Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here Comes Incest, Just as Predicted
Townhall ^ | 9-11-12 | Michael Brown

Posted on 09/19/2012 6:33:04 PM PDT by ReformationFan

If all human beings should have the right to marry (or simply be with) the one they love, as proponents of same-sex marriage constantly tell us, then why shouldn’t adult, incestuous couples enjoy that same “right”? Hollywood director Nick Cassavetes is the latest to say, “Why not?”, and I for one am not in the least bit surprised.

Simply stated, with the public endorsement of same-sex relationships, the endorsement (or at least acceptance) of consensual, adult, incestuous relationships is the next step. Consider the following:

· Already in April, 2007, Time Magazine featured a major article entitled, “Should Incest Be Legal?” The article noted that critics of the Supreme Court’s Lawrence v. Texas ruling in 2003, which struck down Texas’ anti-sodomy law, argued that the ruling would lead to attempts to legalize same-sex marriage and polygamy. “It turns out,” Time noted, “that the critics were right,” adding that plaintiffs were now “using Lawrence to challenge laws against incest.”

· In December 2010, when Columbia University professor David Epstein was charged with one count of incest because of his three-year, consensual affair with his adult daughter, his attorney Matthew Galuzzo remarked, “It’s ok for homosexuals to do whatever they want in their own home. How is this so different? We have to figure out why some behavior is tolerated and some is not.”

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brown; consensualincent; hollyweirdvalues; homosexualagenda; ifitfeelsgooddohim; incest; michaelbrown; moralabsolutes; sexpositiveagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: ThePatriotsFlag

The lowering of the age of consent is predictable; our society is headed downhill in a hurry.


41 posted on 09/19/2012 10:50:07 PM PDT by Loud Mime (I'll claim I speak for God only after I do acid, a few lines of coke and half a bottle of bourbon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mears
The much maligned fifties were terrific IMHO.

Yes they were, and sadly will never be again.

42 posted on 09/19/2012 11:06:14 PM PDT by itsahoot (I'll write in Palin in 2012. That is 1 vote for Palin, 0 votes for Romney and Zer0 votes for Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

As it was in the days of Noah.


43 posted on 09/19/2012 11:11:30 PM PDT by itsahoot (I'll write in Palin in 2012. That is 1 vote for Palin, 0 votes for Romney and Zer0 votes for Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Individual Rights in NJ
I always say, two places I want to live:

1950’s American (height of human civilization)


As long as you weren't black and living in the South where the Democrats were doing everything they could to hold blacks down or brainwash them.

Victorian England (height of human civilization at that point)

As long as you weren't poor.

There's always got to be conditions to these stuff.
44 posted on 09/19/2012 11:25:49 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife
I mean....they say it should be legal for rape and INCEST - as if incest is a bad thing.

They mean rape by a father, brother, cousin, or uncle. Consensual incest is okay in their book. But in the instance of rape/rape doesn't sound convincing enough so "rape or incest".

45 posted on 09/20/2012 12:04:01 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Obama likes to claim credit for getting Osama. Why hasn't he tried Khalid Sheikh Mohammed yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: al baby; fieldmarshaldj; GOPsterinMA

My cousin is getting married, maybe I should bump off her groom and take his place? ;p

Only in America!

And 12th Century Arabia.


46 posted on 09/20/2012 12:46:08 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan
it is/was inevitable once we had the push to legalize "g marriage"

Even in pederast Greece or other societies where hsxlity was the norm, almost expected, there was no question of this being legalized as a marriage.

marriage was between a man and a woman. Full stop

The ancient gaylords knew that hsxl "unions" are just flings, continuous flings, not something of permanence like a marriage (even semi-permanence like amongst the Roman elite)

We have devalued marriage with easy divorce, acceptance of multiple divorce, acceptance, in fact the norm is to shack up before marriage etc.

G Marriage was the next logical move and then this

47 posted on 09/20/2012 1:03:31 AM PDT by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Polygamy is the least of the problems. Even the Patriarchs were polygamous.


48 posted on 09/20/2012 1:30:43 AM PDT by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan
like in ancient sparta where kids were taken away from Moms at the age of 6 and the boys were to live communally (and take older men as lovers) until 30 when they could get married.

No love in a Spartan marriage either -- the men would prefer to b***** boys.

49 posted on 09/20/2012 2:00:02 AM PDT by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: onedoug; a fool in paradise
I think the Quaran specifically says a man cannot marry or have sxual relationships with his mother/step-mother/mother-in-law/aunt/sister/niece/daughter/step-daughter/daughter-in-law

Though Mohammed did marry his step-daughter-in-law....

50 posted on 09/20/2012 2:02:20 AM PDT by Cronos (**Marriage is about commitment, cohabitation is about convenience.**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

ohhhhhh.....you are good!


51 posted on 09/20/2012 4:17:40 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Using one of the lies used to defend the perversion of homosexuality, it happens in nature.


52 posted on 09/20/2012 7:01:36 AM PDT by DMG2FUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flash Bazbeaux

53 posted on 09/20/2012 9:07:18 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Depends... is she hot ?


54 posted on 09/20/2012 1:09:36 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Mears
The much maligned fifties were terrific IMHO.

Even though a lot of wrong was done even in the 50's, at least people KNEW it was wrong.

55 posted on 09/20/2012 3:09:18 PM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Oedipus killed his father and married his mother. So who payed for the wedding?


56 posted on 10/26/2013 4:38:20 PM PDT by jmacusa (I don't think so, but I doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson