Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/18/2012 9:09:29 AM PDT by massmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: massmike

*sigh*

Not this shit again...


2 posted on 10/18/2012 9:11:12 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

Excellent. I don’t mind this getting wrapped into the campaign. Not at all.


3 posted on 10/18/2012 9:11:48 AM PDT by Obadiah (The corrupt MSM is the enemy of the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

Amazing how those people who wrote the Constitution had no idea what it required.


4 posted on 10/18/2012 9:11:54 AM PDT by Defiant (If there are infinite parallel universes, why Lord, am I living in the one with Obama as President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike
So 9 million years of evolution is not good enough for the Second Circuit?

Well, back to the trees, and line up them females in heat, eh ~ gotta' start this over.

5 posted on 10/18/2012 9:11:57 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

OMG, speechless.


6 posted on 10/18/2012 9:11:57 AM PDT by knak (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

God created Adam & Eve, not Adam and Steve.


7 posted on 10/18/2012 9:12:54 AM PDT by DonkeyBonker (Clinging to my guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike
Our black robed overlords have found yet a new "right" in the Constitution.

No doubt this is what John Adams had in mind.

8 posted on 10/18/2012 9:13:09 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike
"[W]e conclude that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act violates equal protection and is therefore unconstitutional," they wrote.

It's obvious that the "intellects" on the Second Circuit have neither knowledge of the Constitution or biology. This is an outrage to "We the People".

9 posted on 10/18/2012 9:14:41 AM PDT by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike
Ewww! I didn't know the link was to some repulsive gay site.
10 posted on 10/18/2012 9:14:45 AM PDT by KittenClaws (You may have to fight a battle more than once in order to win it." - Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

The Second Circuit Court.


12 posted on 10/18/2012 9:15:51 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

I have a (liberal) lawyer friend whose favorite expression is that we’re a nation of laws, not men. But that is BS given the phenomenon of judges continually deciding that laws which were constitutional are now (magically) not constitutional anymore.


13 posted on 10/18/2012 9:16:21 AM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike
The Democrat pond scum who keep complaining over the measly $1.5 million Congress has spent in defending DOMA have no one to blame but themselves. If Leftist would quit attacking DOMA, ZERO dollars would be needed to defend it. Now, even more will be spent defending it, thanks to the barbarians.
14 posted on 10/18/2012 9:17:14 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike
Are you kidding me? Well, if we are going to redefine marriage, then I think we should redefine family as well. I think pets should be considered "Family". Think about it. To not call a pet a member of a family is a crime and unconstitutional. Plus I can always use an extra one or two dependents. ;-)
21 posted on 10/18/2012 9:22:10 AM PDT by drinktheobamakoolaid (How do you replace an empty suit? Vote on November 6, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

47% of Americans do not pay taxes. I pay mine. Is that equal?

Friggin libral Judges.

Don’t anyone try to feed me this horse dung about 1% being homosexual. It just aint so,no 1% could change the morals and traditions of 3,000 years.


23 posted on 10/18/2012 9:23:58 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

This is the kind of bovine excrement I’d expect out of the Ninth Circus, not the Second!


24 posted on 10/18/2012 9:25:03 AM PDT by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike
The Chik-fil-A army stands ready and waiting to go to the polls.
29 posted on 10/18/2012 9:27:48 AM PDT by mojito (Zero, our Nero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

The legacy we leave behind for our children, grandchildren and this great nation is crucial. As I approach my 94th birthday, I realize this election could be my last. I believe it is vitally important that we cast our ballots for candidates who base their decisions on biblical principles and support the nation of Israel. I urge you to vote for those who protect the sanctity of life and support the biblical definition of marriage between a man and a woman. Vote for biblical values this November 6, and pray with me that America will remain one nation under God.

Billy Graham
Montreat, NC

http://www.billygraham.org/vote-biblical-values/index.asp?QR=168&BA=2740&SOURCE=BY12ABVVG&gclid=CJWG0p79irMCFayPPAodl0cAvQ

Amen!!


32 posted on 10/18/2012 9:30:50 AM PDT by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike
Just a matter of time before the Warren Roberts Court comes to the same decision.
34 posted on 10/18/2012 9:33:34 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike; wagglebee

I know that it doesn’t violate equal protection, because I know that the Founders would never have intended this.

However, short of an amendment to the constitution, the truth will only be shown after the culture suffers the depths of depravity to which this will take us.

IOW, sadly, the only textual argument that can be made by our side is a convoluted one. It must go to either states’ rights or to a willingness to hear an original intent from silence argument.

The DOMA needs to be made non-reviewable, the Constitution needs to change, and short of that this will not be overturned with John Roberts and Anthony Kennedy on the bench.


36 posted on 10/18/2012 9:35:56 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: massmike

” and found a federal definition of marriage as one man and one woman violates the U.S. Constitution.”

So anyone can marry any number of anything?

Stupid judges.


37 posted on 10/18/2012 9:35:59 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson