Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SOCIAL SECURITY NOW CALLED 'FEDERAL BENEFIT PAYMENT'/ENTITLEMENT!
emal | 12/8/2012 | email edited by Ib Jensen

Posted on 12/08/2012 4:42:06 AM PST by IbJensen

Have you noticed, your Social Security check is now referred to as a "Federal Benefit Payment"?

The government is now referring to our Social Security checks as a “Federal Benefit Payment.”This isn’t a benefit – its earned income!

Not only did we all contribute to Social Security but our employers did too.

It totaled 15% of our income before taxes. If you averaged $30K per year over your working life, that's close to $180,000 invested in Social Security.

If you calculate the future value of your monthly investment in social security ($375/month, including both your and your employer’s contributions) at a meager 1% interest rate compounded monthly, after 40 years of working you'd have more than $1.3+ million dollars saved! This is your personal investment.

Upon retirement, if you took out only 3% per year, you'd receive $39,318 per year, or $3,277 per month.

That’s almost three times more than today’s average Social Security benefit of $1,230 per month, according to the Social Security Administration (Google it - it’s a fact).

And your retirement fund would last more than 33 years (until you're 98 if you retire at age 65)! I can only imagine how much better most average-income people could live in retirement if our government had just invested our money in low-risk interest-earning accounts.

Instead, the folks in Washington pulled off a bigger Ponzi scheme than Bernie Madoff ever did. They took our money and used it elsewhere. They “forgot” that it was OUR money they were taking. They didn’t have a referendum to ask us if we wanted to lend the money to them.

And they didn’t pay interest on the debt they assumed. And recently, they’ve told us that the money won’t support us for very much longer. But is it our fault they misused our investments?

And now, to add insult to injury, they’re calling it a “benefit,” as if we never worked to earn every penny of it. Just because they “borrowed” the money, doesn't mean that our investments were a charity! Let’s take a stand.

We have earned our right to Social Security and Medicare. Demand that our legislators bring some sense into our government –

Find a way to keep Social Security and Medicare going, for the sake of that 92% of our population who need it.

Then call it what it is: Our Earned Retirement Income.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: demorats; everthingevilindc; evilobamaregime; republicrats; socialsecurity; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-144 next last
To: varon

“By what convoluted logic do you arrive at the premise that monies earned by me and taken from me and my employer with promise to start repayment at date certain, all of a sudden becomes an entitlement just because corrupt government officials have embezzled the funds? “

You f’ed up. You trusted them. You actually thought they were saving your money for you, didn’t you?

The first law of the Ferengi comes to mind “Once you have their money, never give it back”.


121 posted on 12/08/2012 11:50:39 AM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Okay, let’s fire the unionized ones first. Bye bye, USPS.


122 posted on 12/08/2012 11:54:12 AM PST by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
I think you underestimate the cost of illegal aliens, new immigrants on the dole, and the subsidies to low wage new immigrants.

Illegals cost hundreds of billions per year.

Illegal immigration costs U.S. taxpayers about $113 billion a year NET at the federal, state and local level. Study used outdated number of 13 million illegals. In reality it is 30 - 40 million.

New low wage immigrants cost NET $20,000 per household @ 4,550,000 household in 2004 per Heritage.




123 posted on 12/08/2012 11:58:44 AM PST by khelus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows
Just a little technical explanation. The real name is Old Age Survivors and Disability Insurance(OASDI). When the Social Security receipts exceed the checks/payouts, the extra is used to invest/purchase special non negotiable Treasuries, it does not go into the general fund.

This purchase increases the Debt. It is a liability owed to the purchaser of the security. The balance is referred to as so called “Trust Fund”.

When the payouts are more than the receipts, the shortage does not come from the general fund ; The Treasuries are “cashed” which brings down the Debt.

That's why Obama’s threat to withhold Social Security checks was one of the more egregious statements he made during the debt ceiling debacle.

The confusion comes from the fact that the “Trust Fund” has been shown at various times as an off or on budget item.
During Clinton years, it helped to make the deficit look like a surplus.

It goes on and off budget depending on the prevailing politics of the period. Only when the Trust Fund balance is down to zero, will Congress have to hit the general fund, or some other fund to continue the benefits, or do nothing and let the recipients take an immediate 25% reduction in benefits.

124 posted on 12/08/2012 12:01:19 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: khelus

“I think you underestimate the cost of illegal aliens, new immigrants on the dole, and the subsidies to low wage new immigrants. “

It doesn’t matter. They just cost us more money that we don’t have. We have already decided as a country we aren’t going kick them out, so those costs will continue. They will also be shocked when their checks stop, but I suspect a good share of them are working under the table so they’ll not be completely cut off.


125 posted on 12/08/2012 12:03:39 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes

“the extra is used to invest/purchase special non negotiable Treasuries, it does not go into the general fund.”

So the money goes to purchase special Treasuries, and THAT money goes to the general fund. It’s how the government launders money. It goes to the general fund. Yes, there is a “special Treasury not” generated too, but that’s irrelevant.

“When the payouts are more than the receipts, the shortage does not come from the general fund ; The Treasuries are “cashed” which brings down the Debt.”

No it doesn’t bring down the debt. The “special treasuries” are cashed by the government issuing other treasuries (which these days are purchased by the Fed mostly)

So the whole “Special Treasuries” idea was just a tool used to spend surplus SS money money when it was receied, to be paid back by our children and grandchildren if they don’t have the good sense to default on it.

The “Special Treasuries” are simply replaced with other debt - and if we can’t borrow the money, we’ll just effectively print it (laundered through the Fed.)


126 posted on 12/08/2012 12:32:13 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes
The Treasuries are “cashed” which brings down the Debt.

My position is that borrowing is the only way to “cash” in the Trust Fund therefore adding to the debt, not bringing it down. There is no cash. The way the government gets cash is by borrowing it. Thusly, credit creates money.

Hearing you explain the mechanics of bringing down debt by "cashing" in the Trust Fund should prove enlightening. Dare you explain it?

127 posted on 12/08/2012 12:54:25 PM PST by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

No the money used to purchase the special treasuries do not go to the general fund, it goes to the Federal Reserve Bank, where it is held as a “due to” account balance-in this case, due to the USA Government.

Call it Money laundering if you wish, as Beranke contiues to print money hand over fist, but this printing means the checks will keep coming-it just may take a whole check to purchase one loaf of bread at some point.

Cashing the security does reduce the debt. The fact that the Fed sells other securities later and increases the debt again and probably to even higher levels does nothing to change that.

Consider for example, if you had 2 credit cards, and made a payment on the first one with no additional charges-that would reduce your debt on that card.

The fact that you charged money on another card in sufficient enough amount to increase your overall debt does not negate the impact on the first card, and your overall debt is still better off than if you had skipped the payment.

Like I said it’s just a technicality. However, Social Security payments can keep coming legally as long as the Trust Fund has a balance, because Bernake can just keep printing whatever money he needs for payoffs.

If he keeps going, it may take the whole check just to buy a loaf of bread, but there you have it. USA citizen taxpayers get the shaft no matter how you slice and dice it.

IIRC, the Debt owed to ourselves is around 60% including all the various programs. When the USA defaults, I expect it will be a default to the citizens, not the other countries, but we’ll see where it goes.

Last time the country faced bankruptcy J.P. Morgan bailed them out. I bet that all the rich people in the whole country couldn’t bail us out today even if they chipped in their last dime. In fact, I doubt that many woulld even consider it let alone do it.


128 posted on 12/08/2012 1:09:29 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
re:“I think you underestimate the cost of illegal aliens, new immigrants on the dole, and the subsidies to low wage new immigrants. “

It doesn’t matter. They just cost us more money that we don’t have. We have already decided as a country we aren’t going kick them out, so those costs will continue. They will also be shocked when their checks stop, but I suspect a good share of them are working under the table so they’ll not be completely cut off.


I seem not to have made by point clear enough.

I responsed to:
“First cut welfare for illegal immigrants (or insert favorite program here) before you cut MY benefit”
“Cut Congressional raises”
“Cut Federal salaries”“First cut welfare for illegal
immigrants (or insert favorite program here) before you cut MY benefit”
“Cut Congressional raises”
“Cut Federal salaries”
All of which are noble thoughts, but have negligible effect on the overall solvency of the nation and ability to pay any remaining entitlements.


My point was removing bennies from illegals and new immigrants would go a long way toward achieving solvency. And this is but one expenditure that could be cut before cutting SS or military benefits.

That being said, the corruption and lack of spine I've observed on both sides of the aisle in DC lead me to believe that the odds of enacting the options that would return us to solvency have the same chance as that old familiar snowball in Hades.
129 posted on 12/08/2012 1:17:58 PM PST by khelus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

Hey! Where’s my 1.7 % goody?

I didn’t receive a letter. Where’s my stuff. I’ve paid into this freaking scheme since I was 14 years old. I’m now 76 and have paid the maximum since I was 24; this doesn’t include what my employer has ponied up!

Speaking of ponies.

How’s Bronco Bama?


130 posted on 12/08/2012 1:19:35 PM PST by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: khelus

“I seem not to have made by point clear enough. “

I get it now. THe point I was making is that folks self-justify their entitlement by claiming there is some other entitlement that is more worthy of cutting before theirs. It’s a psychological trick used to self-delude.


131 posted on 12/08/2012 1:28:31 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
The first law of the Ferengi comes to mind “Once you have their money, never give it back”.

Ah yes, I had forgotten. Thanks for reviving my memory...........

132 posted on 12/08/2012 1:43:52 PM PST by varon (11-06-2012 dob United Socialist Ghettos of America (USGA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Got the letter yesterday, but then I had to register democrat and buy a prayer rug to be on the list. LOL.

You may get something Monday.

Best wishes.


133 posted on 12/08/2012 1:52:29 PM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

Nah, it ain’t pretty and it is a technicality. But the Fed can just the money it needs. Cash is deducted from paychecks and sent to the Governmet.

The excess receipts are required by law to purchase/invest these non-negotiable Treasury Securities. Reflected on the Federal Reserve Books in a “due to” account. Due to the USA Government as opposed to some other Government, other entity or individual.

The Treasury Dept. lets the Fed know that it is cashing in some of these securities. Just like some student’s parent may decide to cash in Government Bonds for the tuition.

When bonds are cashed that particular bond is no longer a liability owed, and is a subtraction to the Debt. There is always enough money for these transactions, because the Bernake can print money till the cows come home.

Consider for example if you had a couple of credit cards. You make a payment on the first card and no additional charges; your debt on that card goes down. If you make a payment on the second card, but charge more on the second card, the second card may or may not be reduced depending on the size of the charges. Hence your overall debt might go up even though the balance on the first card went down.

Now if you happen to approach you debt limit, sometimes the card company raises the limit and you go merrily on your way free to charge even more should you be deperate or imprudent.

Eventually, your payments exceed your ability to pay, at which point, maybe you get a raise or maybe you don’t. Maybe you file for bankruptcy.

But Uncle Ben could just say no problemo, hit the printing press and you’d have all the money you need. It will be even uglier when that printing party comes to an end.

Not a perfect example, but perhaps it illustrates the point?


134 posted on 12/08/2012 1:55:24 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes

Sorry about the typos. Seem to have left out a word too.

Insert the word print in the 2cnd sentence of the first paragraph after the word just.

deperate=desperate


135 posted on 12/08/2012 2:07:12 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: kabar

The full faith and credit of the USG, ROFL. Pixie dust and unicorns. The USG is BROKE.


136 posted on 12/08/2012 3:00:18 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
This isn’t a benefit – its earned income!

Bull sheet. It's a Ponzi scheme.

137 posted on 12/08/2012 3:01:32 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Obama should change his campaign slogan to "Yes, we am!" Sounds as stupid as his administration is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trek

(revisiting the thread after working all day to pay into the socialits/totalitarian PONZI scheme)...I agree with most posters here that yours is an OUTSTANDING post! Thanks, trek.

BTTT!


138 posted on 12/08/2012 6:15:16 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

He who expects nothing is seldom disappointed.


139 posted on 12/08/2012 6:42:00 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

As it stands today and everyday since we started getting our Socialism Security, we have to pay income tax on every damn cent!

The US Congress is a sick joke that has been incestuously reproducing itself since 1913!

Down with the fruitcake Bronco Bama and down with the corrupt US Congress and the Soopreme Kort!


140 posted on 12/09/2012 3:42:11 AM PST by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson