Skip to comments.Obama ex-advisers want to put $2.8T health care industry on a budget (RATIONING!)
Posted on 09/02/2012 4:43:49 PM PDT by Innovative
Some of President Barack Obama's former advisers are proposing major changes aimed at controlling health care costs as political uncertainty hovers over his health law.
Call it Health Care Overhaul, Version 2.0. Their biggest idea is a first-ever budget for the nation's $2.8-trillion health care system, through negotiated limits on public and private spending in each state.
It could become the Democratic counterpoint to private market strategies favored by Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney and running mate Paul Ryan.
Under the proposal, the major public and private players in each state would negotiate payment rates with service providers such as hospitals. The idea is to get away from paying for each individual test and procedure. Negotiated rates could be based on an entire course of treatment.
"Politically, it is really tone deaf," said economist Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum, a free-market think tank. "There is no way Americans are going to trust any government entity to say how much the nation should spend on (health care). It is at odds with our values and our history and has zero chance of happening."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
This IS rationing!
You better get out and vote for Romney to keep Obama from getting a second term.
Think -- the life you save may be your own!
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
They just passed this in Massachusetts
you have to alert the MA government if you change any price or service.
PRICE CONTROL AND RATIONING
Here is how Obamacare works by design:
1. Force religious hospitals to sell to secular holding companies because they can’t meet the abortion mandate.
2. Secular holding companies get takeover by the state because they go bankrupt, so the FedGov will own the hospitals.
3. FedGov rations care.
We need to start by getting both the House and Senate into Republican hands and electing Romney.
Anything less will allow Obamacare to blossom into full blown government takeover of healthcare with the rationing and lack of care that will come with it. It reminds me of an old StarTrak episode, where everyone, who reached the age 60 had to walk into a “disintegrator” to be killed, so they won’t become “burdens on the society”.
No argument here.
However I think a CA might be the ticket to specifically remove certain “takings” off the table. Since certain Supreme Court justices are incapable of understanding it in more abstract form.
“I’m sorry, your treatment is too expensive and you’ll have to do without it”
How long before they cut out dialysis?
About 300,000 on hemodialysis, paid for mostly by taxpayers at about $72,000+ a pop annually - not including the meds and stuff....
That is a lot of money!! More than $21 billion from my quick calculation, not including the meds and stuff. That has got to be tempting for the tyrants since many of them can’t really work spending 12 hours a week hooked to a machine and sick the rest of the time.
It's going to take much more than that. Unless the Republican majority in the House becomes greater than 350 seats and the Senate seats number more than 67, assuming these members agree, then no Amendments to the Constitution can be voted out of Congress to be ratified by the Several States, of which it takes at least 38 to ratify.
We are off to a decent start but we have a long way to go.
Insurance schemes pulled into the claws of government are going to suffer like this.
You don’t need a Constitutional amendment to repeal Obamacare.
All you need is a willing President and a majority in both houses of Congress — a tall order, but doable.
The Dems uses reconciliation, which requires a simple majority, to pass the bill by designating it as budgetary legislation. It can be undone the same way.
Could we cut expenses by having fewer tests? Of course, but let’s put a muzzle on malpractice lawyers first.
Ezekiel Emanuel, brother of the mayor of Chicago, and once a practicing physician has long advocated that those finite health care dollars be spent only on “productive citizens”. This means Dem voters.
The Feds want the states to be the rationing proxies. The states will make hospitals their rationing proxies. Providers will work for hospitals
as rationing proxies.
The goal will be to provide as little care as possible. Doctor and provider shortages will ensure limited access which will help reduce costs. Of course, some doctors will retire and others will transition to all cash practices further reducing supply and access.
Hitler Rants about Obamacare and Right Wingers
The Constitution already prohibits such things.
healthcare budgeting ... meaning you wont get everything you need/want and your care is decided on by others
in other words....
who could’ve seen this coming??
Sarah Palin was right, ‘death panels’ are a coming!
Romney got coerced into signing mandated health care in Massachusetts by a Democrat legislator. He could have vetoed it and got overridden, but instead he chose to negotiate and put his name to the bill. You need more than Romney and Republican control of the House. You need boots on the streets demanding to get government out of health-care. You need a growing Tea Party to scare the Rinos into compliance. Just voting and hoping won't cut it.
about 1/2 the 72k a yr or like 3-4k a month for the 13 to 14 treatments per month
Budget? He can’t even get the fiscal budget passed.
Lest us not forget, our current system has either the government or the insurance companies making decisions about our healthcare and tacking on huge costs.
I don’t want either insurance or government. I favor migrating to a system that removes the need for a middleman. Middlemen only increase costs and distort need while generating billions in unnecessary treatments. Our medical system is costing too much and not getting the results.
The end result should be if someone needs treatment and doesn’t have the money then borrow it, or have your kids pay or take out a mortgage. Soon we’d find the $50K hospital costs reduced to $10K or less. Let the market decide and we’d soon see huge reduced costs in healthcare and it would not come from rationing. In the 60s a patient could actually borrow and pay the costs of hospitalization with a modest loan.
No longer would drug companies waste billions on advertising for drugs people can’t afford. But that would upset those who profit in the media. You would not have millionaire lobbyists like Billy Tauzin trying to scam taxpayers for his industry.
The system has become so distorted by excess money and the fraud of insurance that those without it can’t afford to pay. This ends up distorting the free market for providers and customers and encourages employers to move their jobs offshore. We’ve lost good jobs because of the costs and market distortion.
Change of price and *service*? Please tell me more? The system in Mass has always interested me. Was this something Patrick came up with?
It's easy--"The people of Massachusetts wanted this program, and the states are the rightful place for experiments of this sort, useful as a laboratory for the rest of the country to watch and learn. But, to reiterate--the people wanted it, voted for it. I didn't force it upon them in the dark Christmas midnight over the screaming howls of protest like Obamacare, but in the light of day. It was part of the democratic process, for good or ill."
“the people wanted it, voted for it. I didn’t force it upon them in the dark Christmas midnight over the screaming howls of protest like Obamacare, but in the light of day”
In truth, he pushed for it, but what he pushed for and what he got were 2 very different things. http://www.forbes.com/sites/aroy/2012/04/12/how-deval-patrick-gutted-romneycares-market-oriented-reforms
3. FedGov rations care for the peasants. The politicians, their owners the Banksters, and the enforcers for the politicians & Banksters will get as much care as they want.
Same goes for $10 a gallon gasoline. :-)
The best doctors and hospital systems will set up offshore facilities (Caribbean - short flight from US) for those Americans who want quality care, quickly, and can pay out of pocket.
It will become a big economic boost for the countries that incentivize this.
AMEN! I bought catastrophic health care insurance for our 28 year old son, about a year ago. Monthly premiums $66. $4500 deductible. He hasn’t used it a single time. He doesn’t need Full Coverage. Even as it is, catastrophic only, he has to pay to cover OB/GYN visits on his insurance policy and he is a single MAN! But it had to cover for that stuff. CRAZY!
A top-down budget for health care? What could go wrong?
Why not go ahead and develop a Health Care 5 Year Plan?
Ohio passed an amendment to the Ohio Constitution - the Health care freedom amendment (66% of Ohio voters approved this amendment). This was a major effort over 2 years to collect signatures and get it on the ballot.
Health Care Freedom Amendment
From the article below:
Maurice Thompson, director of the 1851 Center for Constitutional Law, wrote the state constitutional amendment that generally prohibits government from forcing Ohioans to participate in a health-care system or imposing related penalties on them if they dont. It was added to Ohios Bill of Rights.
but since the SCOTUS ruling, it is considered to be SYMBOLIC
DeWine: Decision trumps Ohio law (Freedom Amendment)
then we need a federal constitutional amendment then even Roberts can understand!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.