Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Candy Crowley's bosses must be prosecuted - they knew about the collusion
Logic | 19 October 2012 | Mene Mene Tekel Upharsin

Posted on 10/19/2012 5:26:12 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Think. Candy Crowley and Obama colluded in the debate. It's obvious. How would Obama know to tell her to "Get the transcript!" unless they had planned a response ahead of time on the Benghazi issue? Then, Crowley enabled Obama's lie about the topic and cut Romney off. The next set of questions that must be asked must deal with the supervisors who knew that the collusion took place prior to the debate.

Candy Crowley did not have the authority to use her firm's equipment to video conference with the Obama camp about debate topics/answers (had to have video conferenced to try and cover -- couldn't be anywhere near each other physically, obviously). Candy Crowley did NOT unilaterally decide to collude with the Obama camp. People at all levels of Crowley's firm had to know this was taking place including the technicians who made it happen. Those individuals must be prosecuted for illegally trying to skew the governing process of this country. This is treason.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: candygate; cnn; collusion; crowley; enemyofamerica; libyacoverup; mediamalpractice; obama; presidentlies; propaganda; rewritinghistory; security; tinfoil; transcriptgate; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
Treason. The very media that might even look into this is itself corrupt.
1 posted on 10/19/2012 5:26:17 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin; Lazamataz

Nothing will be provable. What we all saw was quite bad enough.


2 posted on 10/19/2012 5:31:18 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

3 posted on 10/19/2012 5:32:26 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

No prosecution necessary. It all worked to Romney’s benefit. The eversion of the intended effect is sufficient punishment, I think.


4 posted on 10/19/2012 5:32:39 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE www.fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

The left is evil. I watch day after day as their minions keep defending them. They will say anything.

I was happy to see the Republican ad come out with the timeline - proving clearly that this corrupt administration was deliberatley steering the American public for the sake of the election.

Someone has to answer as to why Crowldy happened to have that transcript, and how Obama knew to ask her to refer to it. Unbelievable corruption.


5 posted on 10/19/2012 5:36:35 AM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

While I tend to do as little business as possible with companies that advertise on media outlets that insult me, I’m only one guy. I think it’s time to advance the theme that: “If you can’t trust the network, you can’t trust their advertisers.” This takes the fight directly to the pocketbook of both entities.


6 posted on 10/19/2012 5:36:40 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Re-distribute my work ethic, not my wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
True. Nothing is likely to be provable. The closest we can get will be hard numbers on interruptions, time spoken, who got to close a segment, etc.

Still: there is a consensus among both RINO and conservative pundits that Candy Boo Boo Child behaved UTTERLY out of control. This will ensure Candy will not be served at a R&R White House, and it SHOULD cause our side to start asserting itself with regards to moderator selection.

SHOULD. We have seen fumbles before.

7 posted on 10/19/2012 5:39:01 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

“Congress shall make no law....abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...”

The MSM is free to tell all the lies they want.

Jackass Romney agreed to the format, and if he didn’t know that sabotage could be expected, he’s too stupid to be president.


8 posted on 10/19/2012 5:39:34 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Sorry, I blame the stupid Republican party for agreeing on the moderator and the format. Why would anyone be surprised at this??


9 posted on 10/19/2012 5:40:09 AM PDT by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
The very media that might even look into this is itself corrupt.

True, to a point: We own vast segments of the new media. We are gradually increasing in power and influence.

10 posted on 10/19/2012 5:41:19 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

I agree arm bears, a national boycott against all advertisers would cut the purse strings. This is the only thing that is going to stop the networks.


11 posted on 10/19/2012 5:41:38 AM PDT by JT Hatter (Who is Barack Obama? And What is He Really Up To?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

When he asked her to say it again louder, it was comletely unPresidential. It was petulant, immature, petty, pathetic, childish, smug and dangerous. He is so thin skinned and is so vengeful, he doesn’t need to have the code for our nuclear weapons.


12 posted on 10/19/2012 5:41:58 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

“Congress shall make no law....abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...”

The MSM is free to tell all the lies they want.


BUMP. And we are free to bring to light, ridicule, and regard the MSM for what it is: a speaking mechanism for liberal talking points, no longer (if ever) mainstream.


13 posted on 10/19/2012 5:44:21 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (Candy Crowley: The MSMs' very own Agatha Trunchbull.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Not enough people are talking about the other section of the debate which indicated collusion --

Mitt Romney finally brought up the very ugly topic of Fast & Furious. Obama wasted no time at all -- "Candy?" he said -- and Candy Crowley very dutifully jumped in and changed the topic. Almost like they had pre-arranged that strategy.

14 posted on 10/19/2012 5:45:06 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Global Warming is a religion, and I don't want to be taxed to pay for a faith that is not mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

CNN threw away their last bit of credibility, and for what?

Romney saw the trap coming, and wriggled free. All this whining about how Romney did not prosecute the attack is just people upset because he declined to stick his head in the noose.

When it’s two against one, and you don’t know what the deal is, you back off. It’s simple math. Romney backed off, because he could sense the hammer, but could not see from which direction the blow was going to fall.

That’s because Romney is smarter than Obama, Crowley and Michelle all put together.

Now this failed ambush will keep the Benghazi story alive through Election Day, and demonstrate to the voters how Obama and his MFM enablers are lying cheats. This is a disaster for Obama and the MFM.

Couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch...


15 posted on 10/19/2012 5:45:55 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (If Hillary reminds every man of his ex-wife, Joe Biden reminds every woman of her ex-husband.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

You owe me a jug of Brain Bleach.


16 posted on 10/19/2012 5:48:20 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

CNN has a multi-million dollar appeal languishing in Obama’s stacked NLRB (NLRB Case 05-CA-031828).
An administrative-law judge (an Obama donor) ruled against CNN in 2009 .
CNN’s appeal has since set before the 4 member NLRB board: 3 of them Obama appointees.

It seems awfully convenient that Obama has had this hanging over CNN’s head his whole tenure.
Can’t help but wonder if it was why Crowley was even more partisan than I expected.


17 posted on 10/19/2012 5:48:26 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice

‘completely’. Mistyped and missed the ‘p’.


18 posted on 10/19/2012 5:49:07 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Wow, she says she’s a vegetarian. Only potatoes?


19 posted on 10/19/2012 5:52:58 AM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Yer pic...........”milk through the nose” funny!!!


20 posted on 10/19/2012 5:55:37 AM PDT by wesagain (The God (Elohim) of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is the One True GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson