Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigtigermike

These “grassroots activists” who caused this whole mess are Ron Paul supporters who lied about their allegiance in order to get delegate slots. They truly believe in a Ron Paul insurgency.

I agree that changing these rules would have long-term unintended consequences and would not be a good thing, but the original intent was to shut down an infiltration by dishonest people who are trying very hard to make trouble at the convention.


5 posted on 08/28/2012 7:39:04 AM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jedidah
...the original intent was to shut down an infiltration by dishonest people who are trying very hard to make trouble at the convention.

That does make sense. When I first heard about it I thought it was kind of snarky on Romney's part, but if Romney was really going after the Tea Party types he never would have selected Ryan.

14 posted on 08/28/2012 7:44:48 AM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Jedidah; P-Marlowe; SoConPubbie; cripplecreek; RKBA Democrat
these rules would have long-term unintended consequences

Only the naive believe they are unintended.

The first rule authorized the candidate to pick his own delegates, the 2nd enabled the candidate to set all the rules in secret with the power brokers, and the 3rd enabled the candidate to prevent future challenges.

Now, you tell me what rules 2 and 3 have to do with Ron Paul?

17 posted on 08/28/2012 7:49:35 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Jedidah

exactly , well said


19 posted on 08/28/2012 7:51:17 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Jedidah
I agree that changing these rules would have long-term unintended consequences and would not be a good thing, but the original intent was to shut down an infiltration by dishonest people who are trying very hard to make trouble at the convention.

Unfortunately this is the precursor for tyranny, which is worse.

35 posted on 08/28/2012 8:04:07 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Jedidah
These “grassroots activists” who caused this whole mess are Ron Paul supporters who lied about their allegiance in order to get delegate slots.

Damn straight. If there was ever a reason to vote against Ron Paul it's his dishonest, petulant supporters.


44 posted on 08/28/2012 8:19:28 AM PDT by Cinnamontea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Jedidah

You are lying about the lying. Liar.


45 posted on 08/28/2012 8:20:02 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Jedidah

No, it’s not just the Ron Paul people. This is traditional grassroots as well.


62 posted on 08/28/2012 8:38:47 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Jedidah
These “grassroots activists” who caused this whole mess are Ron Paul supporters who lied about their allegiance in order to get delegate slots. They truly believe in a Ron Paul insurgency.

I agree that changing these rules would have long-term unintended consequences and would not be a good thing, but the original intent was to shut down an infiltration by dishonest people who are trying very hard to make trouble at the convention.


Doesn't matter who it's directed at. Just like obama, we do not need anyone have more power over us to take our voice away. I was suppose to be a delegate, but dropped out because Romney won. Look at all he has done already to prove his liberalism. Not 100% pro-life like he said, not 100% for traditional marriage like he said, and is not severely conservative like he said. Why take away the power of the voters and give it to someone who lied and can't be trusted? We are conservatives and not liberals who walk blindly lock step behind their leader.

64 posted on 08/28/2012 8:39:25 AM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Jedidah

The Ron Paul maneuvers are the GOP-E Trojan Horse to banish all opposition. This is so much bigger than the hassle of dealing with 186 Paul delegates in a sea of Romney convention delegates.

What a ruse, that this hatchet to kill a fly approach is being swallowed whole.

The Establishment has been itching to use something to retail to the galactically naieve in order to silence the entire conservative wing of the party. This has fallen in their lap.


86 posted on 08/28/2012 9:18:25 AM PDT by RitaOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Jedidah

“Trouble at the convention” should be the name of the game! The candidates and the RNC should ALWAYS have a healthy respect for and fear of what delegates may do at the convention.

5Over the years, the convention has turned into an orchestrated event to confirm the party’s man instead of an event for delegates elected by the states/people to negotiate agreement and elect a candidate.


95 posted on 08/28/2012 9:30:19 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Jedidah; Bigtigermike

It sounds to me, like a candidate’s campaign ought to be able to vet any delegate elected under their name. Seems like that should be done before they go on the ballot though.

I think letting rules changes be done outside of the conventions is dangerous and gives too much power to the GOP-e.


178 posted on 08/28/2012 10:50:07 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Jedidah
These “grassroots activists” who caused this whole mess are Ron Paul supporters who lied about their allegiance in order to get delegate slots.

Absolutely correct. Paul is a lunatic snake-oil salesman with a lot of deluded and/or dishonest Paul-bots.

The silver lining, however, is that his duplicitous behavior has ripped the scab off the festering GOP-e sore, revealed Willard's true colors for all to see, and may, MAY (hopefully) finally light the (short) fuse on a new TRULY CONSERVATIVE third (no, make that SECOND) party for 2016. (IF we survive the Romney-Obama kabuki show.)

Sorry for the mixed metaphors ;)

211 posted on 08/28/2012 12:13:15 PM PDT by LaybackLenny (Principles aren't worth a bucket of warm spit. I'm voting Romney. God help me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson