Posted on 12/28/2012 6:03:45 AM PST by RoosterRedux
Edited on 12/28/2012 6:05:29 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Three New Jersey police officers were reportedly wounded during a shooting inside the Gloucester Township Police station.
MyFoxPhilly.com reports that the suspected shooter has been shot and killed.
One officer was undergoing surgery early Friday, while injuries to the other officers were minor, sources told the station.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Right. I’d like to know what is the ‘mass’ number. As many as you can before being stopped?
He ended up being target practice for the cops.
Nah. Just give them all one bullet and make them keep it in their left breast pocket.
We should pass this as a National Law....Call it “Barney’s Law”
So, now, another false flag operation, intended to push the gun control envelope further?
we won’t get the straight story on this...
There’s really not enough information to make any statement like that. For all we know, this was an escape attempt, and not a mass shooting attempt.
That argument isn’t going to fly in this instance, because the shooter got his gun off one of the cops.
4 cops shot in a Detroit police station a year ago (see post 19).
1 point to be made. The Detroit shooting took place in the unsecured lobby of the police station. Secure areas where there are likely to be prisoners means officers are likely unarmed. I don’t know if this is the case in the NJ shooting but it seems to be pretty standard policy.
The suspect, while under arrest, “obtained a firearm” near a stairwell....
Hmmmmmm.... I bet there are no cameras in that area.
How does someone under arrest”obtain” a gun from the cops?
3 injured and the shooter dead.
If it had been a gun free zone the death toll would be much higher.
This story enforces the argument that guns stop crazy law beakers intent on killing much faster than a “gun free zone”
I should bloody well hope so. If not some serious questions about the police and their training are in order.
I should bloody well hope so. If not some serious questions about the police and their training are in order.
Totally changes the story! He “obtained” a firearm during the struggle... failure to secure a weapon while marching a suspect into the police station.
How are they going to spin the .223 “assault weapon” into this story? Seems like they’ve let it get too far already.
Last time, it went from being in the trunk, to being the murder weapon in just a couple hours.
A local young black male, just out of HS and waiting to be called to the military, was arrested for speeding and suspected driving a stolen vehice. He evidently saw his future going up in flames and grabbed a policeman's gun in the station, shot and killed two veteran cops and the young clerk. Just now getting to trial.
BTW one of the policemen killed was a black man, the other two white.
The perp ran but was followed and picked up. He is angry and full of hate for whitey, according to many of his statements.
Point to Feinstein and other gun grabbers--weapon used was a handgun belonging to the cops. The problem was a mentally deranged youth.
vaudine
It looks like some cops forgot safety procedures. If you are going to interrogate a suspect, either you restrain the subject or you make sure there are no arms in the interrogation room. Some people are very bad at taking responsibility for their actions and particularly don’t like someone telling them that they will be held responsible.
FBI defines it as 4 or more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.