Skip to comments.
How Many Bullets Are Enough?
American Thinker ^
| 01/15/2013
| William Sullivan
Posted on 01/15/2013 7:58:50 AM PST by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
To: SeekAndFind
As many as I say is enough.
2
posted on
01/15/2013 8:00:37 AM PST
by
chris37
(Heartless.)
To: FReepers
Please donate today.
Make it a monthly if you can.
Click the Pic
Support Free Republic
3
posted on
01/15/2013 8:01:23 AM PST
by
deoetdoctrinae
(Gun free zones are playgrounds for felons.)
To: chris37
I use the same formula we used as combat engineers for C4: P for plenty!
4
posted on
01/15/2013 8:01:54 AM PST
by
rfreedom4u
(I have a copy of the Constitution! And I'm not afraid to use it!)
To: SeekAndFind
“And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.” — Thomas Jefferson
Our Founders had very specific intentions in regard to firearms and the protection of the people’s right to own them. And the intent had little, if anything, to do with hunting or sport. The more practical use of guns is to kill or wound people who want to harm you, should that unpleasant and unthinkable need arise.
To: SeekAndFind
The 2nd Amendment is not about hunting. It is about the defense against tyranny and self-defense.
6
posted on
01/15/2013 8:02:55 AM PST
by
RoosterRedux
(The 2nd Amendment is our defense against tyranny.)
To: SeekAndFind
So that makes the old Iver Johnson and Harrington Richardson 9 shot .22 revolvers illegal?
7
posted on
01/15/2013 8:05:08 AM PST
by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(Click my name! See new paintings!)
To: SeekAndFind
The way the Left frames this is still just to make it appear that the gun issue is only about hunting, recreation or (reluctantly) self-protection.
The real question is this: How many bullets does it take to stop a tyrannical government?
8
posted on
01/15/2013 8:05:20 AM PST
by
newheart
(The greatest trick the left ever pulled was convincing the world it was not a religion.)
To: SeekAndFind
For the federal government, the answer is “many billions” - and not simply target rounds.
For the serfs, the answer is “none”.
Any questions?
9
posted on
01/15/2013 8:05:34 AM PST
by
dagogo redux
(A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
To: chris37
The government within the last two years has purchased enough ammunition to shoot each and every American 4 times over (conservatively). This does not include the US Military. These are for the IRS, the Post Office, DHS, et al.....
10
posted on
01/15/2013 8:05:48 AM PST
by
Gaffer
To: SeekAndFind
How many bullets are enough?
How many tyrants and their lackeys are there?
11
posted on
01/15/2013 8:07:10 AM PST
by
EricT.
(The GOP's sole purpose is to serve as an ineffective alternative to the Democrat Party.)
To: SeekAndFind
Being as cartridges are unitary, most integers are very large.
12
posted on
01/15/2013 8:07:21 AM PST
by
Scrambler Bob
( Concerning bo -- that refers to the president. If I capitalize it, I mean the dog.)
To: SeekAndFind
So NY lowers magazine capacity to 7 in direct response to the Sandy Hook shooting.
What will they lower it to after the next mass shooting?
13
posted on
01/15/2013 8:08:00 AM PST
by
umgud
To: chris37
Much like the axiom that 'experience is something you never get until just after you needed it,' an adequate number of rounds can not be determined until after the shooting stops.
Only then will you be able to determine whether or not you had enough.
14
posted on
01/15/2013 8:09:06 AM PST
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: SeekAndFind
I believe that it is time to order more.
To: SeekAndFind
Tell me, in all seriousness, would the world not be a better place with armed citizens and disarmed governments? Who has killed more innocents, governments or citizens?
16
posted on
01/15/2013 8:11:00 AM PST
by
muir_redwoods
(Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
To: SeekAndFind
Enough to overthrow a tyrannical government.
www.OathKeepers.org
To: SeekAndFind
"It's simple -- no one hunts with an assault rifle."
But they want to label our hunting rifle as 'assault rifle'
"No one needs ten bullets to kill a deer."
When '10 deer' attack, you need more. LOL
18
posted on
01/15/2013 8:14:11 AM PST
by
cotton
To: chris37
As many as I say is enough.This^
Are we now the old Soviet Union?? I cannot believe people are just lying down and getting steamrolled by these Marxists!
19
posted on
01/15/2013 8:14:21 AM PST
by
Obadiah
(Those who will not hear the messengers of peace, shall be made to hear the messengers of war.)
To: SeekAndFind
How many fricking politicans do we need?
20
posted on
01/15/2013 8:14:50 AM PST
by
Starstruck
(The police carry weapons for self protection)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson