Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The question of President Obama's draft card: Has evidence been destroyed?
Washington Times ^ | May 07, 2012 | Alan Jones

Posted on 05/08/2012 9:53:18 AM PDT by Smokeyblue

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: Smokeyblue
Changes in the wording of Selective Service System record-keeping requirements, made days after the opening of an investigation

Same with Social Security numbers by residence state and destroying passport and other gov records.

21 posted on 05/08/2012 10:22:15 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thouworm

IMPORTANT MESSAGE

CHANGE TO PRE-1960 SELECTIVE SERVICE RECORDS REQUEST

National Archives and Records Administration has sole responsibility of ownership, storage, and retrieval of Selective Service records for men born before 1960. Consequently, Selective Service can no longer access any of these records.

All requests should be mailed directly to:

National Archives & Records Administration
National Archives at St. Louis
ATTN: RL-SL
P.O. Box 38757
St. Louis, MO 63138-0757


22 posted on 05/08/2012 10:23:16 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


23 posted on 05/08/2012 10:23:33 AM PDT by thouworm (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

yea, nothing to see here...

of course, even a normal person with below average intelligence could spot this cover up


24 posted on 05/08/2012 10:23:58 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten

Nothing to see here ... because it was destroyed ...


25 posted on 05/08/2012 10:31:16 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
I just verified Obama's SS registration. Go to this site.

Type in Obama for last name

Input SSN (not hyphens): 042684425

Input date of birth no slashes: 08041961

And voila you get the name Barack Hussein Obama and selective service # 61-1125539-1

26 posted on 05/08/2012 10:35:42 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser

I believe there is The People, and there is The Government.

“Battle lines being drawn . . . .” - and NOT drawn by The People.


27 posted on 05/08/2012 10:36:18 AM PDT by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bgill; Smokeyblue
Obama Passport ---

I don't think this new Cashill article has been posted as a thread on FR. Nothing new, but it is a good review of the facts, and it updates Sheriff Joe's interest.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Among the unexpected findings of the Sheriff Arpaio cold case was this one:

"Records of Immigration and Naturalization Service cards filled out by airplane passengers arriving on international flights originating outside the United States in the month of August 1961, examined at the National Archives in Washington, D.C. are missing records for the week of President Obama's birth, including the dates Aug. 1, 1961 through Aug. 7, 1961."

Time for New Look at 2008 Obama Passport Breach By Jack Cashill, May 5, 2012

28 posted on 05/08/2012 10:37:51 AM PDT by thouworm (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

It is my understanding, also that the evidence of fraud isn’t just in the USPS “received” stamp. The upper right encoding does not follow SS guidance in effect at that time.

One glaring error is that the first 2 digits should be the same as the last two digits of the year of registration. In Obamugabe’s case, that would meen the registration card code should start with ^80^. Since it begins with an ^08^, his card was part of a batch of cards that was intended to be used on either 1908 or 2008.

I’m thinking that the CCP knows this and is withholding to trump the butt-lackey press.


29 posted on 05/08/2012 10:40:39 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
"The new rules allow existing copies of documents that may be sought by investigators to be destroyed."

At the risk of repeating myself:
What new rule?
Which Department issued the new rule?
Which Office in that Department issued that new rule?
Which person in that Office in that Department issued the new rule?
Who authorized the new rule?
Which Cogressional Committee is investigating that new rule?

WHY AM NOT SURPRSED AT THE ASWERS?

30 posted on 05/08/2012 10:42:28 AM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

The onus is on the individual to prove him/her-self up to meet the qualifications set by the government (employer)...not the other way around. This jackwad gets away with it. Let’s see how many records these scumbags destroyed and the effect on future requirements to be met. They may have over cleaned.


31 posted on 05/08/2012 10:46:21 AM PDT by SgtHooper (The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I am Richard Brandon

Might start your search with the Federal Register.

From the article:

The Selective Service System’s new privacy rules were published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, September 20, 2011


32 posted on 05/08/2012 10:48:26 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue; thouworm; TheOldLady; tomdavidd; Freeper; Gvl_M3; Flotsam_Jetsome; Berlin_Freeper; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Previously unnoticed, the new rules allow the government to destroy microfilm copies of Selective Service registration records and may create new obstacles for law enforcement agencies that are requesting records access for investigative purposes.

Article, then # 17 , # 23.

Thanks, Smokeyblue. Too late 0hbummer, we already know.

33 posted on 05/08/2012 10:51:21 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

Criminal....


34 posted on 05/08/2012 10:52:22 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingextremist1776

Everything about this guy is phony.


35 posted on 05/08/2012 11:01:18 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (The President who ate the dog, will soon wag the dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: I am Richard Brandon; Smokeyblue

We have a tyranny run by federal employees who make up smack any time and way they want and their “rules and regulations” are all of a sudden federal law. No votes, no sunlight, nothing. Just all of a sudden “voila! New laws! We can do whatever we want and you (and Congress) have no say!”

They had their revolution and no one has noticed (well, here on FR some have).


36 posted on 05/08/2012 11:02:15 AM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

Except that he’s stupid, evil, commie, muzzie lover, ilegal and a sex pervert.


37 posted on 05/08/2012 11:04:23 AM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
“We believe they are stonewalling,” Zullo added.

Never a doubt. Bad people = bad government.

38 posted on 05/08/2012 11:15:04 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
I've gone from, "What is he hiding and why?" to just straight out, "Who is this guy?" It's as if a complete unknown became President of the United States. What we now know is still very murky. We knew nothing in 2008. .
39 posted on 05/08/2012 11:21:28 AM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thouworm

The stamp says July 29. The date signed says July 30. Was there time travel involved?


40 posted on 05/08/2012 11:33:06 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson