Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[READ!] HE PROMISED CHANGE IN WASHINGTON. THEN THE DEBT DEAL COLLAPSED. SO OBAMA CHANGED COURSE.
Washington Post ^ | Mar 18 2012 | BY PETER WALLSTEN, LORI MONTGOMERY AND SCOTT WILSON

Posted on 03/19/2012 11:17:21 AM PDT by Lazamataz

What happened? Obama and his advisers have cast the collapse of the talks as a republican failure. Boehner, unable to deliver, stepped away from the deal, simple as that.

But interviews with most of the central players in those talks— some ofwhomwere granted anonymity to speak about the secret negotiations — as well as a review of meeting notes, e-mails and the negotiating proposals that changed hands, offer a more complicated picture of the collapse. Obama, nervous about how to defend the emerging agreement to his own democratic base, upped the ante in a way that made it more difficult for Boehner— already facing long odds — to sell it to his party. Eventually, the president tried to put the original framework back in play, but by then it was too late. The moment of making history had passed.

(Excerpt) Read more at thewashingtonpost.newspaperdirect.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: boehner; creditrating; debtceiling; debtdeal; debtlimit; default; obama; obamalied; obamalies; presidentdowngrade; teaparty; teapartyterrorist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last
This is an incredibly important article. It demonstrates that Obama got EVERYTHING HE WANTED in the budget debt deal attempt, rejected it anyways, and the American Credit Rating was downgraded.

This URL looks like it will expire soon. I don't know if this article will be available elsewhere, but if it is, I will post the URL downthread.

1 posted on 03/19/2012 11:17:30 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Danae

Info ping. Credit Rush Limbaugh for bringing it to my attention. NYT article to follow on same topic.


2 posted on 03/19/2012 11:18:51 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator; Sidebar Moderator

This actually literally appears on the front page of the Washington Times Sunday edition, Mar 18, 2012, thusly why it is placed in Front Page sidebar.


3 posted on 03/19/2012 11:20:28 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

This is the Random Act of Journalism that Rush commented on today


4 posted on 03/19/2012 11:21:05 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
This is the Random Act of Journalism that Rush commented on today

Yessir. I was very surprised we hadn't had it posted somewhere on FR!!

5 posted on 03/19/2012 11:22:45 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

>> This URL looks like it will expire soon.

Read the firs page in the “e-replica” format, but it wants a login to read the rest. Bummer!

Front page is a real poke in Barky’s eye though. Considering the source it’s nothing short of astonishing.

Spin from Jay Carney in 5... 4... 3... 2... 1...


6 posted on 03/19/2012 11:27:31 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

bookmark


7 posted on 03/19/2012 11:29:41 AM PDT by nutmeg (Rest in Peace, and THANK YOU, Andrew Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
Read the firs page in the “e-replica” format, but it wants a login to read the rest. Bummer! Front page is a real poke in Barky’s eye though. Considering the source it’s nothing short of astonishing. Spin from Jay Carney in 5... 4... 3... 2... 1...

YUP! This is an amazing article. It shows Obama was directly responsible for the credit rating downgrade. Now, of course, this IS the Washington Post, so they weave in all sorts of 'noble Obama motives', none of which they could possibly know.... BUT.... the facts speak louder than the spin.

8 posted on 03/19/2012 11:32:17 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Share with everyone you know.

0bama’s “I can’t get any cooperation from the GOP” we knew was BS. This is just one (rather large and obscene) example.


9 posted on 03/19/2012 11:34:14 AM PDT by Tigercap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Good move. This one is worth bookmarking. Get it quick, though, who knows how long the URL will be good, it seems like an application that displays all newspapers they publish... so.. the next newspaper may overwrite this one....


10 posted on 03/19/2012 11:34:19 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Yessir. I was very surprised we hadn't had it posted somewhere on FR!!

Yeah, this is a growing trend I've been noticing for several weeks now. I always scan FR while having my moring coffee, then follow that by listening to Rush. In the past, I'd always read the news stories on FR before Rush talked about them, but enjoyed hearing his commentary on these items anyway. Now it seems that I always hear big news (like this WAPO article) from Rush first, then his listeners pick it up and post it on FR.

I don't know what to attribute this too. Any ideas?

11 posted on 03/19/2012 11:35:16 AM PDT by lonevoice (Klepto Baracka Marxo, impeach we much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tigercap; onyx; TheOldLady; trisham; Jim Robinson; Larry Lucido; Cyber Liberty; Travis McGee
Share with everyone you know. 0bama’s “I can’t get any cooperation from the GOP” we knew was BS. This is just one (rather large and obscene) example.

Any good ping lists that might be appropriate here?

12 posted on 03/19/2012 11:36:33 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Doesn’t matter. I’m just glad we have it.


13 posted on 03/19/2012 11:37:17 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obamas-evolution-behind-the-failed-grand-bargain-on-the-debt/2012/03/15/gIQAHyyfJS_print.html


14 posted on 03/19/2012 11:37:43 AM PDT by Excellence (9/11 was an act of faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Excellent. I wonder if WaPo understood how this would be perceived?


15 posted on 03/19/2012 11:38:34 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I tried snagging the text by printing to a PDF but it didn’t all come through. I don’t have an WaPo account but maybe someone who does could make sure a copy is kept somewhere.

Seems to me that either:

A) Obama lied and changed his mind later, killing the deal
or
B) This was a set-up from the get-go, and their entire goal was to lull the R’s into thinking they had a deal so in the end they could be left holding the empty bag.

Either way, if any of this is true it says Boehner/Cantor were more than willing to accept a tax increase as part of the deal, and that is just the kind of crap we don’t need.

But if the downgrade can truly be pinned on Obama, that won’t matter as this could be a game-changer.


16 posted on 03/19/2012 11:38:34 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Excellence

Excellence, that was EXCELLENCE. Thank you.


17 posted on 03/19/2012 11:39:14 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

As Rush is talking about now, this demonstrates that Boehner and McConnell were ready to accept tax increases, in spite of them saying publicly that they would not. I don’t think this will surprise a lot of FReepers, but I still think it’s a big effen deal [®Joe Biden]


18 posted on 03/19/2012 11:40:08 AM PDT by lonevoice (Klepto Baracka Marxo, impeach we much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Rush speculated that this might be a Clinton-style get-this-out-early so that you can scream “OLD NEWS” in October.


19 posted on 03/19/2012 11:40:47 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I “snagged” it. If anyone wants it, email me.


20 posted on 03/19/2012 11:41:49 AM PDT by Tigercap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice
As Rush is talking about now, this demonstrates that Boehner and McConnell were ready to accept tax increases, in spite of them saying publicly that they would not. I don’t think this will surprise a lot of FReepers, but I still think it’s a big effen deal [®Joe Biden]

In this case, I cut the boys slack, because it was clear they were calling the bluff.

21 posted on 03/19/2012 11:42:03 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tigercap

Hooah.


22 posted on 03/19/2012 11:42:23 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Well I certainly wouldn't put it past the Fab Four to dream up such a plan during their daily conference call.
23 posted on 03/19/2012 11:46:07 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Thanks. I’ve been listening to Rush discuss this all afternoon.


24 posted on 03/19/2012 11:48:49 AM PDT by nhwingut (Sarah Palin 12... No One Else (Maybe Tim Thomas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Here's the reason:

The Democrats leaked the story to the Post (and NYT).

Why?

Because there will be another debt limit fight coming up before the election!

This is because of the Payroll tax "cut" the Dems and Obama pushed through. This is increasing the deficit beyond the value calculated to last until the election is over.

When the debt limit issue comes up again, the Dems will insist on the Repubs raising taxes and will use this as the bludgeon - "see, they were willing to increase taxes last time, ..."

25 posted on 03/19/2012 11:48:49 AM PDT by eCSMaster (Conservative patriots, Rise up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster

Brilliant on your part.


26 posted on 03/19/2012 11:49:51 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster

Good catch. That could very well be the plan.


27 posted on 03/19/2012 11:55:47 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Thank you but I can’t claim credit. MissesBush posted it earlier.


28 posted on 03/19/2012 12:10:09 PM PDT by Excellence (9/11 was an act of faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Excellence

I love you anyway.


29 posted on 03/19/2012 12:19:54 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice
this demonstrates that Boehner and McConnell were ready to accept tax increases

No, they were going to close loopholes, not raise tax rates. They were clear about that. From the article:

Another key caveat: Much of the $800 billion would have to come from overhauling the tax code — not from higher tax rates. The Republicans believed lower rates and a simpler code

30 posted on 03/19/2012 12:24:06 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
Good catch. That could very well be the plan.

Agreed. However, I don't think it will work with independent voters. A fight over raising the debt limit during October will bode very poorly for all incumbents, particularly POTUS.

I could be wrong, but I think the tsunami will hit the last weekend before the vote, just as it did against Carter. Millions of voters will ask themselves, "do I really want another 4 years of Obama, and all that entails?

After a summer of $4+ gas, high inflation on food and other staples, I think the answer will be a resounding NO!

31 posted on 03/19/2012 12:24:08 PM PDT by Night Hides Not (My dream ticket for 2012 is John Galt & Dagny Taggart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Spin from Jay Carney in 5... 4... 3... 2... 1...

Carney is a very talented spin artist, especially compared to Gibbs. I hate the guy's guts, but I respect his ability immensely.

32 posted on 03/19/2012 12:34:03 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The RNC would prefer Obama to a conservative nominee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

The news in this is not Obama’s actions, it is that the WaPo wrote about. Obama was acting in standard community activist negotiating fashion.


33 posted on 03/19/2012 12:34:23 PM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Romney's judicial appointments were more radical than Obama's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Either that or “gas prices and a deteriorating world security situation are going to savage Barry so badly over the next few months, we here at Media House have to assist our brothers in the Democrat Party with kicking him to the curb before it’s too late.”


34 posted on 03/19/2012 12:34:46 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I was surprised there wasn’t more talk and noise about this at the time.....even from conservatives. Maybe they were embarrassed about Boehner agreeing to any taxes and preferred that the deal sink.


35 posted on 03/19/2012 12:37:00 PM PDT by cookcounty (Newt 2012: ---> Because he got it DONE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

Carney and Gibbs are/were temedulously aided by a syncophantic press pool including Tapper. Tapper is seen from a mile away and waits for Carney/Gibbs to “finish”.


36 posted on 03/19/2012 12:42:47 PM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: All

I’m pretty impressed with the level of analytics exhibited by the freepers comments in this thread. It’s like the old days, when cogency and good thinkers were abundant. Perhaps the nature of this thread drives away the more frivilous freepers.....

..... you know, like that detestable Lazamataz.


37 posted on 03/19/2012 12:47:53 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
Millions of voters will ask themselves, "do I really want another 4 years of Obama, and all that entails their End-trails?

Their fixed it :-)..

38 posted on 03/19/2012 12:49:38 PM PDT by taildragger (( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
C'mon Laz, your tagline simply oozes cogency and superb analytics.

There are plenty of threads for frivolous Freepers...we're doing hugh and series work here.

39 posted on 03/19/2012 1:07:41 PM PDT by Night Hides Not (My dream ticket for 2012 is John Galt & Dagny Taggart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

You are correct. If I had any sense at all, I’d hijack this thread to complain about either contraceptives or abortion.


40 posted on 03/19/2012 1:14:49 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty ("If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." --Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Some early thoughts on this article:

1. It shows that Boehner was feeling the heat that we were discussing here at the time, that the mid-term elections gave the Republicans a lot of political capital, and that we felt that Boehner was too timid to use it.

2, The White House had a dismissive view of Boehner as Speaker. They may have been talking about the state of the GOP caucus, or they may have been talking about Boehner's leadership abilities.

Obama’s aides were under strict orders to “protect Boehner” and not talk about his private entreaties. Obama liked Boehner; they got along well during the private sessions and a round of golf. But there was doubt in the White House as to whether the speaker could bring his party along. He “probably could not deliver a pizza,” was one administration aide’s skeptical assessment.

3. Democrats do not negotiate in good faith. They lie. The coin of Congress is the promise. Negotations (debates) in Congress are about trading promise of this in Bill 1 in exchange for promise of that in Bill 2. When Democrats get Bill 1 and then reneg on promises in Bill 2, trust is destroyed and negotiations are a fruitless sham.

4. Interesting admissions of connections.

A. Obama liked Boehner; they got along well during the private sessions and a round of golf.

B. Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.), one of Boehner’s dearest friends.

C. Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), was close to Obama and Boehner... [Coburn] had developed a close personal bond with Obama dating to their shared opposition to federal budget earmarks when both were senators.

D. Obama invoked Boehner’s personal friendship with Chambliss, a member of the Gang of Six, warning that Democrats would never support the package under discussion when “your friend Saxby...” Everything is personal to Obama.

5. I was right back when this happened, that the biggest mistake that Boehner made was walking away from Senate negotiations and letting Obama into the talks. This was always rightfully a Congressional discussion only, and Boehner let the White House in a full participants (in Boehner's mind) and not recognizing that Obama would usurp the floor and take over, making the GOP House look like weak fools. I originally posted this:

I still think it's a mistake to bypass the Senate Democrats and take this directly to Obama.

Anything Obama agrees to still has to pass the Senate, which has not even passed its own budget resolution yet.

Furthermore, this just gives Obama another platform to look "presidential" going into the 2012 election. It also gives the MSM another issue to pound Republicans with until they cave in to pressure.

Republicans instead should have put the pressure on Harry Reid to get the Senate to go on record with a budget plan of their own, and continue to make Obama look like the bystander that he really is.

I also wrote this:

Republicans gave away all of their leverage during the lame duck session of the 111th Congress.

They were slow to get started in the 112th Congress.

And now they're getting played again by allowing the Senate to be marginalized, and making everything be between the House and Obama.

McConnell should stay out of it until the Senate goes on record with a budget, otherwise, all he's doing is mucking up the works by being a powerless voice who can nothing but undermine his side's position.

6. Up to this moment, Obama was starting to look to be marginalized and aimless. Boehner and McConnell gave Obama new wind behind his sails when it wasn't necessary. That was the biggest blunder the GOP could do.

Suddenly, the same Democrats who had accused Obama of meekness in negotiating with the GOP were praising his aggressive new tone. What happened during those days in July when the grand bargain was almost reached, but not quite, had changed him. He no longer seemed divided.

-PJ

41 posted on 03/19/2012 1:19:11 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you can vote for President, then your children can run for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

PJ, Thank you. Will read in great detail in a bit but a scan looks like you have some interesting input.


42 posted on 03/19/2012 1:31:30 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Here a new twist.

Could this article have been timed to provide proof of claims made in this new book being released?

Obama blamed troubles on Fox News, book says

In “Showdown: The Inside Story of How Obama Fought Back Against Boehner, Cantor, and the Tea Party” — which hits bookstores on Tuesday — the Washington bureau chief for Mother Jones chronicles the White House from the 2010 midterm elections to the start of the 2012 campaign. The book focuses on key moments of Obama’s presidency, such as Osama bin Laden’s assassination, the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, the Arab Spring, the debt ceiling crisis, and the president’s dealings with Congress.

-PJ

43 posted on 03/19/2012 1:35:19 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you can vote for President, then your children can run for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

You mean before “The Purge” when we had more cogency and clear thinkers.


44 posted on 03/19/2012 1:38:17 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
You mean before “The Purge” when we had more cogency and clear thinkers

Be careful... comments like THAT might get YOU purged! You've probably already been reported by 2-3.

45 posted on 03/19/2012 1:45:48 PM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner

We made it, though. Anyways, back to the article.....


46 posted on 03/19/2012 1:48:22 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Low down dirty dogs, all of them. I’m so disgusted!


47 posted on 03/19/2012 1:50:25 PM PDT by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Rush has mentioned several times that Obama’s approval rating was down to 41%, do you know what poll that was and where to find it?


48 posted on 03/19/2012 1:52:08 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster
No matter what the Dummycrats say, the national debt has increased by $5 Trillion. In addition under Obama, the country's credit rating was downgraded. Why, because Obama was playing political games. I'm outraged. Period. This is a disgrace and if the GOP and FOX do not make hay of this we deserve another four years of Obama.
49 posted on 03/19/2012 2:08:05 PM PDT by Chgogal (WSJ, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et al., STFU. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: what's up

You’re right, the Republicans were not agreeing to a tax increase, they were talking about closing loopholes and simplifying the tax code. The Democrats wanted targeted tax increases.


50 posted on 03/19/2012 2:17:31 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson