Skip to comments.Doctor disputes common acceptance of ‘brain death’
Posted on 11/22/2012 8:17:35 PM PST by Coleus
Organ transplants are big business and patients are often declared “brain dead” in order to harvest their organs, neonatologist Dr. Paul A. Bryne said during a talk last Sunday at the Knights of Columbus hall. The event was sponsored by the St. John the Baptist Pro-Life League of Saint Benedict Center in Still River. Dr. Byrne, past president of the Catholic Medical Association (USA), has directed the neonatology and pediatrics departments at Charles Mercy Hospital in Oregon, Ohio. He is president of Life Guardian Foundation, a pro-life organization based in Vancouver, Washington.
He has appeared on television’s “Good Morning America” and “Cross-Fire,” opposite Dr. Jack Kevorkian, a promoter of physician-assisted suicide. The BBC interviewed him for a segment titled, “Are the Donors Really Dead?”
“Organ donation is a multi-billion dollar industry,” Dr. Byrne stated. “It’s larger than the abortion industry.” “Every organ that’s transplanted is a healthy one and every organ that is transplanted comes from a living person,” he said, adding that these are taken out of bodies with a “beating heart and circulation.”
“Every donor is killed in the process,” he stated. Although the medical profession declares patients “brain dead,” often following an accident, Dr. Byrne insisted there’s no such thing. “Brain death was false,” he said. “Brain death was a lie from the beginning. It has always been a lie.”
“Brain death is not true death,” he continued. “Organ transplant is the reason you have to have brain death.” Dr. Byrne said this term crept into the medical profession following the world’s first heart transplant in 1968. It has since been defined and redefined and is now being replaced by another term known as cardiac death, he noted.
He said donated organs, without exception, must come from a living person. Within minutes of “true death,” which, he explained, is the cessation of circulation and respiration, the organs will begin to die. This is why, when organs are removed from a donor, the beating heart is always taken last. “You cannot get any organs from cadavers,” he noted. “If you’re really dead, then no organs can be extracted.”
He also pointed out the differences between living and dead patients. One example is cooling the body. This slows metabolism in someone who is alive. It slows destruction in a corpse.
He said a ventilator, which pushes air into the body, can only be used on someone who’s living, as the person exhales the air. Also, if you cut the skin of someone who’s living, but declared “brain dead,” the wound will heal, something that won’t happen in a dead person. “Clearly there’s a difference,” said Dr. Byrne.
Dr. Bryne went on to describe the damage that can result when doctors perform an “apnea test,” which often sets the stage for organ donation. This is when a ventilator is removed, prematurely, for 10 minutes, to see if a person can breathe on their own. This process, which he called “suffocation,” typically results in the person’s conditioning worsening, he said.
‘No’ apnea test, he said. Recovery after being declared “brain dead” is also possible. Dr. Byrne showed a widely televised clip of Zach Dunlap, who was close to having his organs removed, following an accident in an all-terrain vehicle. As a nurse was removing his life support, Mr. Dunlap’s cousin, also a nurse, did his own reflex test by scraping a sharp knife against the bottom of Mr. Dunlap’s foot. When he showed “purposeful movement” in response, the organ harvesting was canceled. He said there are now 175 known long-term survivors of “brain death.”
The audience was warned against registering as an organ donor at the Registry of Motor Vehicles. He advised people to carry a card, or a notarized document, stating they do not wish to donate their organs. The criteria of “brain death” remains a controversial one, even within the Vatican, according to Catholic News Service reports. The Pontifical Academy of Sciences has agreed that medically defined brain death means the person is no longer living, but, in 2005, shortly before he died, Pope John Paul II asked to reopen the debate. He has been widely quoted as saying, “vital organs which occur singly in the body can be removed only after death, that is from the body of someone who is certainly dead.”
In 2006, Pope Benedict XVI requested a conference in which 20 medical authorities presented clinical evidence on brain death. The forum was not open to reporters. Dr. Byrne’s organization, in 2009, held a “Signs of Life” conference in Rome, attended by Cardinal Sergio Sebastiani and Cardinal Francis Arinze.
-— Organ transplant is the reason you have to have brain death. -—
I heard Jimmy Akin mention this on Catholic Answers a few months back. I had to ask myself if I trusted a medical community that maims (vasectomy, Botox, sex change) and kills patients (abortion, euthanasia), as a matter of policy.
Brain death is not true death, he continued.
So nobody ever dies. Ever.
I will never sign a donor card. It upsets my wife every time I tell someone that I want to be kept alive by any effort necessary no matter what Doctors may say about my condition.
I refuse to believe that some hyper-educated person professing to be certain of the full essence and spirit of the human mind and heart, can truly comprehend anything from looking at some trace on an oscilloscope.
You need to look a little harder at the definition of ‘brain death’. Sure, people die.
I have no particular knowledge of the brain but I know it controls all the main body functions. Since these people keep breathing, have their blood circulate, then the brain can’t be totally dead.
I once visited a funeral home in Norfolk, VA. We were just talking and I asked if he had ever had a body come back to life. He sort of nonchalantly told me they had one last week.
They called an ambulance and the guy did die for good a few days later. That kind of thing does make one think.
you have an unusual fear of the inevitable!!
I once heard that permanent heartbeat cessation is the universal cause of death.
No fear. I just don't want to miss anything down here. I love life and don't want any snuff doctor to bamboozle it from me before I decide to give up the ghost.
This is important, please read it. I can’t recall if we’ve discussed this in the past.
Herein lies the problem. Is the question of how one defines death a theological problem or a scientific one?
From a theological (or perhaps more appropriately spiritual-anthropological) viewpoint, the moment of death is when the soul leaves the body. However, this moment is not readily visible from our standpoint.
According to Dr. Byrnes statement, no person whose circulation or respiration was being artificially supported would be dead.
Everything that has been described to determine when someone has died is a "test". And no test has perfect sensitivity or specificity. So to argue, as he does, that the tests are imperfect adds nothing to the discussion. Of course, they are imperfect, all tests are.
There is a great good to be achieved in transplantation for those with failing organs and those who donate perform a great act of charity. To argue that transplantation should never be done because the tests for death are imperfect is an untenable argument.
In the real world situation, the decision to be made is which patients who are being artificially supported have no chance of any further recovery. The brain death criteria were developed for this reason.
Inevitably, when you hear these stories about people recovering from "brain death", the problem has not been the brain death criteria but failure to perform all the tests that establish the criteria properly. Do NOT assume that if an article reports someone to have been brain dead, that properly performed tests resulted in that determination.
Finally, for Catholics, it should be noted that the Vatican accepts properly performed tests for brain death as determinative of death. It's not that the Vatican lays claim to a supernatural understanding of when some one dies. Rather, it is a humble statement of acceptance of the state of the art. In other words, the Church defines death as the moment when the soul departs the body but relies on medicine situated in the real world to determine the proper tests for that. The corollary to this position is that, if science advances to more clearly define a better test, then that test will be considered in brain death's stead.
We need to get this information out to as many as possible, including possibly a letter to the editor.
If any of our loved ones are declared brain dead, at the very least, we should get our own neurologist.
Thanks for the ping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.