Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Admits He Can't Fix What Bush "Broke", So Why Reelect Him?
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | June 14, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 06/14/2012 12:13:06 PM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Anima Mundi

“Of course at that time he was assuming what would follow was a natural cyclic recovery.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

A lot of people assumed the same thing at the time, I was more inclined to believe Gerald “there is no recovery” Celente. I think there are really a number of reasons for the problem other than Obama’s obvious incompetence plus his avowed desire to destroy America. Think what shape we would be in if he were competent! He would have the destruction completed by now and would not even need to run for another term. Obama has added greatly to the problem though and to expect him to fix it is like expecting the mugger who just shot you three times and took your money to stop the bleeding and save your life.


21 posted on 06/14/2012 1:33:44 PM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bush struck the match that started the house on fire, but barry is holding the firehose that is dousing that house with gasoline.


22 posted on 06/14/2012 1:43:40 PM PDT by crosshairs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obama complains Bush didn’t know where he was headed and drove into the ditch.

But Obama doesn’t seem to know where the ditch is, or the road even after we’re in the ditch.

“...We didn’t know how bad it was” -—> how is that different from Bush? At least Obama has the advantage of hindsight, but he still has no clue.


23 posted on 06/14/2012 1:50:27 PM PDT by cookcounty ("We're all born idiots, and we only get over that condition as we get less young." -J Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The latest Obama talking point is it takes 10 years to turn an economy around.

What a f**king joke the Blame Thrower is!


24 posted on 06/14/2012 4:33:33 PM PDT by vlad335
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If bad lags (from GOP policies) are at work during Oblamo Administration, how come Clinton ‘good economy’ wasn’t caused by the good effect of George Bush 1’s previous presidency & policies?

How come Rush isn’t pointing that out?


25 posted on 06/14/2012 5:56:10 PM PDT by 4Liberty (88% of Americans are NON-UNION. We value honest, peaceful Free trade-NOT protectionist CARTELS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty

This is basically the same argument that you would have heard in 1936. After the election in 1932, Roosevelt really didn’t move the economy a single inch...other than hiring a massive number of folks onto the US gov’t payroll. The entire election of ‘36’ could be blamed on Hoover, almost in the same fashion that Bush gets blamed today. Had everyone in 1936 and 2012...worked to fix the banking situation and get them stabilized...then you would have had a fairly good step forward, but no one ever went in that direction.


26 posted on 06/15/2012 3:23:47 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson