Help End The Obama Era In 2012
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Posted on 10/12/2012 2:22:59 AM PDT by Mozilla
MSNBC’s Chris Matthews confronted a woman outside Centre College in Danville, Ky., the location of Thursday’s vice presidential debate, who yelled out that President Obama is a “communist” while he was interviewing people about the presidential race.
“Who said communist down here?” Matthews asked, locating the woman and asking her why she believes Obama is in fact a communist.
“All you have to do is study it out. Just study it out. And you’ll see. You haven’t done your homework, buddy,” the woman told Matthews.
“And what do I need to study?” he replied.
“He’s a communist,” she said again. “And those of us who are not voting for him know it.”
“And what do you mean by ‘communist’?” asked Matthews.
“You don’t know?” the woman asked, looking genuinely surprised.
“No, just tell me. Help me out here,” the host said.
“You don’t know?” she repeated.
“I just want to know what you mean,” Matthews added, clearly amused by the woman’s ranting.
“Oh, I know what I mean.”
“Well, help us out. You’re on national television,” Matthews went on.
Assuming the woman may be a “birther” as well, the host asked her whether she thought the president was an “American.”
“On, no…Just because he was born here doesn’t mean he thinks like us,” she explained.
“He’s a communist, buddy,” she said one more time, prompting a mix of boos and cheers from the crowd — mostly boos.
Needless to say, the woman didn’t even come close to making any kind of reasonable argument to back up her claim that Obama is actually a communist.
“You’re on national television here.”
Translation:
“I’m going to use the full force of the national media to try to humiliate and intimidate anyone who tries to call us what we are.”
“Needless to say, the woman didn’t even come close to making any kind of reasonable argument to back up her claim that Obama is actually a communist.”
Why did “The Blaze” throw that bit of state-run media bias into the article?
I’ve called him “Obammie the Commie” since 2008, blaze. Let me know if you want any kind of reasonable argument explaining why.
The evidence is so blatant, I wish they’d asked me. Read Karl Marx Communist Manifesto, the check list for it, is obviously siting on Owebama’s desk.
1) nationalization of private industry, Bank of America, General Motors—Owebama appointees run them
2) confiscation of personal and private property, $350 billion worth of properties bought off the banks and put in control of the nationalized Bank of America (Owebama’s first idea-—rent them back to the public).
3) control of the food supply, the many of those toxic assets were farms, look how controlling USDA has gotten, even to the point of controlling kids menu’s in schools (does anybody remember Hitler’s favorite Oxtail and cabbage soup that was all that was on the grocer’s shelves?)
4) separate the people from their faith
5) nationalization of health care
6) class warfare
7) abolition of inheritance rights (look at Owebama’s stance on that—he wants to take the biggest share of it)
And on top of that, he wants to throw islamofascism right on top of it, which is basically the same thing with a barbarianism thrown on top.
The two beasts of Revelation: corrupt government and corrupt religion. What government is more corrupt than communism? What religion is more corrupt than Islam? In the end, the two work together to serve the dragon, Satan.
The goals of communism and Islamism end up being the same.
Islam says is is opposed to homosexuality but from everything I’ve heard by people who lived among them, homosexual acts are rampant. Probably because everything is a sex object - including women, children, men, and animals. The reason to execute gays is to control other people. Same reason as Michelle Obama has to tell us how much salt we can have on our tofu. It’s a control issue.
And the same thing with reproduction. When Muslims want to abort a child they simply trump up some fake charges and stone to death its mother - thus killing both mother and child. They use their living children as human shields to hide behind. So even amongst themselves they are not really pro-life.
But in that time period before Muslims have the ability to execute infidels through sharia, why would a Muslim want to end abortion - the infidels voluntarily slaughtering their children? That slaughter is what will ultimately enable Muslims to take over the electoral process and lawfully turn every democratic country into a sharia state. They would be fools to fight abortion while they are working to overtake countries, since abortion is slow, systematic death to the demographic groups that could balance out the Muslims.
Everything Obama has ever done serves the purposes of both communism and Islamism. He is the union of the two towers, the two beasts which both serve the dragon.
And why is Dear Reader's "mentor" (according to multiple sources) Frank Marshall Davis, a card-carrying Party member???
And don't even get me started on Bill Ayers.
Nah ... only stupid people would think Obozo was a communist, right Chrissy? /s
close, but wrong word MARXIST is the one I’d use
Billy Graham to endorse Mitt & Ryan
How ridiculous to say Romney is a Mormom.
I mean, just because his parents, his grandparents, his mentors, his friends, his education, his sponsors, and his church were/are all Mormon, it’s ridiculous to make the charge that he’s a “Mormon”... Come on, who are you, McCarthy?
hehehehehe....
Well done!
I’ve put this in front of leftist/democrats before and asked them to show the difference between it and democrat policies.
The more creative of them say that those are good ideas, it’s just that the communists didn’t implement them correctly, and the democrats will.
obama is a halfrican, communist, mooselimb, fag bottom, druggy, PRICK.
In the modern vernacular, Communist = euro social democrat
ping for later
Technically, I would call him a “socialist internationalist communist”. The Socialist International is an organization of national political parties around the world, whose rather ominous logo is a rose clenched in a fist.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_International
The American Democrat party is a de facto member of the SI, but it is terrified of being recognized as such, as even they know that socialism is anathema in America, so must be concealed at all cost, and created in America through gradualism, guile, stealth and deceit.
Importantly, there are many Republican leaders that also embrace *some* of its ideas, if not membership, and they and the Democrats conceal this affiliation by calling themselves “internationalist”, “free trade”, and similar labels.
The SI should never be underestimated either for its determination, cunning or ruthlessness in advancing its agenda. They are such determined believers that they are incapable of recognizing when their schemes fall flat because they are inherently awful ideas.
So what are their hallmarks?
1) Internationalism before nationalism. They see nations as arbitrary creations of no inherent value, that are inherently bad because they create conflict to advance nationalist goals.
2) Equality is superior to any kind of individualism. Thus they reject ethnicity, language, culture, and both individual success and failure, in favor a gray mediocrity or even sub-mediocrity, which is easier to achieve.
In practice this is somewhat like the philosophy of a sheep herd. All members look identical. There is no initiative or action other than as the group as a whole. It is better that the herd all run off a cliff, than an individual sheep leads them to safety.
In human terms this was well described in the old, intensely socialist Sweden, where the very best career was said to be a poor, bad artist, as the government would do anything, pay you a fortune, so that you would no longer be bad, but mediocre. Yet if you sold a single painting, you would be completely cut off and ignored.
3) The factions of SI. Environmentalism, anti-militarism, multiculturalism, social engineering through ‘education’, etc.
Importantly, full nationalization has fallen out of favor among many socialists, who now prefer the national socialist economics model of “public-private partnerships” (like General Motors, or the crony capitalists in the green industries sponsored by the administration.) This was because with full nationalization, a lot of hard work is involved, but “ppp” is much easier.
As far as Obama goes, while his version of SI indeed has communist leanings, it is of the African, anti-colonialist playbook. In short, he sees America as a colonial power who can only be redeemed by reducing its international stature to the level of a “second world country”.
Do they hate him? Yes, they sure do.
Do they have a use for him? Yes, they sure do.
1. He sets rules of engagement to endanger our men, and give them the upper hand
2. He removes our ambassador’s defense team
3. He helps them overturn vile but stable leaders causing regional chaos
4. He cuts our military
5. He advances the Islamic cause in the U. S. with his policies
These and other ways, this guy does things they very much have a use for.
That’s an interesting take. You may be right. I haven’t heard that before, but I can’t say you’re wrong either.
I think his sympathy for Muslims is more in line with the general sympathy liberals have for the Palestinians. In any conflict they support whichever side is poorer and browner, whether they’re right or wrong.
I have an old tagline that says: “Islam is a violent and tyrannical political ideology and has nothing to do with a religion.”
I believe I’ve seen it. At any rate, I’m in agreement with it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.