Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Human Events ^ | 9/10/2012 | John Hayward

Posted on 09/10/2012 5:34:24 PM PDT by neverdem

The intellectual bankruptcy of vote-fraud defenders knows no bounds. They have absolutely no rational argument against common-sense voter ID laws, so they’re forced to concoct increasingly tortured, emotional arguments, in which the notion of asking a voter to show the same kind of ID for voting that he routinely presents for the purchase of alcoholic beverages is magnified, through the magic of shrill hysteria, into an act of brutal Klan-style racism.

A very long-winded example of this nonsense ran in the New York Times last Friday, penned by David Blight. Blight thinks we have to put up with unlimited voter fraud because Frederick Douglass changed his name over 170 years ago.

No, seriously, that’s his “argument.” Douglass was born into slavery as Frederick Bailey in 1818; in 1840 and 1841, he had to pay a $1.50 tax to register to vote, after changing his name. “By the mid-1840s, he had emerged as one of the greatest orators and writers in American history,” Blight tells us. “But legally, Douglass began his public life by committing what today we would consider voter fraud, using an assumed name.”

Sure, that’s exactly the same thing as Mississippi NAACP official Lessadolla Sowers getting five years in prison for pumping out fraudulent absentee ballots. Why, she’s just like Frederick Douglass! I don’t know why black voters put up with this kind of nauseating insult to both their historical pride and intelligence. Can the opponents of voter identification produce any arguments grounded in the current century? Usually it’s always 1965 to them, but now they’ve got to set the Wayback Machine to the 1840s in order to make their case?

After a few hundred more words of Frederick Douglass trivia that has absolutely no relevance whatsoever to contemporary discussions of rational voter identification techniques, Blight gets around to his jaw-droppingly stupid and insulting conclusion:

Today’s Republican Party seems deeply concerned with rooting out voter fraud of the kind Douglass practiced. So, with Douglass’s story as background, I have a modest proposal for it. In the 23 states where Republicans have either enacted voter-ID laws or shortened early voting hours in urban districts, and consistent with their current reigning ideology, they should adopt a simpler strategy of voter suppression.

To those potentially millions of young, elderly, brown and black registered voters who, despite no evidence of voter fraud, they now insist must obtain government ID, why not merely offer money? Pay them not to vote. Give each a check for $711 in honor of Frederick Douglass. Buy their “freedom,” and the election. Call it the “Frederick Douglass Voter Voucher.”

Give people a choice: take the money and just not vote, or travel miles without easy transportation to obtain a driver’s license they do not need. It’s their “liberty”; let them decide how best to use it. Perhaps they will forget their history as much as the Republican Party seems to wish the nation would.

Reality check, since Blight seems uninterested in it: not a single state in the Union requires a driver’s license as the sole form of acceptable ID for voting. In addition to various other forms of identification, all of them offer free ID cards, which require no more “miles without easy transportation” to obtain than voting itself does. Or is asking people to haul themselves to the polls on Election Day also an act of “suppression?”

Who’s David Blight? Oh, he’s just a professor of history at Yale. People are paying a fortune to subject their children to this crackpot ideology. Out here in the real world, no American of any color with a shred of self-respect thinks the great causes of justice and equality before the law are furthered by indulging ballot theft.

TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: voterfraud; voterid

1 posted on 09/10/2012 5:34:31 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Prof. Blight, eh? Some people just have appropriate names.

2 posted on 09/10/2012 6:11:38 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

I live in WiscOnsin where we have 75,000 illegals residing in the state. I want someone to tell me how we prevent them from voting in our election and changing the course of events in our state and our country. Where do I go for that protection if we don’t have voter ID.

3 posted on 09/10/2012 6:50:18 PM PDT by irish guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thank you for posting this. Thank you to John Hayward for writing it.

Is it just me, or is our side getting better at mocking the stupidity of the left? We’ve always had a few good writers like Mark Steyn and Iowahawk, but there seem to be more and more and they seem to be getting better all the time.

Or maybe the left is just getting stupider and easier to ridicule.

4 posted on 09/10/2012 6:59:50 PM PDT by generally (Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Bottom vote must not be worth much to the GOP if they won’t even defend it.

5 posted on 09/10/2012 7:57:47 PM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Liberals/Marxists/Democrats just do not understand that when the vote is scammed, THEIR vote is scammed, as well.

They also do not suspect that THEY will most certainly want a free and fair vote at some point in the future, however once it's gone...


6 posted on 09/10/2012 9:07:07 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: generally

“Or maybe the left is just getting stupider and easier to ridicule.”

Well, it’s as certain as the sunrise they ain’t agittin no smarter. I often wonder how much of their own BS they actually believe, I find it hard to imagine that anyone who really thinks that way would be able to walk and talk.

7 posted on 09/11/2012 4:47:25 AM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I wonder if it ever occurred to this nimrod that Frederick Douglass had to change his name because he was a runaway slave. Had the State of New York discovered his true identity, they would have been legally obligated to return him to his owner under the law at the time.

And, by the way, Frederick Douglass was a Republican!

8 posted on 09/11/2012 6:41:57 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks neverdem.

Partisan Media Shills ping.

9 posted on 09/15/2012 11:41:29 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson