Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq militia stone youths to death for "emo" style (Obama hands over Iraq to Iran)
reuters ^ | 3/10/2012 | Ahmed Rasheed and Mohammed Ameer

Posted on 03/11/2012 12:12:06 PM PDT by tobyhill

At least 14 youths have been stoned to death in Baghdad in the past three weeks in what appears to be a campaign by Shi'ite militants against youths wearing Western-style "emo" clothes and haircuts, security and hospital sources say.

Militants in Shi'ite neighborhoods where the stonings have taken place circulated lists on Saturday naming more youths targeted to be killed if they do not change the way they dress.

The killings have taken place since Iraq's interior ministry drew attention to the "emo" subculture last month, labeling it "Satanism" and ordering a community police force to stamp it out.

"Emo" is a form of punk music developed in the United States. Fans are known for their distinctive dress, often including tight jeans, T-shirts with logos and distinctive long or spiky haircuts.

At least 14 bodies of youths have been brought to three hospitals in eastern Baghdad bearing signs of having been beaten to death with rocks or bricks, security and hospital sources told Reuters under condition they not be identified because they were not authorized to speak to the media.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: emo; iran; iraq; shiites
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: autumnraine

They’re HIS PEOPLE.


21 posted on 03/11/2012 1:00:13 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (I'll "vote for an orange juice can", over Barry Obummer and another 4yrs, anyday!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
not that it matters much....but I’m sorry.

Ah, but it does matter. Sure this is an "anonymous" forum. But I have a suspicion that what you say here is what you say to people in your real world daily life. And I would bet there are plenty of out there and people who read this forum who will say to themselves "Thank you Norm". Not that I am speaking for them. Just speaking for me.

22 posted on 03/11/2012 1:03:26 PM PDT by bigheadfred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bigheadfred

My daughter served in Iraq. Willingly. Gate duty while in-country. Made it back whole. I wish they all had. I supported the war thinking it was going to be that. A war, and one that would be for a reason. Instead, it has become Vietnam 2 or worse.

I genuinely do regret that support more every day. Because our Cowards in office have no courage of conviction, no sense of right and wrong and no regard for the lives they wasted there. And I mistakenly supported that.

I AM sorry.


23 posted on 03/11/2012 1:18:41 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Islam is a gutter religion and we should just nuke the major mooselimb countries and turn them into glass {start with afgans, iran, pakistan and if they object too much, do the saudis.

Give Jordan, Syria and Lebanon to the Jews as well as control of the Suez canal.

Don't nuke egypt, but use moabs and drones one them.

Ax iraq and turkey if they want glass instead of sand, and tell both china and russia to piss off.

Also, inform china that we are cancelling our debt, and if they object, start checking their coast line for our boomers {oh, they can't find them. too bad}.

I know I'm taking a very peace loving and maybe even pussy stance, but it is Sunday and I did Mass, so I'm feeling very mellow today.

24 posted on 03/11/2012 1:22:06 PM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorists savages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
Japan and Germany were not allowed to just keep on keepin’ on. They did what we ‘let’ them do. If we did the same with one whole generation growing up under a fully even partially ‘westernized’ Iraq, those kids would have grown into adults wanting no part of Pighammed and Co. and would then have had a fighting chance to make something of it.

The reason they knuckled under was because we killed millions of their fighting men and millions of their civilians. Weirdly enough, our victory over the Taliban was too quick - too antiseptic. Most of the Pashtuns' fighting age males are still alive. The lesson of the Afghan campaign is that you haven't defeated the enemy until you have cowed them into submission - by killing a significant percentage of their fighters. For a country the size of Afghanistan that number is at least 500K. We've done less than 100K. What Bush needed to hammer home, in the initial euphoria of the Taliban's initial defeats, was that guerrilla war is the type of war where casualties are relatively light, but they go on for a long time, because this type of war helps preserve the enemy's fighting strength. The reason the Germans and the Japanese did not have the option of a guerrilla war was because their manpower was exhausted, and their civilians had been pushed to the brink in terms of family members and friends killed in combat and were on the brink of starvation. Japan and Germany lost 5% and 10% of their populations in WW2. The equivalent Afghan casualty count would be 1.5m or 3m dead.

25 posted on 03/11/2012 1:22:20 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX
deposing Saddam was a huge mistake

You better believe it was.

The two biggest counterweights to radical Islam were the Shah of Iran and Saddam Hussein.

Carter got rid of the Shah, Bush II got rid of Saddam. Idiotic.

26 posted on 03/11/2012 1:25:55 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

A little believin’ and you go all soft on us.....damn.... ;)


27 posted on 03/11/2012 1:26:01 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

I guess it goes back to the pussification of the American male. Those elected, even many who served prior, forgot what war really is and how to fight it. Instead, they bought into PC ‘clean’ warfare. How the hell do you fight a war when enemy casualties are a greater concern than your own? As in being worried about killing too many people?

Pussified idiots. Add every one of our war dead to the 9/11 count of the people PC has killed.


28 posted on 03/11/2012 1:30:54 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
Stop it.

I can accept this I genuinely do regret

I reserve I AM sorry for those truly sorry sons of beeotches in the White Hut, and other places...

And thank your daughter for her service, from me.

I think most people would agree that there is an inherent feeling in people to place a trust in their leaders to protect and defend their best interests. It isn't those people who fail(ed) when those leaders prove otherwise.

29 posted on 03/11/2012 1:53:20 PM PDT by bigheadfred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

And just so you know, Sgt. Evan Vela is my nephew. If you have any interest you can search FR with the keyword “vela”.


30 posted on 03/11/2012 1:56:00 PM PDT by bigheadfred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bigheadfred

I will, and I’ll relay your message.

Thank you.


31 posted on 03/11/2012 2:08:37 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Trying to civilize Muslims is like trying to teach a cat not to kill birds. What can you do about a society that kills its own youth?


32 posted on 03/11/2012 2:55:19 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
Trying to civilize Muslims is like trying to teach a cat not to kill birds.
I think it's more like trying to teach flies not to eat sh*t.
33 posted on 03/11/2012 2:57:01 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I for one would be interested in what the Koran says about men wearing their pants down around their thighs.


34 posted on 03/11/2012 5:01:36 PM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Agreed


35 posted on 03/11/2012 6:19:26 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

I was feeling so mellow I thought I was a liberal, had a couple of Johnny Walkers and a nap and now I’m back to my old mean self. Just go with my tag line, no mercy.


36 posted on 03/11/2012 9:00:39 PM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorists savages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

Thank god...must be a hell of a preacher you got there. Keep him away from any Repub candidates until the 2nd week of Nov. ;)


37 posted on 03/11/2012 9:38:37 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks tobyhill.
Militants in Shi'ite neighborhoods where the stonings have taken place circulated lists on Saturday naming more youths targeted to be killed if they do not change the way they dress.

38 posted on 03/18/2012 10:57:17 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill; Pining_4_TX
"Bush didn't just invade Iraq to depose of Saddam even though that was the pretext, it WAS to set up permanent bases there to counter any Iranian threats, even if the Shiites controlled Iraq.

Why counter Iranian threats, when the mullahs' regime could've been and still can be completely removed ? Isn't & wasn't that a better & more logical way?

I don't recall Iran being a threat to any country, at least not for 50 yrs before the mullahs (Khomeinist) regime came to power in 1979.

39 posted on 03/18/2012 3:20:40 PM PDT by odds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
Instead, we killed Saddam, let them choose worse as a PC gesture, started the “Islamic Spring” and just don’t get why it all went to hell.

I think you make excellent points. Would add that this "Islamic Spring" didn't start in 2010-2011. It started in 1979 with Khomeini and Iran. Carter and Brzezinski were in charge.

40 posted on 03/19/2012 7:01:09 PM PDT by odds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson