Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 4 Benefits of Marrying Young
Pajamas Media ^ | 12/01/2012 | Paula Bolyard

Posted on 12/02/2012 7:21:17 AM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last
To: SeekAndFind

The “evangelical” church I went to in high school and college extolled these four points (mentioned in the quoted article) for “single people” (both men and women) —

– Learning to love herself and accept her self-worth
– Time to become her own person
– Benefit of knowing who she is
– Experiencing life as her own complete person

As a result, there was very little serious courtship and marriage going on within that age cohort (late teens/early to mid twenties). The “Evangelical Christian” culture of the time (many of its books were sold at our local college Bible bookstore) placed heavy emphasis on “the gift of singleness” and only very light mention, if any, on the importance of marriage and child rearing. This was the late 1970s - early 1980s.


41 posted on 12/02/2012 10:13:45 AM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In order for this to be feasible, the education system must be dismantled and children should be taught to be mature and responsible, and educated and trained well enough to be able to support themselves. Now we have people being students until they are in their thirties, and when they finally graduate, they still can’t make a living.


42 posted on 12/02/2012 10:19:05 AM PST by Pining_4_TX ( The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s tough today. There aren’t as many good people out there and there hasn’t been for 25 or 30 years. If you don’t find that person by 25 or maybe 30 it gets real tough, real fast.

I was one of the ones who tried but what I mostly ran into was crap. It’s easy to be down on yourself till I realized that for most women today in the first half of their lives, for all the talk and bluster, they wouldn’t have married most men of their grandfather’s or great-grandfathers generation, simply because they wouldn’t have considered them men, or someone worth pursuing.

Most today are self-centered financial predators looking for the best deal they can get. Their vision of what a man should be is so far from the mark that it’s not worth pursuing. There’s only so much baggage and screwed up ideas in a person that you can tolerate before you have to say ‘no deal.’ I find most potentially interesting women today downright offensive.

And seeing some of the guys today, I can’t imagine how hard it must be for the women too. All I can say is if you find the special person, latch on and don’t let go.


43 posted on 12/02/2012 10:24:39 AM PST by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! [You can vote Democrat when you're dead]...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
A man doesn't really know true happiness until he's married!! Of course, by then it's too late
44 posted on 12/02/2012 10:30:26 AM PST by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My wife has now gotten to that age where she needs to be ironed.


45 posted on 12/02/2012 10:35:13 AM PST by Patriot365
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I have had 5 children from my age of 30-49.

My feelings are it's a mixed bag. When younger you are more distracted by basically everything.

Older...more experience and hopefully more stable but the big one...you die earlier and likely have less energy

But you can make up for the energy by communicating with them to train them and enrich them how to grow up to be men or ladies and today prepare them for the inevitable politics by other means that lies ahead. I spend all my free time with my last 3 or their mommy

Myself...I would have never been faithful to women as a young man. I realized that and put it off.

But it does have a price.

For someone like me, marrying early 30s with a mid 20s gal is about perfect.

But to each his own.

My folks married at 23 and for life faithfully.

My grandparents and so forth even younger and most often stayed true.

Today is a different and in many ways worse world.

Beware.

46 posted on 12/02/2012 10:35:30 AM PST by wardaddy (wanna know how my kin felt during Reconstruction in Mississippi, you fixin to find out firsthand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

For a lot of couples (not all) “happily married” is oxymoronic


47 posted on 12/02/2012 10:35:38 AM PST by clamper1797 (I mourn for the America I grew up in ..fought for ..and loved ..July 4 1776- June 28 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This article appears to be based on the assumption that we are still living in a sane America, with the same attitudes and values that we had in the 50s or 60s, or heck, even the 80s. But we don't. We live in a society that has been getting sexual hedonism pumped into everyone's brains via Hollywood and now our public schools to the point where it would be difficult for a young man to find a woman who doesn't have 20 sexual partners by age 25. Add to that the ridiculousness of divorce and family law in this country and any man would have to be insane to get married in this toxic environment.

All you people bragging about your 40-50 year marriages, congratulations, but you got married in an America that doesn't exist anymore. Many of you are still trying to push the same standards for behavior, castigating young men for not "committing". Well, marriage in this day and age is not a commitment for a man - it is a game of Russian Roulette. Women can walk away any time for no reason, taking all the money and the kids while the state forces the ex-husband to fork over his assets at gunpoint, and those women are constantly encouraged to do so by our corrupt Lifetime/Oprah/porn culture. Women in this country are largely unmarriageable. Plenty of you will whine and cry about that statement, but it is true, and any man who fails to see that will pay the price.
48 posted on 12/02/2012 10:39:06 AM PST by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak; SeekAndFind
to the point where it would be difficult for a young man to find a woman who doesn't have 20 sexual partners by age 25.

Or to the point where it would be difficult for a young woman to find a man who hasn't had 20 sexual partners by age 25.

49 posted on 12/02/2012 10:41:53 AM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797

Societies fail if they believe in a delayed marriage. If the US falls into this trap it will go the way of Europe - lower birthrates, increased immigration, and increased Islamization.


50 posted on 12/02/2012 10:46:15 AM PST by impimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

You make some truly great points.

“My advice now is, find someone good enough as soon as possible and make it work.”

You have to hae something to work with. Personally, I’m not looking for anything that’s diseased and covered with tats and piercings; ridden hard and put away wet at a minimum.

It’s the reality we face in many cases. I pass.


51 posted on 12/02/2012 10:47:42 AM PST by GOPsterinMA (The autopsy will show that this nation committed suicide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A good post.
If we stop romanticizing a perfect life and “happy searching for your self” for years as a singleton, more people would get married. This would lower the divorce rate long term, probably boost the birth rate AND shift a lot of single people to conservative (because single women tend Democrat while married tend Republican).


52 posted on 12/02/2012 10:48:11 AM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

It’s marriage that is supposed to make you “complete”, you don’t get “complete” on your own.


53 posted on 12/02/2012 10:49:58 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: impimp


54 posted on 12/02/2012 10:52:24 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
It’s marriage that is supposed to make you “complete”, you don’t get “complete” on your own.

Right, but the church/Evangelical Christian culture was pushing the idea that you had to become "complete" on your own, before you could get married. You had to be "perfect" in order to be married. How could anyone, male or female, ever be perfect enough?

55 posted on 12/02/2012 10:59:21 AM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: thecodont
Or to the point where it would be difficult for a young woman to find a man who hasn't had 20 sexual partners by age 25.

Don't know that that's necessarily true. I used to assume that, also, but word on the street is that a lot of guys are having trouble getting female attention these days, and the problem appears to be that most of the young ladies want to go after the same guys. It' the high school model in national terms: most of the girls in school want to go after the jocks, rich guys and assorted bad boys who make up maybe 20% of the school population, and they ignore the nerds, and nice boys. This means that roughly 20% of the boys are banging most of the girls and the rest are scrounging for scraps.

It should be self-evident that, if a girl wants to have sex, she can simply snap her fingers and have ten guys ready to go, but if a boy wants to have sex, he has to get his butt in gear and be something impressive. As a result, some young men are reaching their mid to late 20s having had maybe one or two "girlfriends" at best, while even plain girls can have as many partners as they want (the only thing that may keep them in check is that they are competing with other girls for the most attractive guys - they don't give it up for just any slob, generally).

This appears to be the new reality in the modern US - we are now largely absent any morals or values, and are reverting back to animal behavior. I'm hearing a lot of grumbling out there from the young men who aren't the alpha studs that pickings are even more slim now than when the USA was sane.
56 posted on 12/02/2012 11:03:17 AM PST by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak
This means that roughly 20% of the boys are banging most of the girls and the rest are scrounging for scraps.

Or they decide maybe going gay isn't so bad, at least they get some that way.

While I am joking, but then again, there may very well be a grain of truth in that statement.

57 posted on 12/02/2012 11:07:11 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak; fieldmarshaldj; Impy; kearnyirish2

That is as clear and accurate a synopsis that can be written on this subject.

Bravo!


58 posted on 12/02/2012 11:07:41 AM PST by GOPsterinMA (The autopsy will show that this nation committed suicide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: thecodont
Or to the point where it would be difficult for a young woman to find a man who hasn't had 20 sexual partners by age 25.

Of course, guys usually tend to overstate those numbers.

59 posted on 12/02/2012 11:10:01 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Wow, the range of emotions on this topic is fascinating!
To all those who are in successful marriages, congratulations!

To the poster who made the ugly comment that women are peak at 20 and ‘downhill’ after that, wow! Just wow! Some narrow thinking there dude. Try meeting and having a heartfelt conversation with one of us ‘older and mature’ women, you might gain some much needed insight.

I can speak from experience on the topic this article address. Being young and single in the decadent 80’s was something I wouldn’t wish on my children. It was ALL about the stupid Cosmo magazine and the garbage Helen Gurly Brown was pushing and young women ate that sh** up. We were so sure that we on the cutting age of what ‘hip’ was...some were living together, postponing marriage and so convinced we could ‘have it all’.

There were no realistic guidelines to what made a successful relationship, it was all about being free and single. We were so sure our version of free love was superior to those of the 60’s. As a result, we floundered about just going with the flow of working, living on our own, or not, meeting and dating all the other lost souls of our time.

My ex and I did chose to live together before marriage, much to my parents horror! Speaking only for myself, yes, it does give you that freedom to walk away. Even then we were told of the statistics of divorce being higher of those who lived together. Sadly, it proved to be true in our case.

What I witness currently, is my children and their peers are far more interested in finding a mate earlier and enjoying a stronger marriage then some of their parents had.

Now divorced and in my ‘50’s’ it is a very strange land in regards to dating again. Sometimes frustrating yet always interesting.


60 posted on 12/02/2012 11:11:07 AM PST by AllAmericanGirl44 (Fluck this adminstration of misfits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson