Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Last Line of Defense
National Journal ^ | May 24, 2012 | Ronald Brownstein

Posted on 05/27/2012 12:24:27 PM PDT by neverdem

The new round of national and state surveys this week generally showing President Obama clinging to a tenuous advantage over Republican Mitt Romney reinforce the conclusion that socially liberal, upscale white women may stand as the president's indispensable line of defense in his struggle for reelection.

Both the national ABC/Washington Post survey released earlier this week, and the NBC/Marist Polls released Thursday in the battleground states of Ohio, Virginia and Florida show Obama retaining preponderant support among minority voters who were critical to his 2008 victory. Conversely, in almost all of the surveys, Obama faces a consistent pattern of erosion from his already meager 2008 levels of support among whites without a college education.

In both the national and battleground polls, college-educated white voters loom as a more conflicted and contested group-with Obama generally struggling among the men, but maintaining his support among the women better than many Democratic candidates did in the 2010 GOP Congressional landslide. Combined with Obama's minority support, that was enough to keep him ahead of Romney in all four of these national and state surveys-though not quite enough in any case to push the president past the 50 percent marker that allows incumbents to sleep better. "I think those women are pretty solid," says Democratic pollster Geoff Garin, who is advising a pro-Obama Super PAC. "Of all the things that keep me up at night, they are at the bottom of the list."

Different strategists focus on different fissures in the electorate (particularly the white electorate) when explaining the coalitions of support aligning behind the two parties. Some emphasize marital status, noting that single women vote much more heavily Democratic than married women. (In 2008, Obama won almost three-fifths of white single women and lost almost three-fifths of white married women, according to the exit polls.) Others stress age, noting that Democrats now usually run better with younger than older white voters. Among whites, the frequency of church attendance is now also a more powerful predictor of voting behavior than income.

Yet education levels have also proved a consistent thread in the shifting pattern of each party's support. In each of the past three elections, the Democratic nominee has performed better among white voters with a college education than white voters without one, reversing the pattern evident from at least the 1940s through the 1980s. And in every election since 1988, the Democratic nominee has performed better among college-educated white women than among any of the other three elements of the white education and gender quadrant: white men with a college degree, and white men and women without one. Along with the growing minority population, which comprised 26 percent of the 2008 vote, those women (who cast just under 18 percent of the ballots last time) have emerged as a pillar of the Democratic coalition. These women look especially critical to Obama's hopes this time because of the consistent signs that he's losing ground among other whites, especially those without college degrees.

The new surveys underscore the durability of Obama's strength with minority voters. In 2008, according to exit polls, Obama won a cumulative 80 percent of the vote among all non-white voters. The new surveys show him continuing to perform in that range. In this week's ABC/Washington Post survey, Obama led Romney among all non-white respondents by a margin of 77 percent to 19 percent, virtually unchanged from April. According to data provided by the Marist College Institute for Public Opinion's Lee Miringoff and Stephanie Calvano, Obama drew 84 percent of non-white voters in Ohio and 74 percent in Virginia; in Florida, where NBC/Marist reported the results separately, Obama lead 89 percent to 5 percent among African-Americans, and 55 percent to 36 percent among Latinos.

At the other end of the spectrum, Obama posted weak performances among working-class whites in all four surveys. In the national ABC/Post poll, Obama drew just 34 percent of non-college white men (down from 39 percent in the national 2008 exit poll), and 35 percent of non-college white women (down from 41 percent in 2008). In Ohio, the NBC/Marist survey gave Obama 41 percent of non-college white women and 40 percent of non-college white men; in Florida he drew just 37 percent of the working-class white men and 36 percent of the women; in Virginia, just 32 percent of the women and 31 percent of the men. These results are consistent with an array of recent polls showing Obama facing anemic numbers among working-class whites.

Among white men with a college degree, Obama's numbers are also modest across all four surveys. The NBC/Marist Polls show him winning just 40 percent of them in Virginia, 36 percent in Ohio and 34 percent in Florida. The ABC/Washington Post survey is more promising for him: it shows him capturing 44 percent of those college white men, comparable to the 42 percent he won nationally in 2008, according to the Edison Research exit poll.

In all four polls, though, Obama runs much better with the college-educated white women than any other segment of the white electorate. In the ABC/Washington Post national survey he draws 51 percent; that's down from the elevated 60 percent the poll showed him attracting in April, but almost exactly even with the 52 percent he captured among those women last time. (ABC Pollster Gary Langer points out that even that nine percentage point drop is within the margin of errors for the two surveys.) Obama also wins 51 percent of those college white women in both the Ohio and Virginia state polls, and 44 percent among them in Florida. That's significantly better than his performance among the other three parts of the white quadrant in all three states.

Garin, the Democratic pollster, says he's confident of Obama's ability to maintain his support with these upscale white women. "They're not going anywhere," he says. "Unlike young people who I describe as having been Obama-cized and not politicized, these college women are Democrats. They have been driven out by the Republican Party. Obama is far more aligned with their values and priorities, and they are just in a very different place from the republican party...in terms of fundamental questions of the role of government and what's the country's priorities ought to be and on the social and cultural agenda."

Kristen Soltis, a Republican pollster, acknowledges that Obama has made inroads with these women around social issues such as contraception and gay marriage. "What I don't know is whether that pattern is sustainable," she says. "I don't know if you can sustain the 'war on women' narrative for months and months. Because, ultimately the economy is going to decide things."

If Obama stays close to his 2008 level of support among minority voters and maintains or slightly increases their turnout, Romney has to capture about 60 percent of whites to reach a national majority. The good news for him is Republicans reached exactly that level among whites in the 2010 Congressional elections, according to the Edison Research exit poll.

But in scaling that height, Republicans benefited from a movement in their direction from all whites. In 2010, the GOP not only drove down the Democratic vote to 35 percent or less among white men and women without a college degree and college-educated men, but reduced the Democratic numbers among college white women to just 43 percent, according to the exit poll. (Democrats did much better with those college women in some key Senate races, including California and Colorado.)

If Obama can maintain majority support among those well-educated women, while remaining close to his four-fifths support among minorities, the president can win a national majority while capturing only a little more than one-third of all other whites. Even that isn't impossible for Romney: In 2010, Republicans actually held Democrats to about that level of support with those other whites. But it's not a hill Romney should want to climb: no Republican presidential nominee since 1988 has dominated the other three quadrants of the white electorate to quite that overwhelming extent.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Mexico; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: District of Columbia; US: Florida; US: Kentucky; US: Massachusetts; US: New Jersey; US: New York; US: Ohio; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: california; districtofcolumbia; florida; iran; iraq; kentucky; massachusetts; mexico; newjersey; obama; ohio; texas; virginia
If Obama stays close to his 2008 level of support among minority voters and maintains or slightly increases their turnout, Romney has to capture about 60 percent of whites to reach a national majority. The good news for him is Republicans reached exactly that level among whites in the 2010 Congressional elections, according to the Edison Research exit poll.

That percentage of the white vote in 2010 was a first. There's no economic reason to expect it to not increase. Obama got a bad situation and made it worse.

It's his ideology, stupid!

1 posted on 05/27/2012 12:24:37 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Obama is damaged goods and does not have a chance. The Democrat Centrists Romney is ahead. I hope the GOOP pulls their heads out and gets a real Republican.
2 posted on 05/27/2012 12:42:20 PM PDT by mountainlion (I am voting for Sarah after getting screwed again by the DC Thugs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I sense another 1980 shaping up...at this point in the spring of ‘80 Carter led Reagan by double digits...as the msm claimed Reagan was just too conservative for the American people.

We know how that turned out.


3 posted on 05/27/2012 12:42:56 PM PDT by kjo (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; GOPsterinMA; randita; Sun; LdSentinal; ...

College-educated white women who are unmarried are indeed Obama’s last line of defense. He’ll win them this year, but not by the same margin he won them in 2008. The same applies to the youth vote, who will support him again but not with the same margins and turnout levels as last time. We should also see Obama’s margin drop among Jewish voters, as well.


4 posted on 05/27/2012 12:48:36 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Obama and Company lied, the American economy died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It’s ironic that a Marxist has such weak support from “working class” whites (most of whom probably don’t identify themselves primarily by “class,” whatever that is). The Marxists are supposed to be the vanguard of the proletariat. Somehow the American proletariat didn’t get the message.


5 posted on 05/27/2012 12:56:24 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I honestly think that Romney will win in a landslide. Unfortunately, Romney will think the lanslide was the result of his good looks and govern like the Massachussetts liberal that he is!


6 posted on 05/27/2012 12:57:12 PM PDT by old school
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
I agree, turn out is everything. They are screaming against the voter ID laws in the swing states because they always played by the rules that if we can only get close, our fraud will see us through. They know they can not even get close without the fraud this time.
7 posted on 05/27/2012 12:59:59 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Maintaining turnout is a big problem for him this time round.
Disenchantment abounds.


8 posted on 05/27/2012 1:06:31 PM PDT by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
College-educated white women who are unmarried are indeed Obama’s last line of defense. He’ll win them this year, but not by the same margin he won them in 2008. The same applies to the youth vote, who will support him again but not with the same margins and turnout levels as last time. We should also see Obama’s margin drop among Jewish voters, as well.

Obama is going to be hard pressed about turnout from blacks and latinos too. Blacks have been let down with respect to tangible benefits that they were expecting from the "first black president." Their pols are expected to bring home the bacon. Latinos were hoping for amnesty. It doesn't matter that those expectations were "pie in the sky" politically.

9 posted on 05/27/2012 1:15:53 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“If Obama stays close to his 2008 level of support among minority voters and maintains or slightly increases their turnout, Romney has to capture about 60 percent of whites to reach a national majority. The good news for him is Republicans reached exactly that level among whites in the 2010 Congressional elections, according to the Edison Research exit poll.”

Well, this Republican will be there in 2012 to support House and Senate Conservative Republicans. However, I WILL NOT be voting for Romney or any other RINO foisted on us by the GOPe. I will leave the POTUS portion of the ballot blank. Both Obama and Romney are unacceptable to me.


10 posted on 05/27/2012 1:22:23 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“If Obama stays close to his 2008 level of support among minority voters and maintains or slightly increases their turnout, Romney has to capture about 60 percent of whites to reach a national majority. The good news for him is Republicans reached exactly that level among whites in the 2010 Congressional elections, according to the Edison Research exit poll.”

Well, this Republican will be there in 2012 to support House and Senate Conservative Republicans. However, I WILL NOT be voting for Romney or any other RINO foisted on us by the GOPe. I will leave the POTUS portion of the ballot blank. Both Obama and Romney are unacceptable to me.


11 posted on 05/27/2012 1:22:41 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; All
"If Obama can maintain majority support among those well-educated women. . . ."

One must question the "well-educated" part, if they are so uninformed about their earnings potential under four more years of a man who believes his caricature of a woman named "Julia" is the ideal for America!

Generations of women, from Abigail Adams to current business CEO's, scientists, astronauts, physicians, and leaders in every imaginable field of endeavor in America, have proven that freedom and independence from the coercive and enslaving power of government are what improve the lives of women and, in turn, their posterity.

"Well-educated" women who have read the documents of their freedom--the Declaration of Independence and Constitution--as well as the explanations of that Constitution provided in the 85 essays of THE FEDERALIST and other ideas of liberty, understand that they don't need arrogant ideologues of either sex who are in positions of power in government to make them successful.

Those who understand the sources of their liberty make up the truly "well-educated" women in America, and they will resoundingly reject the kind of snake oil sales pitches this Administration is delivering in order to get their vote.

12 posted on 05/27/2012 1:34:20 PM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
There's no economic reason to expect it to not increase. Obama got a bad situation and made it worse.

The more we talk about "Obama" and not about "Democrat policies" the more perilous our situation becomes.

Look at all the talk about Zero fading, Fast & Furious, and his eligibility. If Zero pulls out and we see the Slave Party Switcheroo at the convention, white middle class women voting Hillary! would preclude Miltie attaining anything close to that 60% total. Everything from opposition research to the ad buy would be caught flat-footed. The Democrats don't need that because they have all the media time in the world.

13 posted on 05/27/2012 1:47:41 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The RINOcrat Party is still in charge. There has never been a conservative American government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Brownstein fails to mention that Obama is “clinging” to a lead in these polls only based on oversampling Dems.

Obama performs okay in polls but when he’s on the ballot he gets smoked.

Obama is going to lose in a landslide. And they know it.

Every election, since 2009, where it has been about repudiating Obama, he goes down in flames - even in liberal places like Massachusetts (Kennedy seat) and Brooklyn, NY (Weiner seat). Never mind New Jersey, Virginia, Wisconsin (many times), 2010 landslides, West Virgina primary (Texas Inmate), Kentucky (unknown), etc.


14 posted on 05/27/2012 1:49:22 PM PDT by nhwingut (Sarah Palin 12... No One Else (Maybe Tim Thomas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

reinforce the conclusion that socially liberal, upscale white women may stand as the president’s indispensable line of defense
.........................................................
Sluts,feminists, and Dykes.


15 posted on 05/27/2012 2:13:59 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: old school; fieldmarshaldj; Jim Robinson
I honestly think that Romney will win in a landslide.

I don't think that is far fetched.

Unfortunately, Romney will think the lanslide was the result of his good looks and govern like the Massachussetts liberal that he is!

I'm not sure that you can judge Romney on the basis of his prior political behavior in Massachusetts of all places. I'm not apologizing for him, but he was just a politician from MA that did what he thought was necessary. He doesn't have a history of being a man of his convictions.

That said, if Romney tries to govern from the left, he'll generate a huge backlash from conservatives, IMHO.

The GOPe did everything possible to give him the nomination, e.g. a separate primary in NY just for the presidential primary, having open primaries in other states, etc. That doesn't mean Romney is trusted. The GOP indulged GWB's preference for big government and more debt. They were burned big time in 2006 and 2008.

The rats ran for "pay as you go" budgeting in 2006, in addition to running a bunch of prolife nominees where needed such as Bob Casey in PA and dozens of pro Second Amendment nominees for the House, but they shot their wad by electing Obama in 2008 with his hard left agenda.

The Tea Party movement just won't tolerate any RINO as usual business any more, IMHO, except in places where the hard left usually governs, e.g. Scott Brown in MA, the governator in CA, Pataki in NY, etc. Some places are hopeless, and a lot of states have very large numbers of independents, e.g. MA had over half of registered voters as independents when Scott Brown won.

P.S. NY is so bad that it's also having a separate primary to oppose Gillibrand for the Senate in late June, and another primary in September for local offices and the NY legislature in September, IIRC. NY is buried in debt, but the pols want a low turnout.

16 posted on 05/27/2012 2:24:25 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
The more we talk about "Obama" and not about "Democrat policies" the more perilous our situation becomes.

Look at all the talk about Zero fading, Fast & Furious, and his eligibility. If Zero pulls out and we see the Slave Party Switcheroo at the convention, white middle class women voting Hillary! would preclude Miltie attaining anything close to that 60% total.

Only a babe in the woods doesn't know that the environmental agenda, hostility to all forms of mined or extracted carbon energy, is the rats' agenda.

SuperPACS can expose Hillary's involvement with gunwalking to Mexico. The State Dept. sold serious military hardware to a Zetas' front in Columbus, New Mexico.

17 posted on 05/27/2012 2:41:46 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
"Obama is damaged goods and does not have a chance."

Wait and see how the whole thing turns as Panetta shows Obama how to gear up for an attack on Iran. He helped wag the dog for Clinton and knows how to work the media.

18 posted on 05/27/2012 2:57:59 PM PDT by Baynative (REMEMBER: Without America there is no free world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Don’t discount Zero’s REAL last line of defense — voter fraud on a massive scale.


19 posted on 05/27/2012 3:30:09 PM PDT by Zman516
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Only a babe in the woods doesn't know that the environmental agenda, hostility to all forms of mined or extracted carbon energy, is the rats' agenda.

Nope. It's global government. Carbon trading is merely the funding mechanism. That's about 70% of the electorate, IMO.

SuperPACS can expose Hillary's involvement with gunwalking to Mexico. The State Dept. sold serious military hardware to a Zetas' front in Columbus, New Mexico.

You think the mediots will sell time for those ads? I've got my doubts they will.

20 posted on 05/27/2012 3:41:02 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The RINOcrat Party is still in charge. There has never been a conservative American government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Zman516
Don’t discount Zero’s REAL last line of defense — voter fraud on a massive scale.

They can't cheat when it's not close. Fraudulent numbers will be too obvious. If they could get away with cheating, why did Chris Christie win in NJ, McDonnell in VA, Scott Brown in MA, Bob Turner take Weiner's seat in NY's 9th CD, let alone lose the House in 2010?

21 posted on 05/27/2012 3:56:27 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Nope. It's global government. Carbon trading is merely the funding mechanism. That's about 70% of the electorate, IMO.

Global warming foolery has ranked last on the last few Gallup polls on what the public is worried about, IIRC, and the cost of energy is on the minds of most people. Most Americans regard the United Nations as corrupt, e.g. Oil for Food in Iraq prior to the war.

Water Issues Worry Americans Most, Global Warming Least - Environmental concerns are flat since 2010, but down over past decade

You think the mediots will sell time for those ads? I've got my doubts they will.

IMHO, they'd sell their mothers for a buck. The lame stream media has watched their numbers of viewers and subscribers crash.

22 posted on 05/27/2012 4:33:03 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
White men are the largest voting block. For whatever reason, they elected Barry. Because he was revealed an inept amateur, they will unelect him. I hope(no pun intended).
23 posted on 05/27/2012 4:49:18 PM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
IMHO, they'd sell their mothers for a buck. The lame stream media has watched their numbers of viewers and subscribers crash.

Don't you wonder why their owners keep them??? I'll tell you: They maintain their ownership in managing public opinion to manipulate the value of the OTHER assets they trade, whether to devalue the price of an acquisition or to inflate the price for sale. It's name in the trade is 'pump and dump.' It is VERY profitable, particularly when selling participation to politicians increases the leverage considerably.

24 posted on 05/27/2012 4:51:05 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The RINOcrat Party is still in charge. There has never been a conservative American government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Willard didn’t govern like a Socialist because he had to, he governed like a Socialist because he WANTED to.


25 posted on 05/27/2012 5:25:45 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Owning a news service has been hugely profitable since the days when Nathan Mayer Rothschild got news of the victory of Waterloo a full day ahead of the official announcement.

Think of what a bond trader could do with that kind of information.

26 posted on 05/27/2012 5:55:55 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The RINOcrat Party is still in charge. There has never been a conservative American government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

Hillary would definitely NOT save the white house for the rats! First off all the blacks who still support Obama would go nuts, secondly the majority of registered voters are women, look around at reality, women DO NOT want to put Hillary in the white house, if they did she would be there now.


27 posted on 05/27/2012 6:09:30 PM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

“College-educated white women who are unmarried are indeed Obama’s last line of defense. He’ll win them this year, but not by the same margin he won them in 2008.”

I couldn’t imagine why this group (or many others) would go for Obama at this point; their lot, like most Americans, is worse than four years ago. The only groups I see him carrying are the unassimilated permanent dependent underclass, government workers (employed at any level in any capacity), and sexual deviants, and I can’t believe there are enough of them to outweigh “us”.


28 posted on 05/27/2012 6:37:19 PM PDT by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

He has weak support of the “working class” because many of them are now not “working”.


29 posted on 05/27/2012 6:40:48 PM PDT by packrat35 (When will we admit we are now almost a police state?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer
First off all the blacks who still support Obama would go nuts,

Not so much if he quits on his own.

secondly the majority of registered voters are women, look around at reality, women DO NOT want to put Hillary in the white house, if they did she would be there now.

Your hand-wave does not impress. IMO, there are enough who would.

30 posted on 05/27/2012 7:02:06 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The RINOcrat Party is still in charge. There has never been a conservative American government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

IMHO: The vote will go one of two ways either an Obama squeeker or a Romney landslide.


31 posted on 05/27/2012 7:37:26 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Ineptocracy; the Obama way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phlap
White men are the largest voting block.

White women are the largest voting block because they live longer.

For whatever reason, they elected Barry.

I don't have that subgroup analysis. 56 percent of Non-Hispanic whites voted for McCain.

Election Polls -- Vote by Groups, 2008

32 posted on 05/27/2012 9:13:22 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The new round of ...surveys this week generally showing President Obama clinging to a tenuous advantage ...reinforce the conclusion that socially liberal, upscale white women may stand as the president's indispensable line of defense in his struggle for reelection.

DUH! And does anyone think a SOCIALLY LIBERAL anybody is going to vote Republican?

33 posted on 05/28/2012 2:57:53 AM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

“Your hand-wave does not impress. IMO, there are enough who would.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Only an election would settle it but so far there is no evidence to support your opinion. Over the years I have asked quite a few women to tell me candidly whether they really wanted to see a woman elected president, the responses have been almost universally negative. Some paused and thought for a while but after thinking it over responded with a no. Maybe this will change with more women being elected to governorships and such but as of now I don’t see it.


34 posted on 05/28/2012 10:44:30 AM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer
My experience is the opposite of yours.

Both of my Senators and my rep are women.

35 posted on 05/28/2012 10:59:21 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The RINOcrat Party is still in charge. There has never been a conservative American government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson