Those frauds at Snopes can't even keep their stories straight!
Back to the thread; check out # 153.
Thanks, Brown Deer. (Never expect the truth from a dem.)
Posted on 05/07/2012 12:42:10 PM PDT by GregNH
Rush Limbaugh, the nation’s top-rated radio talk-show host, briefly brought up the issue of Barack Obama’s potentially criminal use of a Connecticut-based Social Security Number, since the president has never lived in the Constitution State.
While speaking with a caller named Rob about Obama’s alleged deception of citizens, Limbaugh tossed out the question: “What are your thoughts on the fact Obama’s Social Security Number is from Connecticut and he’s never been there?”
Rob responded, “That’s what you call a red flag. A red flag is also, ‘First of all, I don’t need to give you my birth certificate,’ and then finally, ‘I’ll give you a copy,’ Oh, that’s a modern copy … We don’t need copies, we need originals.”
Rob continued, “How about releasing all of your college papers and let’s see what you really thought about America when you were in college? He’s deceiving us.”
“That’s true,” said Limbaugh. “They don’t want [us] to see what those term papers, doctoral theses and so forth actually were about, nor do they want us to see the grades. They don’t want us to see the grades.”
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Was this recently? (Just curious)
Was this recently? (Just curious)
____________________
No, but within the last year. He refers to FR or Freepers in a way that only Freepers understand.
1. His GPA is lower than Dubya's.
2. He is an affirmative action baby.
3. He majored in ethnic studies.
Just sayin'.
Those frauds at Snopes can't even keep their stories straight!
Back to the thread; check out # 153.
Thanks, Brown Deer. (Never expect the truth from a dem.)
We’ve been through this before. If you want to post their published documents and procedures from 1977, then feel free to do so, otherwise why don’t you just stop posting your nonsense?
What the Hell are you talking about? This is an official USG website. It represents official USG policy, whether you agree with it or not. In order to deal with the other side, you have to know what the facts are.
Go to this Selective Service System site
Type in Obama for last name
Input SSN (no hyphens): 042684425
Input date of birth no slashes: 08041961
And voila you get the name Barack Hussein Obama and selective service # 61-1125539-1
You are an idiot. Get lost.
No moron, you’re the idiot.
Wouldn’t have been ‘61, as O’s SSN would have been applied for later...
Brown deer, I forgot....
couples “married filing jointly” put both their SSN on the tax return; is that where they found the second number, her number?
Still have the question of when the Connecticut-based number started to be used by 0.
“Would you like to try something using another government site? The results might amaze you.
Go to this Selective Service System site
Type in Obama for last name
Input SSN (no hyphens): 042684425
Input date of birth no slashes: 08041961
And voila you get the name Barack Hussein Obama and selective service # 61-1125539-1”
Kabar,
I went to that site and input the above data and got the same name, app date, and selective service number.
This verifies there is information there....
BUT
when we look at the application card that was mailed in, the postmark is one day earlier than the date it was signed.
And, as another freeper pointed out, the card sequence number prefix “08” doesn’t agree with “80”, which is what one would expect if it had been issued in 1980.
Also note the “NO ID” box near thethe postmark has been checked.
So the online information has been culled from a fraudulent origination document.
It is, IMNSVHO, eerily similar similar to what appears to have happened with the "Birth Certificate." The HIDOH claims to have released "a digital abstract of data on file," which the Obama Team then cut and pasted into a new, digitally created "document," purporting to be a "certified copy" of a BC on file in HI.
Sheriff Joe's guys figured it out. Since there never was a "document," all one needed was thoroughness; not brilliance.
As a result, more work needs to be done using that SSN and selective service #. I have always believed that Obama applied for his Selective Service # well after he was required to do it (more than likely to assist his political ambitions.) Hence, the fraudulent attempt to backdate it with the "80" without the 19. I would attempt to find out if Obama's SS #61-1125539 actually falls within the timeframe he allegedly applied for it, i.e., Sept 4, 1980. I assume that the numbers are issued consecutively and chronologically. I also assume that the #61 applies to his year of birth, so the numbers would be issued consecutively based on age cohort regardless of when the application was filed.
As far as I know, the Cold Case Posse did not pursue that route of investigation, just that the time stamp appears to be fraudulent. I assume that the request for microfilm copies could resolve it. Or if someone who was issued a selective service number around the same time and year of birth could just interrogate the same SSA system and find out what number was issued to them. I couldn't do that because I was born prior to 1960. In fact, I received my SS # when I graduated HS in 1961. My selective service # does not follow the numbering system that was used to assign Obama's number. It was irrelevant since I wound up serving 8 years as a naval officer after completing college in 1965.
I would encourage male FReepers to interrogate the system and find their selective service number to see what comes up so we can figure out how the numbering system works.
According to the Wayback Machine, the note has been on that site since at least 2001.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.