Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans Begin Gun Cave
RushLimbaugh.com ^ | January 11, 2013 | RushLimbaugh.com

Posted on 01/13/2013 11:44:29 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Open Line Friday to Seattle we go. Peter, thank you for calling, sir. Great to have you with us.

CALLER: Great to be with you, Rush. Happy birthday to the Surgeon General of Democracy.

RUSH: Thank you very much. I appreciate that.

CALLER: They don't hate you 'cause you're on the right; they hate you because you're correct.

RUSH: Effective, yeah. That's sadly the case. Every time you see me ripped to shreds in the media, folks, understand I've just been effective, and that's why I'm being ripped. Or anybody else on the right. Same theory applies.

CALLER: Absolutely. Couldn't agree more. But I just had to put a call in and thank the voters of California for passing Proposition 30, the soak-the-rich tax amendment and helping move the Sacramento Kings to Seattle. It looks like they're going to be making 13% more on their $60 million payroll, and that would more than cover their losses last year.

RUSH: Wait, is this a done deal?

CALLER: No, it's not a done deal.

RUSH: Because there are local groups in Sacramento that want to buy that team, right?

CALLER: Right.

RUSH: They can get it for cheaper than what the Seattle group can. The Seattle group's gonna have to pay, what, $125 million more than a local group would have to pay simply for relocation fees, actual moving expenses, a number of other things. Of course, the owners of the team, the Maloofs, are aloof. Nobody knows what they're gonna do.

CALLER: Right.

RUSH: They change their minds on a dime. I guess for you guys Prop 30 is a factor, there's no question. But it also depends on how active the local Sacramento groups, how desirous they are keeping a team there.

CALLER: Very true. But I think the main thing is you talk about the moderate Republicans are going to soon be talking about guns as an issue that they need to compromise on.

RUSH: It's already happened. Some Republican from Georgia -- I'm having a mental block on his name. I don't know. I shouldn't say a name because I don't know. I don't remember. But some moderate Republican from Georgia has already made my prediction come true yesterday, that we need to "get serious" about gun control.

CALLER: Well, I think the thing they could say any time they want to say something like is say, "They've tried it already in California." California right now has an assault weapon ban. They have a ban on ten-round magazines.

RUSH: With all due respect, I've been doing this 25 years. One thing I've learned that does not win these arguments or debates with people is logic. Facts and logic don't win. Real world examples are irrelevant. Because we're dealing here with pure, unadulterated emotion. On the Republican side: Fear. The Republicans who gonna buckle on this are the same moderate Republicans...

They're largely from the Northeast, but not all, but they are largely moderate Republicans, they're the same Republicans who think that abortion is killing the party, that immigration stance is killing the party, that pro-lifers are killing the party. Now they're gonna think that this gun business is killing the party.

"We're gonna have to moderate on this. We gotta distance ourselves from the NRA because the NRA is a bunch of wild-eyed freaks and kooks and hayseeds." I made this prediction. Actually a lot of people think this is gonna be the case. Some Republican in Georgia, I think, already crossed the line. I wish I could remember who it was. Maybe I can find it during the break. But pointing out how this doesn't work is not gonna matter a hill of beans, because it's not about policy that works.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Right here it is, folks. It was Phil Gingrey, the Republican from Marietta, Georgia. He was speaking at the Smyrna area council of the Cobb Chamber of Commerce breakfast. It took place yesterday at the Smyrna Community Center. Phil Gingrey, said, "There are some problems, and maybe these huge magazines even for someone who says, 'Look, I just use an AR-15 for target practice.' But do you really need to be standing there shooting at a silhouette a shot a second or even quicker with that kind of weapon? For what purpose?" Gingrey asked. "I would be willing to listen to the possibility of the capacity of a magazine." Meaning being limited.

It was only yesterday. I did not know he said this at breakfast, so he had already said this by the time we offered the postulation yesterday afternoon, but I didn't know that. I'd heard rumblings. Erick Erickson at Red State sent a note, said, "You mark my words, the Republicans are gonna start fading on this just like they have on abortion and immigration." And, by the way, just for what it's worth, Gingrey, after saying he's open to discussion on the limits of the capacity of a magazine, went on to say that Todd Akin was partly right on what he said about rape. He'll be forgiven for that since he had the right position on magazine capacity. If Gingrey had just gone out and said, you know, Todd Akin is partly right, today he would have been taken out. But since he got it right as far as the media and the left is concerned on magazine capacity, he's reported objectively and fairly, ostensibly, in the various places he's been reporting.

END TRANSCRIPT


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; amy; banglist; guncontrol; philgingrey; rkba; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
But do you really need to be standing there shooting at a silhouette a shot a second or even quicker with that kind of weapon? For what purpose?"

Spoken like someone who has never done it. By the way what does a magazine have to do with how quickly the weapon fires? With a ten round magazine you still put 10 rounds into a silhouette in 10 seconds or less.

21 posted on 01/13/2013 12:45:59 PM PST by Starstruck (The police carry weapons for self protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Gun Rights? 2nd Amendment?

Remember those “rights” are given by God, not granted by Government. Neither Commie Dems nor RINO Pubbies can take them.

This attempt will not end well.

FUBO! FURINOS!


22 posted on 01/13/2013 12:52:11 PM PST by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

The only answer is freedom loving patriots.


23 posted on 01/13/2013 1:40:26 PM PST by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Darren McCarty

I think it’s a tad late for that, by a few decades. The amount of atrocities that have been committed by the leaders and the amount that they have gotten away with tells me that no amount of voting will fix anything. People lack the will to do what’s needed.


24 posted on 01/13/2013 1:42:14 PM PST by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

2nd Amendment bump for later.....


25 posted on 01/13/2013 2:10:02 PM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

If the Republicans cave on guns, they will go the way of the Whigs. I will vote Libertarian or Constitution party.


26 posted on 01/13/2013 2:15:01 PM PST by 3Fingas (Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

“Serious Gun Control” means tightly grouping your double-taps”

Don’t forget a steady trigger pull. :)


27 posted on 01/13/2013 2:17:09 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

NRA says gun lobby has the support in Congress to block assault weapons ban
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2977729/posts


28 posted on 01/13/2013 2:21:24 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
You are so right on that. However, no politician will lead us to the “promised land”. Our forefathers brought this country through on their knees, with a lot of shed blood, and loss of family, fortunes and social respect. We will not win this by donating a few bucks here and there. If we are not willing to get on our knees, or become prostrate before a just God, repenting of abortion and letting our country go to the dogs, we will not see a change, regardless of who we elect. We've given up too much.

I pray that America awakens to the real issue that we are facing, and that is that we are nearly totally destitute of any moral convictions and we are all too willing to sit back and complain until it touches us in some way. I am not pointing fingers at you, but myself, and realizing that we all do this. We talk a good talk, but we do little. Not anything sacrificial, anyway. That is what it is going to come to.

If you think Obama is going to let the Catholic church problem go away, you are deceived. He wants to so vilify them, then we who are protestant and Jewish, until the left becomes totally unhinged at the mention of anything being based on moral issues, then he can say that we are the real problem, that if we were taken care of (reeducated, institutionalized, etc.) America;s problems would all go away. There would be dancing in the streets for a while. (Until they realized that the criminal element was still among them!) We are going to come to this sooner or later. With the heated rhetoric as it is, it cannot be too long. Only a real revival in America would buy us a little time.

29 posted on 01/13/2013 2:22:29 PM PST by Shery (in APO Land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Shery

bump


30 posted on 01/13/2013 2:29:06 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

mark


31 posted on 01/13/2013 2:34:52 PM PST by cyn (Benghazi.. the TRAVESTY continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shery

“that if we were taken care of (reeducated, institutionalized, etc.) America;s problems would all go away.”

Arbeitsziehungslager

Extortion-Care is the Government Work-Camp:


32 posted on 01/13/2013 2:37:19 PM PST by Varsity Flight (Extortion-Care is the Government Work-Camp: Arbeitsziehungslager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

a summation of the story.


33 posted on 01/13/2013 2:37:31 PM PST by cyn (Benghazi.. the TRAVESTY continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

That is awesome!


34 posted on 01/13/2013 2:39:02 PM PST by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 45semi
'“I feel safe with it, and I think we should all be able to defend ourselves as we need to,” Ellmers said.'

good for her, and the others mentioned in the story. I love the "WE SHOULD ALL...

thanks for the link. (heh, my 'mark' post above not needed!)

35 posted on 01/13/2013 2:46:02 PM PST by cyn (Benghazi.. the TRAVESTY continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

haha, yeah, that was my first thought, too: “wait, the pubs have a gun cave in DC? good on them!”

gun cave (noun): an idea whose time has come.

gun cave (verb): don’t go there.


36 posted on 01/13/2013 2:49:52 PM PST by cyn (Benghazi.. the TRAVESTY continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck
phuh. that idiot phil gingrey should just ask a a fellow Georgian.
37 posted on 01/13/2013 2:58:52 PM PST by cyn (Benghazi.. the TRAVESTY continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck
"But do you really need to be standing there shooting at a silhouette a shot a second or even quicker with that kind of weapon? For what purpose?",

When it's needed, it's called "suppressing fire"...

38 posted on 01/13/2013 3:43:15 PM PST by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bulwyf

I agree with you Rick. If the will was there it would have done the job a decade, or more, ago.

I include Rush, and a bunch of other leading conservatives, in that condemnation!


39 posted on 01/13/2013 4:23:59 PM PST by krunkygirl (force multiplier in effect...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Good stuff!

Your first paragraph had me thinking he was arrested on weapons charges because those are all we leave teachers armed with to defend our children that we have gathered into large groups in small spaces.


40 posted on 01/13/2013 4:44:05 PM PST by Blue Collar Christian (Pray for revival. <BCC><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson