Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A third President Bush? No thanks. The Oval Office is no place for nepotism
Sacramento Bee ^ | Nov 24 2012 | Foon Rhee

Posted on 11/24/2012 8:28:27 PM PST by WilliamIII

As Barack Obama and many others never tire of telling us, part of the American Dream is that anyone can grow up to be president.

That's not exactly true, of course. It takes smarts and charisma, ambition and ego, money and key allies, and quite a bit of luck to get anywhere close to the White House.

Still, we're not supposed to have political royalty in our democracy, born of a revolution against the British king.

So it made me cringe to see the story on the front page of Friday's New York Times, also published in The Bee, about supporters already talking up Jeb Bush as a potential presidential contender in 2016. That would be the former Florida governor who is the son of George H.W. Bush, our 41st president, and brother of George W. Bush, our 43rd.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

1 posted on 11/24/2012 8:28:29 PM PST by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Let the votes of the republic decide. I couldn’t care less if it was relatives of the same family or not. I care what they stand for. For me the first two Bushes were problematic, big-government types. For THAT reason, I wouldn’t want to see another.


2 posted on 11/24/2012 8:35:21 PM PST by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII
OK, forget the NAME for a second. Jeb Bush was very popular as governor of Florida, even with the Spanish speaking population. He's married to a Hispanic woman. He was very effective and successful and more articulate than his older brother. In fact GHW Bush thought that Jeb would make a better POTUS than GW.

His son, George P. is photogenic and thinking about political office.

I'd vote for him.

3 posted on 11/24/2012 8:35:21 PM PST by boop ("I need another Cutty Sark"-LBJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaNew

These same people who claim to oppose nepotism, if some cases push Hillary Clinton for president. Hillary’s only qualification is being married to Bill. For that, we are supposed to make her president, but we’re never supposed to consider any other political family relatives???

And what about the numerous Kennedys who have been in political office? Because they are liberal, that’s okay???


4 posted on 11/24/2012 8:40:20 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego ('s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

It isn’t? What about the First Ladies offices, expenses and salaries?


5 posted on 11/24/2012 8:43:08 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Foon Rhee? That first name didn’t accidentally substitute the letter “n” for “l” by any chance . . . ?


6 posted on 11/24/2012 8:44:14 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

looks like this post has drawn the BushBots out tonight


7 posted on 11/24/2012 8:45:58 PM PST by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

looks like this post has drawn the BushBots out tonight


8 posted on 11/24/2012 8:45:58 PM PST by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

looks like this post has drawn the BushBots out tonight


9 posted on 11/24/2012 8:46:03 PM PST by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

you ought to read the article all the way through. he goes on to oppose Hillary too


10 posted on 11/24/2012 8:47:26 PM PST by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

I don’t care anymore.
I am so sick and tired of being sick and tired.

Whatever.....


11 posted on 11/24/2012 8:48:47 PM PST by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

I posted the Newsmax article about the possibility of Jeb Bush in 2016 and got 99 percent responses rejecting the notion. Guess when a liberal attacks the democratic process and falsely calls it monarchical dynasties, the perspective alters somewhat.


12 posted on 11/24/2012 8:50:05 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PapaNew

I care what they stand for. For me the first two Bushes were problematic, big-government types. For THAT reason, I wouldn’t want to see another.
___________________________________________________________

Yep! And for that very reason......I WILL NOT vote for another Bush. They are poison. If that is what is planned for the next election......count me out.


13 posted on 11/24/2012 8:52:56 PM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Great vid by ShorelineMike! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOZjJk6nbD4&feature=plcp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: boop

If Mitt can get the grudging votes of most Freepers, Jeb Bush would be a cake walk.

The Schiavo scandal, however, bids fair to attack Jeb from both sides. Those who felt he went too far, and those who felt he did not go far enough. This could make his base suffer badly.


14 posted on 11/24/2012 8:55:37 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Foon is a fool and needs to look up in the dictionary the word ‘nepotism’. No, we won’t go into Bushes any more, but if elected it wouldn’t be a case of nepotism.


15 posted on 11/24/2012 8:58:47 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Am I a bush bot for saying this viewpoint is fundamentally wrong? If the people vote for another Bush.. Clinton or whomever its in their power to do so. The author obviously forgets about the Adams and Roosevelt etc.


16 posted on 11/24/2012 8:59:49 PM PST by aft_lizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Look for the Dems to be all in favor - if a Bush were elected they’d have someone to blame stuff on for another 20 years...


17 posted on 11/24/2012 9:02:58 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

I’m pretty sure the Kenyan piggy is in there for good. Remember 50% of the people living in this country are going to want their messiah to have a third term. It will be “historical” and those morons love making “history”.


18 posted on 11/24/2012 9:02:58 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Criminal defense lawyers won't have the Twinkie to kick around anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

There’s plenty of time to talk about this. We can hash out completely the history of the bank Grandpa Bush ran for the Nazis. During the primary battle in 2015. In excruciating detail. Every day. For a year.

In case the GOPe is so stupid they think they can cram another Bush down our throats without any fuss.


19 posted on 11/24/2012 9:05:50 PM PST by DManA ( you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Now that you mention it, it WAS Bush’s fault.


20 posted on 11/24/2012 9:06:42 PM PST by DManA ( you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson