Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sixty years on, the B-52 is still going strong
CNET ^ | April 15, 2012 | by Jonathan E. Skillings

Posted on 04/15/2012 6:32:45 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

Along with the ICBM, it was one of the defining pieces of military technology during the Cold War: the B-52 bomber.

Those who grew up in the 1960s and 1970s knew the B-52 Stratofortress as a central figure in the anxiety that flowed from the protracted staring match between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. On the one hand, it was reassuring to know that the Strategic Air Command was ready at a moment's notice to scramble its B-52s to counter any potential nuclear attack. On the other hand, if the bombers were flying that mission, well, things might well have ended badly for everyone.

But while the nuclear-tinged Cold War has come and, thankfully, gone, the B-52 is still going strong. And this after a half-century of service.

It was 60 years ago today, on April 15, 1952, that a B-52 prototype built by Boeing took off on its maiden flight. The 1950s-vintage B-52s are no longer in the U.S. Air Force inventory, but the 90 or so that remain on active duty (a total of 744 were built, counting all models) aren't that much younger. They're all the H model of the B-52, delivered between May 1961 and October 1962. That means the youngest is on the cusp of its 50th birthday.

That feat of longevity reflects both regular maintenance and timely upgrades -- in the late 1980s, for instance, GPS capabilities were incorporated into the navigation system.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.cnet.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aerospace; b52; boeing; buf; coldwar; military; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

1 posted on 04/15/2012 6:32:56 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Good ol’ American know how!


2 posted on 04/15/2012 6:37:07 PM PDT by rfreedom4u (Just because someone thinks it's a good idea doesn't make it legal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Always loved watching them take off from Carswell AFB in Ft Worth. Two B-52s, followed by a KC-135. Their saggy wings would gradually lift as they reached take off speed. Hard to see much after that, though. Buffers were pretty smoky.


3 posted on 04/15/2012 6:38:22 PM PDT by edpc (Wilby 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I’m sure she was a fine bird in her time, but I’m also pretty sure she should have been retired L-O-N-G ago.


4 posted on 04/15/2012 6:40:37 PM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer



5 posted on 04/15/2012 6:41:22 PM PDT by left that other site
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Photobucket
6 posted on 04/15/2012 6:42:28 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

>>Along with the ICBM, it was one of the defining pieces of military technology during the Cold War: the B-52 bomber.

Hey, what about the SSBN, which is the only leg of the strategic deterrent triad still viable?!?

41 for Freedom!


7 posted on 04/15/2012 6:45:02 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Duke
Why? To be replaced by what? The B52 is essentially only the second generation of metal clad bombers after the B17/B24/25 WWII era generation. Yeah, we had the B36 and B47, impressive craft in their own right, but they never made the impact the B52 did.

Like the battleship, the B52 represents the apex of evolution of a system. It would take a saltatory leap to render it obsolete. The B1 and B2 are out there, but when we needed a craft to loiter around the Afghan plain, only one airplane filled the bill.

8 posted on 04/15/2012 6:49:35 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: edpc
I'm a mile from the threshold of the former Carswell AFB. It's now a Naval Air Station/Joint Reserve Base.

Born and grew up here, and now I'm back. Saw/heard Hustlers crack a bedroom window going supersonic.

Saw the MITO take-offs. One BUFF after another, water injection on, roaring. I was probably 6, standing in my back yard, fingers in my ears, spring in the air, and feeling my chest cavity viberate from the sound.

And they were smokey, back in the day.

I did wind up in the AF eventually. TAC, not SAC, first time around.

/johnny

9 posted on 04/15/2012 6:50:27 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Duke
Why get rid of a winner that's cost effective?

/johnny

10 posted on 04/15/2012 6:51:51 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
Think about this: That awesome craft was designed by guys with slide rules intead of computers.

God is in his heaven and all is right with the world.

11 posted on 04/15/2012 6:52:33 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
Think about this: That awesome craft was designed by guys with slide rules instead of computers.

God is in his heaven and all is right with the world.

12 posted on 04/15/2012 6:52:53 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

bump johnny #9.


13 posted on 04/15/2012 6:55:16 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

There’s something else about the Buff, as evidenced from EGPWS’ pic above:

The B-52 isn’t subtle. There’s no stealth. There’s no “environmental impact assessment.” From the moment the throttles go forward, the outward message of a B-52 rolling off the runway is:

“We are coming to kill you. We don’t care who knows. We’re not going to be crafty, stealthy, quiet or nuanced. When the bomb bay doors open, you will see a seemingly limitless succession of bombs drop out of this beast upon your head. Enjoy your last moments.”

Look back at what happened when Nixon finally bombed North Vietnam with B-52’s instead of attack or fighter aircraft. The Commies came back to the table right damn quick...

If we practiced a foreign policy of “speak softly and carry a big stick,” the B-52 is the biggest, ugliest piece of wood one could carry around.


14 posted on 04/15/2012 6:56:06 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

15 posted on 04/15/2012 6:56:35 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (I think in about 5 - no, 4 - years I'll have had enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
That awesome craft was designed by guys with slide rules instead of computers.

That's not possible, according to the bean-counters.

I once worked out an engineering solution on a quadrille pad with a pencil at a meeting, and it included some greek characters! Oh, my! Basic algebra. No integration or anything.

I presented the solution and got told by the bean counters that I would have to explain some of it, and they wouldn't sign off until they understood it.

3 weeks later....it was the same answer down to 4 decimal places.

/johnny

16 posted on 04/15/2012 7:03:28 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
That feat of longevity reflects both regular maintenance and timely upgrades

There are other factors as well ... the "H" BUFF, or "Cadillac" was the penultimate penetration version of the type. It was optimized for low-level operations from the start, with a stronger wing and fuselage structure than it's older sisters.

Additionally, it entered service after the bomber-leg of the triad had switched from airborne alert (many planes in the air, loaded with nukes, at all times) to ground-based alert - so most of the "H" fleet spent the first 2/3rds of their careers mostly on the ground being pampered, rather than racking up flight hours. Besides missing airborne alert (which saw the wings flown off the earlier marks up to the "G", as well as the B-47 fleet) the "H" also didn't see service in Vietnam or Desert Storm (aside: whenever Libs used to gloat that the B-1B didn't see service in Desert Storm, the quick/easy response was that it was sitting nuke alert just like all the "H" model BUFFs -- it was the "G" that went to war).

So when the "H"s switched to the conventional mission with the retirement of the "G"s in the 1990s, there was this near-perfect convergence of chronologically "old" but very low-flight-time, exceptionally strong airframes that were generally flying missions (combat or training) at a much higher altitude (since the low-level penetration mission is long-gone) then they were designed for - which further served to limit airframe fatigue.

The same thing is true of both the B-1B and the B-2A fleet btw. Those aircraft were optimized for low-level performance as well and their current operational usage means that we'll get a heck of a lot more flight hours out of them than originally projected.
17 posted on 04/15/2012 7:03:46 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

Likewise and more. The Buffs used to fly almost directly overhead on their landing pattern for Carswell. I lived just west (1/4 mile or so)of the primary runway and just north of the West Freeway. I could almost count rivets as they flew overhead. Always a treat to see them as well as comforting to know they were always on the job.


18 posted on 04/15/2012 7:07:40 PM PDT by miele man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rfreedom4u

Slide Rules Rule!


19 posted on 04/15/2012 7:08:57 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Most amazing thing I ever saw there was a British Vulcan bomber in the ‘83 airshow. It performed maneuvers I never believed possible in an aircraft of its class.


20 posted on 04/15/2012 7:10:36 PM PDT by edpc (Wilby 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson