Posted on 09/05/2012 1:51:30 AM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome
In a June 8, 2012 contribution to American Thinker entitled "Did Bill Clinton Deliver a Coded Warning About Obama," this writer showed that there are very good reasons for believing that none other than Mr. Clinton (aka "Big Dog") slyly fingered Obama as both a Communist and a grave threat to what remains of capitalism.
The article also said that powerful Clintonian forces were crystallizing, and that Mr. Obama was going to pay the price for displaying the pomposity, unbridled narcissism, and grandiosity of a political tyro who has had enormous power hand-delivered to his lap.
Obviously, many things have transpired since June. Mr. Clinton himself largely turned invisible, went under, and remained submerged until August, when a much-ballyhooed (by the MSM) ad popped up (discussed momentarily) ostensibly supporting the man known as Obama and featuring a refreshed-looking 42nd president.
Can you believe that on September 3, two days before Mr. Clinton's signature DNC speech, news emerged that Douglas Band, a young (39) and top aide to Mr. Clinton, will be voting for Mr. Romney?
I mean, how uproariously funny is all of this? What a bracing insult to the Empty Chair!
Put that together with the fact, mentioned above, that Mr. Clinton has refused to render unto Caesar the contents of his (Mr. Clinton's) DNC speech, and what we have in the Obama camp is buckets of cold sweat and a sense that it's too late to avoid the trapdoor.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Of course, nobody can be sure, but perhaps we can trace the lineaments. Above all, Mr. Clinton is a transnational progressive who goes lighter on the fascism than Obama. He is therefore sure to send signals on an economic front that he knows more -- much more -- about the global economy than Obama does.
His speech will be a little "green," but older (including more traditional) and wiser than Obama.
He's using all kinds of inside information, of course, so he might drop a technical detail or two about Obama/Davis' national security shortcomings."
Astute readers and those who follow these things will note the funny thing in the above.
Not sure which list this would go to, Nully. Maybe both.
Deacon will NOT hear the rapist speak.
Same here, but you'd at least be interested in hearing about whatever fallout accrues from anything he might say to the DNC audience that turns out to be, for whatever reason, highly detrimental in confounding ways to the reelection chances of Teh Won, I would think.
I'll be watching for the reaction, though not willing to stomach actually hearing the speech.
Clinton is in ads now for O. So I don’t find the article very believable.
I liken it to lifting the lid on the trash container by the street to make sure the garbage man came by. ;-)
Is it possible that Willie C is looking for Ob to pick Hillary Rodham for VP?
Only if Billy KNOWS that The Won has an incurable disease.
Is it possible that Ob is too dumb to know about Arkancide?
I agreed with the analysis of the “endorsement” commercial. The commercial was ambiguous at best.
He had his LAW LICENSE TAKEN AWAY FOR YEARS!!! He LIED TO THE GRAND JURY!!
And he's the BEST they have!!! LOL....pathetic.
The IMPEACHED President won’t do anything crazy, Hillary is going to be running in 2016 or she isn’t.....she can’t go any soomer unless Obama chooses her for VP at some time.....and THAT may happen.
How do you “build” a middle class by making employers and investors the declared enemies of goverment policy?
for mah' wife and the NEXT PRESIDENT OF THESE UNITED STATES.....
HILLARY CLINTON!!!!!!
Sorry Barak i guess I went off script a litle."
The one Clinton ad I heard was him saying Obama will rebuild America from the ground up. I think Clinton knows normal Americans do not want Obama to “rebuild America”. I think Clinton knows exactly what he is doing and he has no intention of helping Obama. Just my two cents.
Correct. And he himself is, by virtue of keeping the content of his speech even from Team Obama, producing "buckets of cold sweat" for the "incumbent."
The premise of the article is that Slick is still quite popular with large segments of the Democrat party and Independents (no, I won't go into their psyche/IQ issues, as that would warrant an article/post in itself), and the possibility of verbal sabotage is not only a titillating subject, it's very much inside the Schrödinger's Cat event horizon, in terms of probability, given what we know of rancor between the Clinton and Obama/Davis camps.
Slick Willie is a MASTER at sticking the knife into the empty chair bag carrier’s back all the while trying to appear innocent.
WHY?
Because Hillary intends to run in 2016, & winning would be much more difficult against an incumbent Romney.
The Clintons know that Obama & Co. have botched any recovery & are utter failures at anything economic. They also know Romney, along with a Pub controlled Congress & Senate, is likely to do much better. If Romney succeeds in improving employment & the economy over 4 years, if things are “looking up” for people, then he is a shoe-in for reelection in 2016, probably destroying HRC’s Presidential aspirations for good.
To the charges that she was part of the Obama team that has so damaged the economy & society, she can rightly say she was mostly out of the country & played no part in Obama economic & social policy. If, as she says, she is leaving State next year, she will be 4 years removed from another failed Obama term.
This is a far better position politically than facing an incumbent Romney in 2016.
It will be interesting if barry gets reselected and Bill ends up spending a lot of time in the WH advising him....
except in that scenario, I think Valerie Jarrett would have to go as part of the deal
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.