Skip to comments.Benghazigate: We Know Now Who Gave the Order Not to Protect the Consulate
Posted on 10/26/2012 11:03:03 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Charles Woods, the father of Tyrone Woods, said in an interview, And apparently even the State Department had a live stream and was aware of their calls for help. This was my son, he wasnt even there. He was at a safe house about a mile away. He got the distress call. He heard them crying for help. Thats why he and Glenn risked their lives to go that extra mile just to take care of the situation. And Im sure that she wasnt the only one that received that distress call: Come save our lives.
When I heard that theres a very good chance that the White House as well as other members of the military knew what was going on, and obviously someone had to say, Dont go rescue them. Because every person in the military, their first response is, Were going to go rescue them. We need to find out who it was that gave that command.
So who gave that command?
>>>Fox News has learned from sources who were on the ground in Benghazi that three urgent requests from the CIA annex for military back-up during the attack on the U.S. Consulate and subsequent attack nearly seven hours later were denied by officials in the CIA chain of command who also told the CIA operators to stand down rather than help the ambassadors team when shots were heard at approximately 9:40 p.m. in Benghazi on Sept. 11.
Former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were part of a small team who were at the CIA annex about a mile from the U.S. Consulate where Ambassador Chris Stevens and his team came under attack. When they heard the shots fired, they radioed to inform their higher-ups to tell them what they were hearing. They were told to stand down, according to sources familiar with the exchange. An hour later, they called again to headquarters and were again told to stand down.
Woods, Doherty and at least two others ignored those orders and made their way to the Consulate which at that point was on fire. Shots were exchanged. The quick reaction force from the CIA annex evacuated those who remained at the Consulate and Sean Smith, who had been killed in the initial attack. They could not find the ambassador and returned to the CIA annex at about midnight.
At that point, they called again for military support and help because they were taking fire at the CIA safe house, or annex. The request was denied. There were no communications problems at the annex, according those present at the compound. The team was in constant radio contact with their headquarters. In fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Specter gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. Fox News has also learned that two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait, among them Delta Force operators.<<<
Now we know who is taking responsibility for denying support to the consulate and the safe house.
The photo, which is the official one put out by DOD, from the press conference held by Panetta and General Dempsey is horribly eloquent in terms of body language.
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta defended the failure to go in by claiming that the issue was a lack of reliable intel, despite the fact that they had multiple distress calls and a drone overhead.
Blaming a lack of reliable intel is fine if you want to pull away from intervening in Syria, but not when a US diplomatic facility and its personnel are under sustained attack. And how much intel was really needed to send two jets to buzz the area and possibly scare off some of the attackers, who would not have posed any threat to the aircraft?
>>>Although forces were on alert and ready to launch an operation if needed, the US military commander for Africa, General Carter Ham, the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, and Panetta all decided against any intervention as they had no clear picture of events unfolding in Benghazi, he said.<<<
So the buck has been passed to Panetta and Dempsey and Ham. Dempsey is a soulless administration toady and Ham is deeply invested in Libya. Panetta is a Clintonite who is completely expendable, especially if the charges get pinned to Hillary. But Panetta still seems filled with self-loathing and Dempsey looks disgusted with him.
Not doing something because there is no intel is a common excuse in these circles when they dont want to do something. Just as with Iran, there would never have been enough intel.
And how much intel was needed really? Benghazi had an extended profile and was the cause of the entire Libyan war. The consulate had an extensive intelligence apparatus and the declassified cables weve seen are a fraction of the actual classified cables that would have been at Panetta, Dempsey and Hams disposal.
They knew about the Islamist militias and had descriptions of their armament from the RSOs reports. They didnt know the exact number of attackers or every single possible detail, but you can never really know everything before going in.
>>> Theres a basic principle here, and the basic principle is that you dont deploy forces into harms way without knowing whats going on, without having some real-time information about whats taking place, Panetta told a news conference.<<<
But there were already forces in harms way, who were trying to provide some real time intel from their point of view. What Panetta means is that the decision was made not to send aid to them, and it wasnt about risking more lives, but about the politics of intervening in Libya and offending the Libyans. It was done for the same reason that US soldiers have at times been abandoned without air support in Afghanistan.
I feel confident that our forces were alert and responsive to what was a very fluid situation, General Dempsey said, which is one of those strange statements that leaders issue after a complete screw up.
The full transcript of the conference was fairly well hidden on the site, but turned up here, it shows the full exchanges.
>>>Q: Can I follow up on that? One of the reasons weve heard that there wasnt a more robust response right away is that there wasnt a clear intelligence picture over Benghazi, to give you the idea of where to put what forces.
But when there was, in fact, a drone over the CIA annex and there were intelligence officials fighting inside the annex, I guess the big question is, with those two combined assets, why there wasnt a clear intelligence picture that would have given you what you needed to make some moves, for instance, flying, you know, F-16s over the area to disperse fighters or or dropping more special forces in.
SEC. PANETTA: You know, let me let me speak to that, because Im sure theres going to be theres a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking going on here.
We we quickly responded, as General Dempsey said, in terms of deploying forces to the region. We had FAST platoons in the region. We had ships that we had deployed off of Libya. And we were prepared to respond to any contingency and certainly had forces in place to do that.
But but the basic principle here basic principle is that you dont deploy forces into harms way without knowing whats going on; without having some real-time information about whats taking place. And as a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, General Ham, General Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation.
Q: So the drone, then, and the forces inside the annex werent giving enough of a clear picture is what youre saying.
SEC. PANETTA: This this happened within a few hours and it was really over before, you know, we had the opportunity to really know what was happening.<<<
And the alphabets will lead with...........And Billy Jo McAllister jumped off the Tallahassee Bridge
"......Smith said that Ambassador Susan Rice told her it was related to the anti-Islamic film. She recalled, Leon Panetta took his hands with my face and said trust me, I will tell you the truth. I will get the right information to you, just trust me. And when I heard that, I knew I couldnt trust him, and I dont trust any of them anymore.........
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Simply put, Panetta is a liar.
Obama, Clinton and HE left the Ambassador
and the others “behind” to be raped and murdered.
THEY STOPPED THE RETRIEVAL for al Qaeda and the
other agencies that control their treason against the USA.
I started yesterday with WSJ’s page 1 weeper piece on Benghazi’s damage to Hillary’s “reputation.”
These parents need to get together and let the world know what is going on and how they’ve been treated.
This confirms my initial reaction:
Obama pounded the table and declared:
We will NOT inject American forces into another mid-East country and create the impression were involved in a civil war!
From there, the team set about inventing excuses.
Denied 3 times.
So now God sends the Frankenstorm to give a message to Obambi.
I can’t remember what interview it was where Leon Panetta laughed when he couldn’t recall how many places around the world Americans were putting their lives on the line.
I know Sean Hannity covered it.
Panetta maybe gave the order but I can’ believe he didn’t get it from a level or two above him.
May God give the families of the dead peace, because they sure as heck are not going to get anything except lies out of this bunch.
NOTHING in the mainstream media about this courageous father.
Clearly, Panetta’s anus is puckering big time!
no wonder obama was pushing ... early voting!
Wasn’t General Dempsey the one who called Pastor Terry Jones to ask him to denounce the muhammed video a day or two AFTER the attack?
This is on Obama. He is the CIC.
Happened at the DNC convention, too, IIRC.