth control, made by your biggest donor, Foster Friess, was over the top.

Good Lord! It was an old cornball joke, so clean Bob Hope could have told it a ladies' tea party.

We have become a nation of English countesses, fainting from the vapors at any hint of frivolity.

50 posted on 02/18/2012 8:34:28 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

I would vote Third Party before voting for Romney. Right now, I wonder if any of our candidates could defeat the Marxist Muslim in the White House. What an inferior lot we have to choose from.


51 posted on 02/18/2012 8:34:47 AM PST by no dems (I can't back Santorum anymore. He's so frickin' out of touch with the real world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GulfBreeze; no dems

I do not know no dems and I do not totally agree with this post (though I agree in part).

Having said that, your response was a pitiful attempt at snarky humor and added absolutely nothing of intellectual heft to the debate. So, no humor and no brains — what was it you were hoping to accomplish?


52 posted on 02/18/2012 8:35:18 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia

“So you really miss segregation and the little woman at home barefoot and pregnant? “

I wasn’t around actually. I had to grow up a product of a broken family in an America paralyzed by its defeat in Vietnam, awash in drugs, populated now by tattooed savages with pins through their noses. When I listen to my elders tell me of a time when people didn’t have to lock doors and could leave car keys in a car; when I read about a time when a Congress would actually put “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance instead of passing abominations like Obamacare without reading them; then I cannot help but think that despite its warts, it was a lot closer to civilization’s height than we are now.


53 posted on 02/18/2012 8:36:30 AM PST by GenXteacher (He that hath no stomach for this fight, let him depart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: All
I remember when.. but being polite now is a crime.

Nowadays of course we have to be "cool" like Bill Clinton telling women his method for them to avoid getting pregnant -- I guess I am just an old fuddy-duddy.

What's next?

Headline:

"Take my wife... please!" Not funny, Mr. President!
Outrageous Insult to All Women!
The House impeaches President Santorum. "Off him!" demand NOW.

54 posted on 02/18/2012 8:37:29 AM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: no dems
The predatory liberal media sits patiently on their perch, awaiting any single utterance that can be spun to their advantage.

I'm over 60 and I hear the "aspirin between the knees" joke in high school. The message behind it was simply "abstinence works". Of course, the sex-craved entitlement culture doesn't agree.

Every election season eventually becomes the silly-season when the MSM is allowed to call the shots. For instance, the debates with outlets like CNN and MSNBC are not debates, they are a shooting gallery. The "hosts'" job is to take pot shots at the GOP candidates, hoping to generate enough "negative" outtakes to fuel the democrat election's talking points and attack ads.

It's no wonder that debates are being cancelled by some of the candidates...they're not eager to sit under the hot light and endure the rubber hose questioning of the left....which is rarely about the issues or the economy, but focus on social issues.

The boo's we all heard at several debates when these questions are asked should tell the media heads that we see through their "got'cha" questions and that the people are not going to base their voting decisions purely on those issues.

The contraception issue is a boondoggle...a GOP trap, and a sidestep away from the "A" word (abortion), which the lefty pollsters have found is not a good subject to campaign on. It's a sure shot for something for the left to bitch about and to use in attack ads. The left has an uncanny knack of taking something like abortion and turn it into something that sounds like peoples' rights are being violated, like "banning contraception". How silly...and how stupid are the conservatives who fall for it.

But it appears like we're all going to sit on our collective butts and allow abortion, gay marriage, gays in the military, and racisim to cost us our country. I had hope when the 100's of thousands of Tea Partiers were gathering in Washington and elsewhere back in 2008-09 that we might be fighting back, but it appears the left has used Alinsky #5 to neuter that bunch too.

Mom's warning of "sticks and stones" no longer applies, call some of America's wussified people a name today and they either get on TV and whine about it, or they'er seeking therapy.
55 posted on 02/18/2012 8:40:29 AM PST by FrankR (You are only enslaved to the extent of the entitlements you receive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; NYer; netmilsmom; Tax-chick; don-o; AnAmericanMother

Catholic perspective thread ping.


56 posted on 02/18/2012 8:41:22 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GenXteacher
You've encountered part of the FreeRepublic contingent which greets any sort of nostalgia with "Oh? So want segregation and Jim Crow to come back, do you???"

Personally, I say: Everyone -- everyone -- had it better in the 1950s.

57 posted on 02/18/2012 8:42:20 AM PST by ClearCase_guy ("And the public gets what the public wants" -- The Jam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael

Go to about.com and the contraception guide (who is a planned parenthood gal) use the same aspirin-between-the-knees maxim as a joke, too.


58 posted on 02/18/2012 8:42:39 AM PST by Notwithstanding (1998 ACU ratings: Newt=100%, Paul=88%, Santorum=84% [the last year all were in Congress])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

In my case its not nostalgia- just a conclusion based on the information I can gather.


59 posted on 02/18/2012 8:47:07 AM PST by GenXteacher (He that hath no stomach for this fight, let him depart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

God forbid a politician stand on his faith....

Obummer stands on his hybrid “faith” of “Black Liberation Theology” - aka - Blame Whitey plus a massive does of Islam...

Maybe a few more politicians should stand on their faith instead of being among the biggest hypocrites in the world (like the supposedly Catholic Pelozi and company who stand fast for Abortion and so many other things that the Catholic faith they supposedly embrace are adamantly against).


60 posted on 02/18/2012 8:49:01 AM PST by TheBattman (Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson