Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP IMPACT: CO2 emissions in US drop to 20-year low
The Associated Press (AP) ^ | 17 Aug 2012 | KEVIN BEGOS

Posted on 08/18/2012 5:10:50 PM PDT by newzjunkey

PITTSBURGH (AP) — In a surprising turnaround, the amount of carbon dioxide being released into the atmosphere in the U.S. has fallen dramatically to its lowest level in 20 years, and government officials say the biggest reason is that cheap and plentiful natural gas has led many power plant operators to switch from dirtier-burning coal.

Many of the world's leading climate scientists didn't see the drop coming, in large part because it happened as a result of market forces rather than direct government action against carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas that traps heat in the atmosphere.

Michael Mann, director of the Earth System Science Center at Penn State University, said the shift away from coal is reason for "cautious optimism" about potential ways to deal with climate change. He said it demonstrates that "ultimately people follow their wallets" on global warming.

"There's a very clear lesson here. What it shows is that if you make a cleaner energy source cheaper, you will displace dirtier sources," said Roger Pielke Jr., a climate expert at the University of Colorado ...

While conservation efforts, the lagging economy and greater use of renewable energy are factors in the CO2 decline, the drop-off is due mainly to low-priced natural gas, the agency said.

A frenzy of shale gas drilling in the Northeast's Marcellus Shale and in Texas, Arkansas and Louisiana has caused the wholesale price of natural gas to plummet from $7 or $8 per unit to about $3 over the past four years, making it cheaper to burn than coal for a given amount of energy produced. As a result, utilities are relying more than ever on gas-fired generating plants ...

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: climatechange; co2; energy; fracking; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; greenpower; kyoto; naturalgas; shale
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
I guess we didn't need the Kyoto treaty after all, Mr. Gore.

Of course the article still attacks the use of natural gas.

1 posted on 08/18/2012 5:11:07 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
Agreed. And then there's this:

"What it shows is that if you make a cleaner energy source cheaper, you will displace dirtier sources," said Roger Pielke Jr., a climate expert at the University of Colorado ... "

Of course the AGW phonies had nothing to do with making natural gas cheaper. And while the statement should be trueconomically, my local electricity bills -- already very high -- get higher and higher in line with Obama's promise that they would. The gas price may be cheaper to utilities but they're still screwing their customers.

2 posted on 08/18/2012 5:21:29 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx

>>true economically speaking<< that should be.


3 posted on 08/18/2012 5:23:10 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
Many of the world's leading climate scientists didn't see the drop coming

Pfffft. And these are the "brainiacs" we're supposed to trust to "save" us all from GW.....

4 posted on 08/18/2012 5:23:17 PM PDT by Libertarian444
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
Hmmm, let's see: CO2 emissions drop to a 20 year low, and we have a devastating heat-wave across the country that's decimating the corn crop. Coincidence?

And here we thought CO2 was responsible for global warming! Not possible since we're at a 20 year low and have the hottest summer on record here in Illinois!

5 posted on 08/18/2012 5:24:40 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
Michael Mann, director of the Earth System Science Center at Penn State University..

Stop right there. Isn't he the same "scientist" that was completely discredited because of some email leaks? ROFL!! Yep, one and the same!

6 posted on 08/18/2012 5:26:10 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

that Penn State is a helluva place, ain’t it?


7 posted on 08/18/2012 5:27:22 PM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa (Vote for Goode, end up with evil, pat self on back repeatedly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
‘The gas price may be cheaper to utilities but they're still screwing their customers.’

The Electric companies have billions of dollars invested in retrofitting old coal plants to Natural Gas, or in most cases closing those coal fired plants and building new gas fired plants.

Even with the massive increase in known reserves and the technology to extract it at low cost, Coal is only more expensive to use because of the burdensome and retrograde regulations of CO2 sequestration and storage requirements.

This is an EPA scam and your electric bill shows it.

All the money used to retrofit and build new gas plants to replace very efficient and inexpensive coal plants is money NOT spent on pour aging and inferior electric grid.

BTW WHY IS Mike Mann Still employed after his proved fraud.

8 posted on 08/18/2012 5:30:28 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

The sameone that thought that climate science could be explained with a “hokey stick”.


9 posted on 08/18/2012 5:30:28 PM PDT by Puckster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx

No!
“trueconomically”

I like it!


10 posted on 08/18/2012 5:31:49 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
"There's a very clear lesson here. What it shows is that if you make a cleaner energy source cheaper, you will displace dirtier sources," said Roger Pielke Jr., a climate expert at the University of Colorado ...

Yes, but before Roger goes too far, we need to clarify. This does not mean that hiking the prices on "dirty" fuels is equally good as dropping the prices on clean fuel. Artificially raising prices only causes us to be less competative in the global marketplace. Dropping prices on any fuel is good for us globally.

11 posted on 08/18/2012 5:32:30 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Gee, could it be that economic activity is at a 20 yr. low too? Related? Nah/s


12 posted on 08/18/2012 5:32:44 PM PDT by VTenigma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puckster
I never hurts to review.

Ladies and gentlemen, I present the "hockey stick explained":

Photobucket

13 posted on 08/18/2012 5:36:34 PM PDT by doc11355
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: doc11355

The happy thing history will record is that Mann is a AGW tool and not his “hockey stick”.


14 posted on 08/18/2012 5:42:24 PM PDT by Puckster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: doc11355

The evil BushCheneyRove and the eeevvviiiilll Koch Brothers musta had a lot of evil SUV’s running around at the time of the Norman Invasion.


15 posted on 08/18/2012 5:43:45 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is the operational wing of CPUSA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Obama killed the economy...so no one is producing anything and there’s no energy being consumed. That’s why CO2 emissions went down so fast.


16 posted on 08/18/2012 6:14:54 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
“Yes, but before Roger goes too far, we need to clarify. This does not mean that hiking the prices on “dirty” fuels is equally good as dropping the prices on clean fuel. Artificially raising prices only causes us to be less competative in the global marketplace. Dropping prices on any fuel is good for us globally.”

THANK YOU! You saved me from having to make the same point. Artificially hiking prices on any product introduces market distortions often leading to bad unintended consequences.

17 posted on 08/18/2012 6:20:47 PM PDT by LaserJock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LaserJock

Bush’s fault!

Might as well blame him for this also.


18 posted on 08/18/2012 6:34:04 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (ABO 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
... it happened as a result of market forces rather than direct government action against carbon dioxide

What? The free market solved the non-problem? NO WAY!

19 posted on 08/18/2012 6:46:23 PM PDT by UAConservative (Audemus Jura Nostra Defendere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Scientists think they can get real co2 measurements over a span of years AND KNOW HOW TO RELATE THEM???...They’re full of cr**.


20 posted on 08/18/2012 7:11:36 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson