Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/03/2013 9:34:19 AM PST by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: chessplayer

Obama is forcing Chaplains to perform gay marraiges.


2 posted on 01/03/2013 9:37:43 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer
Guy reminds me of one of those dolls with a string on the back that you pull and it says something.

You never know what you're going to get.

3 posted on 01/03/2013 9:37:48 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("More law, less justice." --Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

not surprised. After all, his political party did vote “no” three times to allowing God in their party platform.

Slippery slope, downhill VERY fast...


4 posted on 01/03/2013 9:38:20 AM PST by sassy steel magnolia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

And so it begins... Priests in the military will be forced to perform so-called “gay marriages.” So, in theory, they would also be forced to participate in Satanic rituals.


5 posted on 01/03/2013 9:39:15 AM PST by reegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Any Chaplain who serves in the military and abides by these rules, is not truly a man of God. They should ignore the rules or get out. But the question is: Would anyone really complain if a Chaplain was court martialed for saying “Jesus” or refusing to perform a gay marraige?


7 posted on 01/03/2013 9:51:14 AM PST by Terry Mross ( I post so people who hate me will know what I think. And they can't seem to stop reading. LOL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

He who pays he piper calls the tune.

If chaplains were paid by their denominations rather than the USG that would solve the problem.

But as things now stand they are government EMPLOYEES.


8 posted on 01/03/2013 9:54:57 AM PST by lightman (If the Patriarchate of the East held a state like the Vatican I would apply for political asylum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Think of the 1950’s.
Everything that was considered right in the 1950’s is wrong now.
Everything white, male, Christian, patriotic or heterosexual is inherently and irredeemably EVIL.
The more of these categories something falls under the more EVIL it is.
That’s how Obama sees America.
His point of view is that of an angry, molested, jug-eared little mixed-race boy with a bats*hit crazy commie for a mother.
And he will have his revenge!


9 posted on 01/03/2013 9:57:53 AM PST by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer
Der Fuhrer may have some use for military chaplains in the future.

Is everyone now crystal clear on where this corrupt marxist bastard is taking us?

10 posted on 01/03/2013 10:12:09 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Army Chaplain at an Obama-endorsed ceremony:

Dearly beloved:
You are gathered here, but I am forced against my will, to join these two faggots in a mockery of a Christian sacrament. What they allegedly do is a sin against God, which I do not endorse. However, they want to throw a party and my choice is to preside over this or face a court martial. So, I’ll make this short.

If anyone should object to this nonsense, besides myself, let it be known now.

Whichever one of you is the groom today, do whatever you do to whoever is playing the role of bride today.

May God have mercy on your souls.

Amen


11 posted on 01/03/2013 10:16:44 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Presidential signing statements are perhaps the most blatantly unconstitutional presidential actions, in that they usurp power from both the congress and the courts.

They are bad enough to be considered a “constitutional crisis”. And what is needed is for the SCOTUS to declare that they are invalid.

Importantly, the Marbury v. Madison (1810) decision determined, among other things, that the courts could not compel the president to act, via a “Writ of Mandamus”. However, they most certainly can compel a president to *not* act in an unconstitutional manner, if not directly, then against those subordinates that carry out his orders.


12 posted on 01/03/2013 10:30:00 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Nobody can believe this guy after he ordered HHS to oppress those religious organizations and companies, while swearing that what they were doing was not oppressive at all.

He was lying then, and he is lying now. He is only upset because he very definitely was planning to force military chaplains to violate their faith and marry homosexuals. And this messes that scheme up.

The only question now is if he will direct the Pentagon to force chaplains anyway, leading to a lawsuit. And will that lawsuit be a military lawsuit or in the civilian court system?


14 posted on 01/03/2013 10:35:52 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Wait-—wait—this guy is a Christian

A Christian who didn’t go to Service at Christmas, but flew back to Hawaii for a golf game.

Probably a million bucks or more to fly the guy back down.


15 posted on 01/03/2013 11:02:34 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Who is obama to advise anyone on their conscience, one must first have a conscience before one may make judgement. And we all no Satan has no conscience!


19 posted on 01/03/2013 2:49:07 PM PST by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson