Posted on 05/27/2012 12:24:27 PM PDT by neverdem
They can't cheat when it's not close. Fraudulent numbers will be too obvious. If they could get away with cheating, why did Chris Christie win in NJ, McDonnell in VA, Scott Brown in MA, Bob Turner take Weiner's seat in NY's 9th CD, let alone lose the House in 2010?
Global warming foolery has ranked last on the last few Gallup polls on what the public is worried about, IIRC, and the cost of energy is on the minds of most people. Most Americans regard the United Nations as corrupt, e.g. Oil for Food in Iraq prior to the war.
You think the mediots will sell time for those ads? I've got my doubts they will.
IMHO, they'd sell their mothers for a buck. The lame stream media has watched their numbers of viewers and subscribers crash.
Don't you wonder why their owners keep them??? I'll tell you: They maintain their ownership in managing public opinion to manipulate the value of the OTHER assets they trade, whether to devalue the price of an acquisition or to inflate the price for sale. It's name in the trade is 'pump and dump.' It is VERY profitable, particularly when selling participation to politicians increases the leverage considerably.
Willard didn’t govern like a Socialist because he had to, he governed like a Socialist because he WANTED to.
Think of what a bond trader could do with that kind of information.
Hillary would definitely NOT save the white house for the rats! First off all the blacks who still support Obama would go nuts, secondly the majority of registered voters are women, look around at reality, women DO NOT want to put Hillary in the white house, if they did she would be there now.
“College-educated white women who are unmarried are indeed Obama’s last line of defense. He’ll win them this year, but not by the same margin he won them in 2008.”
I couldn’t imagine why this group (or many others) would go for Obama at this point; their lot, like most Americans, is worse than four years ago. The only groups I see him carrying are the unassimilated permanent dependent underclass, government workers (employed at any level in any capacity), and sexual deviants, and I can’t believe there are enough of them to outweigh “us”.
He has weak support of the “working class” because many of them are now not “working”.
Not so much if he quits on his own.
secondly the majority of registered voters are women, look around at reality, women DO NOT want to put Hillary in the white house, if they did she would be there now.
Your hand-wave does not impress. IMO, there are enough who would.
IMHO: The vote will go one of two ways either an Obama squeeker or a Romney landslide.
White women are the largest voting block because they live longer.
For whatever reason, they elected Barry.
I don't have that subgroup analysis. 56 percent of Non-Hispanic whites voted for McCain.
DUH! And does anyone think a SOCIALLY LIBERAL anybody is going to vote Republican?
“Your hand-wave does not impress. IMO, there are enough who would.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Only an election would settle it but so far there is no evidence to support your opinion. Over the years I have asked quite a few women to tell me candidly whether they really wanted to see a woman elected president, the responses have been almost universally negative. Some paused and thought for a while but after thinking it over responded with a no. Maybe this will change with more women being elected to governorships and such but as of now I don’t see it.
Both of my Senators and my rep are women.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.