Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just Because California Is Terrible, that Doesn’t Mean Texas Is Perfect.
Townhall.com ^ | January 22, 2013 | Daniel J. Mitchell

Posted on 01/22/2013 7:53:11 AM PST by Kaslin

Texas is in much better shape than California. Taxes are lower, in part because Texas has no state income tax.

No wonder the Lone Star State is growing faster and creating more jobs.

And the gap will soon get even wider since California voters recently decided to drive away more productive people by raising top tax rates.

But a key challenge for all governments is controlling the size and cost of bureaucracies.

Government employees are probably overpaid in both states, but the situation is worse in California, as I discuss in a recent interview with John Stossel.

But being better than California is not exactly a ringing endorsement of Texas fiscal policy.

A column in today’s Wall Street Journal, written by the state’s Comptroller of Public Accounts, points out some worrisome signs.

As the chief financial officer of the nation’s second-largest state, even I have found it hard to get a handle on how much governments are spending, and how much debt they’re taking on. Every level of government is piling up incredible bills. And they’re coming due, whether we like it or not. Even in low-tax Texas, property taxes have risen three times faster than the inflation rate and four times faster than our population growth since 1992. Our local governments, meanwhile, more than doubled their debt load in the last decade, to more than $7,500 in debt for every man, woman and child in the state. In Houston alone, city-employee pension plans are facing an unfunded liability of $2.4 billion. But too many taxpayers aren’t given the information they need to make informed decisions when they vote debt issues. Recently I spent several months holding about 40 town-hall meetings with Texans across our state. Each time, I asked the attendees if they could tell me how much debt their local governments are carrying. Not a single person in a single town had this information.

In other words, taxpayers need to be eternally vigilant, regardless of where they live. Otherwise the corrupt rectangle of politicians, bureaucrats, lobbyists, and interest groups will figure out hidden ways of using the political process to obtain unearned wealth.

Dan Mitchell Comparing Excessive Bureaucrat Compensation in Texas and California


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

1 posted on 01/22/2013 7:53:17 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I think the big difference is that Texans will do more to actually SOLVE their problems rather than perpetually kick the can down the road like California.


2 posted on 01/22/2013 7:56:32 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

When you do run across a Liberal Democrat from Texas he or she does tend to be a member of the extreme nutball fringe (Ronny Earl, Dan Rather, Molly Ivins, Jim Hightower, Sheila Jackson Lee, etc. etc. etc.)


3 posted on 01/22/2013 7:56:50 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I think Texans should be careful what they wish for. One of the reasons my state has headed to the right is because the liberals are fleeing to greener pastures and Texans are advertizing the greenest grass around.


4 posted on 01/22/2013 7:58:30 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hey, if they could give Austin away to someone I’m sure they would. Whaddaya gonna do?


5 posted on 01/22/2013 8:02:30 AM PST by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! [You can vote Democrat when you're dead]...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

We are considering moving there to add to the conservative vote, but we have noted pockets of liberals who are spouting the same drivel as here in CA.
Of particular concern is the growth in hispanic population and the future politically with many of these hispanic’s having a very socialist mindset.
Unfortunately most of the recent hispanic immigrants don’t have the hard working characteristics of those in the past..the new ones have an entitlement mentality and are catered to by the RATS.


6 posted on 01/22/2013 8:06:36 AM PST by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

Property taxes are based on property values. Further, Texans have voted to support schools by property taxes, not income taxes. However, there is no cap on taxes, which allows for increases in excess of inflation. That is one item to be addressed this session.


7 posted on 01/22/2013 8:10:05 AM PST by rstrahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
If Texas were to dig up Austin, put in on a trailer and then transport it to Southern California where a big hole is waiting for it, both states would be made more perfect in their particular beliefs, morals and principles.
8 posted on 01/22/2013 8:11:14 AM PST by Happy Rain ("Banning guns over Adam Lanza would be like banning speech over Bill Maher.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Every level of government is piling up incredible bills.

- - - - -

No. Texas State Government is back to running a surplus

Texas not the only state with a budget surplus
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2976362/posts

Boom: Energy cash influx leads to a state budget surplus in Texas
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2976126/posts


9 posted on 01/22/2013 8:12:57 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

I’m a supporter of standing and fighting but some places are just too far gone to save.


10 posted on 01/22/2013 8:14:30 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

“Hey, if they could give Austin away to someone I’m sure they would. Whaddaya gonna do?”

I feel the same way - but - then I remember.

It is possible for a state to require an enema. At that point, Austin becomes a vital necessity.

Other than that, there is no use for it whatsoever.


11 posted on 01/22/2013 8:15:58 AM PST by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rstrahan

The rollback rate provides the taxing unit approximately the same amount of tax revenue it spent the previous year for day-to-day operations plus an extra 8-percent cushion, and sufficient funds to pay its debts in the coming year. For school districts, the cushion is eight cents per $100 of property value, not 8 percent. If a unit adopts a tax rate that is higher than the rollback rate, voters in the unit can circulate a petition calling for an election to roll back (or limit) the size of the tax increase. For school districts, no petition is required. The school board calls for an election to ratify the adopted rate if the adopted rate exceeds the rollback rate.

http://www.window.state.tx.us/taxinfo/proptax/tx96_295/rates.html


12 posted on 01/22/2013 8:16:11 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rstrahan

It’s not just a Texas or california thing. Here in what is claimed to be a conservative suburb in ohio, the soccer moms here have a sense of entitlement that would make an inner city welfare queen blush. These doughy broads will call you every name in the book if you suggest they should pay full freight for the kids they brought into the world to play games and/or be in clubs at school. No...they would force people like me who ate a lot of mac annd cheese to send my kid to a private school to carry their water.


13 posted on 01/22/2013 8:19:54 AM PST by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Here's something I posted that shows a Texas senator trying to solve this.

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2980204/posts

14 posted on 01/22/2013 8:22:11 AM PST by manic4organic (It was nice knowing you, America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Agreed. Between the illegal aliens flooding north, and the leftist rats from the west coast jumping ship, it will not be long before they kill Texas just like they did in California. My only hope is that we are attracting enough conservatives to counter act the scum.


15 posted on 01/22/2013 8:22:46 AM PST by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
It’s very simple: Government is overhead. Let the overhead get away from you or be spent on unnecessary items and you’re DOA.
16 posted on 01/22/2013 8:23:02 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

“People will be hunting Democrats with dogs,” said Senator Phil Gramm of Texas in 2009.


17 posted on 01/22/2013 8:26:52 AM PST by dblshot (I am John Galt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheBorder

I’m happy to take the northern conservatives in Michigan to keep our momentum. We just need to find a way to convince liberals to go to Europe and stay there.


18 posted on 01/22/2013 8:28:06 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

“If Texas were to dig up Austin”

And if we Conservatives in California were to dig up SF (including Marin & Alameda Counties) and LA (including Hollywood) and transplant them next to Austin, we’d have a pretty decent state too! Actually, you could group everything down near Houston and it would work out better for both of us.


19 posted on 01/22/2013 8:32:20 AM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

“If Texas were to dig up Austin”

And if we Conservatives in California were to dig up SF (including Marin & Alameda Counties) and LA (including Hollywood) and transplant them next to Austin, we’d have a pretty decent state too! Actually, you could group everything down near Houston and it would work out better for both of us.


20 posted on 01/22/2013 8:32:29 AM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson