Posted on 07/07/2012 7:28:57 AM PDT by jimbo123
More than 37.2 million people tuned in for coverage of the third night of the 2008 Republican National Convention, which featured Sarah Palins much anticipated national debut.
Wednesday nights RNC broadcasts attracted just a 1.1 million fewer viewers than Barack Obamas record-breaking speech on day four of the Democratic convention.
Coverage of day three of the GOP convention drew a large female audience (19.5 million) 5.2 million more women than tuned in for day two of the Democratic convention, when Hillary Clinton addressed the delegates, and 6.9 million more women than watched Joe Biden accept the Democrats vice presidential nomination last Wednesday night.
(Excerpt) Read more at blog.nielsen.com ...
If romney prevents palin from speaking, he prevents me from voting for him. To exclude her is sleazy sexist. BAD NEWS, MITT!!!!
“So why would Team Romney and the GOP-e want to ban Sarah Palin from speaking at the convention this year?”
RAT talking point. I would go with Allen West myself.
GOP-e says:
Jeb Bush- Si
Sarah Palin - Nyet
Because Romney doesn't want to be associated with what they consider to be "extreme right conservatism".
Sarah Palin is a threat to them just as she is a threat to the DNC.
I thought Romney was severely conservative. Is that different from extremely conservative?
You trust him to deal fairly with immigration? Spending? American values? The recession?
Bushes fooled me twice, but not three times.
Yes it is.
Severely conservative is the talking point of a multifaceted liberal liar and extremely conservative is the way of life of a hard working conservative with conviction.
Maybe Mitt will reprise his Michigan Trees speech for the convention:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHaMqHh5NZ4
Electoral or popular?
Are you taking wagers?
Sarah would steal the show- the applause would be off the charts.. she should have ran for prez
If they won’t let her speak, perhaps she could speak “off campus” at some other venue like a stadium. See who draws the biggest crowd. Maybe with Allen West. That might be fun.
Romney cannot have a VP nominee that will upstage him, nor a speaker at the convention that will be better that he is. That leaves precious few speakers left to speak or to run.
They will also not allow conservative speakers as a matter of principle, except in backwater time slots that are scheduled to conflict with other important events.
I think Romney will pick Dan Quayle...
I won’t be watching...
Romney for Obama in 2008
The Palmetto Scoop reported: "One of the first stories to hit the national airwaves was
the claim of a major internal strife between close McCain aides and the folks handling his running mate Sarah Palin."
"Im told by very good sources that this was indeed the case and that a rift had developed, but it was between Palins people and the staffers brought on from the failed presidential campaign of former Gov. Mitt Romney, not McCain aides."
"The sources said nearly 80 percent of Romneys former staff was absorbed by McCain and these individuals were responsible for what amounts to a premeditated, last-minute sabotage of Palin."
aides loyal to Romney inside the McCain campaign, said The Scoop, reportedly saw
that Palin would be a serious contender for the Republican nomination in 2012 or 2016, which made her a threat to another presidential quest by Romney.
"These staffers are now out trying to finish her off .hoping it would ingratiate themselves with Mitt Romney."
"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"
"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"
"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"
"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"
"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.