Posted on 02/02/2013 9:30:30 AM PST by bray
Be careful, however, that the exercise of your Freedom does not become a stumbling block to the weak. 1 Cor 8:9
What if everything about evolution is a lie? This would mean everything built on the theory of evolution is a fraud too. One of the primary gaps evolutionists never want to discuss is where life began? They have two primary theories, it either randomly developed from the primordial soup of came from another universe on an asteroid. Neither of these theories is believable yet the entire theory of evolution is built on them even though the odds are around one in infinity.
There is a huge void in scientific explanation how life and evolution started so most scientists dismiss it as not important or in any need of explanation or proof. They say there was a Big Bang when nothing became something and then exploded into an explosion creating the universe according to all of their infallible models. After billions and billions of years, life magically, oops, scientifically appeared to begin the evolutionary chain. The only explanation the Darwinists have for life beginning is time rather than God. For evolutionists God is to be mocked while billions and billions of years is a serious explanation.
If you ask an evolutionist how life began they will immediately tell you that how life began is not a part of evolution. If you continue to ax the question they will either call you all types of names the worst of which is Christian or explain how only scientists understand how life began. It usually comes down to their ability to intimidate and bully people and even fellow scientists into backing down from the obvious black hole of life’s beginning. They will usually begin their virtual firing squad for anyone daring to question the beginning of life as subhuman and not part of academia’s Holy of Holies.
Their primary explanation is the primordial soup explanation. After the Big Bang and the earth formed with millions of years of volcanoes and flowing lava when the hydrogen and oxygen combined to form water and the cooling began. Randomly the earth just happened to circle the sun at exactly the right orbit and rotation to make the water the perfect temperature for life. Then a few million years ago the chemicals randomly formed amino acids turning into some type of primitive bacteria and billions of years later that bacteria is making laptops.
The problem with this theory is how complex that random event had to be. As scientists become more and more familiar with amino acids and DNA they are finding it is far more complex than they ever knew it was. The genetic codes are still ninety eight percent unexplained as they find more and more unexplainable pieces of the complexity it points less and less to a random act. They were dismissing the unexplained parts as Junk DNA pieces since they have only been able to identify less than 2% of DNA code and invented the term junk for the rest. This should be insulting to their intelligence and certainly to ours. As they get deeper and deeper into the DNA code they are finding that there is no junk in the code and more complexity making the randomness even less possible. Simply Google junk DNA and find out the lies are being exposed by those brave enough to question science. It would take trillions and trillions of years for a DNA helix to form randomly not simply billions. http://www.psrast.org/junkdna.htm
Their second explanation which is not as universally accepted but basically a fallback theory is the amino acids and life source came from space. This was developed when they realized their primordial soup explanation really didn’t hold water. So they developed the asteroid explanation that a life seed came from a distant solar system billions of light years away and fell to the earth at just the right time and apparently into the ocean after it survived the billion year trip in a vacuum and thousand degree temps during entry into our atmosphere. The obvious questions are where did it come from and is the solar system it came from more or less superior than ours. It is ok to believe there are life forms on other planets but it is not ok to believe there is a God.
Simply because a scientist says over billions of years and billions of chances can make something happen does not make it so. This is only a theory but one that really does not withstand the smell test when you think about it. Fortunately for evolution, scientists generally refuse to question any of their theories and rely on consensus to verify and vilify their earth sized holes in their theories. They have had to fight for this theory so completely and ignore so many craters it has become more of a magic show than science. They use smoke and mirrors to keep people from asking the important questions or demanding an explanation of why those odds are looking more like infinity to one than the truth.
Imagine if scientists spent as much time, energy and money trying to find out if God is real than trying to disprove God. Science has become a religion based on an atheistic belief that we began as nothing and when we die we go back to nothing. It is a religion that places all of its faith in evolution with no explanation of how life arrived but when it came, random chance and mutations has got us to the point man can think, read and write. They have replaced God with billions and billions of years so time is the miracle of our creation. What is the difference between their faith in billions of years and faith in God?
Evolution became the first agenda driven junk science of the modern world. Science is basically following a 19th century idea which if they were true scientists would have been disproved millions of times over but the politics won’t allow it. They need to have people turn from God to force their hope and trust in the gummit. They need the people to believe gummit is their god where all of their hope exists.
If people would put their faith and hope in God they would not need the gummit and most of its controls. If people were saved by Jesus Christ and believed he is where all hope exists there would be a heaven beyond this earth, something the Darwinists can’t offer. If there is a heaven and hell and Jesus saves us sinners from that torture we deserve then we wouldn’t need gummit to regulate our lives as we would simply follow the rules set in the Bible. This is the communists’ greatest fear that people would be free to live their lives as they wish without their absolute control.
Imagine if science were to investigate the marvel of God’s creation and how it so miraculously relates together rather than attempting to use his design as proof there is no God? Science could actually be a positive to most lives rather than its need to be god and repeatedly use its power to control our lives with all of their junk science decrees. You can see all the failures of science everywhere you look so why do we continue to believe evolution with all of its massive gaps? It is time to evolve from evolution.
Pray for America
Uh, OK. You still haven’t answered my questions about the Ica Stones.
No, I didn’t know Mercedes was using it in a ad. As to the the use of reason and the big bang or as more recently expounded by scientists the Multible Big Bangs in progression, one either asks what was before or how many? I don’t have ultimate knowledge but I know infinity is only applicable in the abstract and cannot be a reality in “Beginnings.”
So then you agree that evolutions states that man is not special, but merely an 'advancement' of former animal life?
The difference seems to be between people that see the big picture vs. some of the parts.
Taken as a whole, Sympathy for the devil, is sarcasm. Commentary of you will. I think Morrison did the same thing with many of his songs. The attempt to provoke thoughtfulness ran headlong into the ease of selfishness.
Some would say that Jagger and Richards were great, the back beat with its roots in blues are really catchy.
Pick up a few words and roll with it.
Taken all together, that’s not on the table.
Because a religion without Jesus or God is atheism and versions of it. Who made you the arbitrator of religion?
Pray for America
WOW! Exactly the point!
Pray for America
You need to answer your own:
http://www.livescience.com/26616-new-feathered-dinosaur-found.html
Researchers have discovered a new species of feathered but flightless little dinosaur from the Jurassic period.
snip
This birdlike dinosaur's plumage was much more reduced compared with the feathers on some of its contemporaries, which suggests that feathering was already diversified by the Late Jurassic, adapted to different ecological niches and purposes, the researchers said. (The Jurassic period lasted from about 199.6 million to 145.5 million years ago.)
snip
This birdlike dinosaur's plumage was much more reduced compared with the feathers on some of its contemporaries, which suggests that feathering was already diversified by the Late Jurassic, adapted to different ecological niches and purposes, the researchers said. (The Jurassic period lasted from about 199.6 million to 145.5 million years ago.)
"This discovery sheds further doubt on the theory that the famous fossil Archaeopteryx — or 'first bird' as it is sometimes referred to — was pivotal in the evolution of modern birds," researcher Gareth Dyke, a senior lecturer in paleontology at the U.K.'s University of Southampton, said in a statement.
"Our findings suggest that the origin of flight was much more complex than previously thought."
Basking with the arrogance of uncertainty
Knowing the unknown remains
a mystery
Faith in the future of discover
They create webs of complexity.
Great videos. Great discussion when you get rid of the evolutionist thugs.
Pray for America
So, kill some other minority ~ how's about Schroedinger's cats ~ gotta' be some of them left. Go kill those cats and don't come back bothering us about quantum notions of prefabricated and self assembling universes unless you got some new evidence!
I’d like to continue that discussion on this thread, since it was the point after all.
I do need to run out for a bottle of wine and some smokes before we get into it.
BTW, the bacteria can pump copies of that ‘trait’ around so that all are protected ~ which kinda sorta cuts across the grain of the primary evolutionary thesis that we have a common origin. When it comes to bacteria EVERYBODY’s they’s daddy!
BTW, the bacteria can pump copies of that ‘trait’ around so that all are protected ~ which kinda sorta cuts across the grain of the primary evolutionary thesis that we have a common origin. When it comes to bacteria EVERYBODY’s they’s daddy!
You want to do Physics ?
let’s embrace uncertainty
Spooky action at a distance
Quantum entanglement
All of the CATS are left, don’t you know.
They never lived or died
Well they did actually try killing groups of people in Germany and Margaret Sanger’s Planned Abortionhood. It was purely planned evolution and still is.
Pray for America
But I didn't ask if life [human or otherwise] wasn't special, I asked if Jesus saying that God created mankind "male and female" implies a special creation thereof.
The problem is that evolution states that humans are descended from lower animals, moreover the simplest of these animals are asexual -- so to derive from any asexual origin is mutually exclusive of being created "male and female" -- and therein lies the contradiction.
There are three things that evolution does not explain, and indeed can be seen as counterproofs:
You've stated that evolution doesn't make statements of where life started up-thread, and while I have heard enough of the evolutionist's explanation of life to disagree with you I'll not argue the first point. The second, though, is quite interesting because in biology there's a "rule" that complex/multi-cellular organisms have: that the organism needs to survive, and secondly the organism needs to reproduce; the second is always yielded to the first. this is why your own body will shut down reproduction-faculties when you're put into [long-term] stressful situations.
But more than that, sexual reproduction needs [at-least*] two members (of differing sex) -- if the sexual descendent of an asexual ancestor appeared it would need the complementary sexed organism to also appear (a) in its lifetime, and (b) in its geographical vicinity. Therefore, if evolution is at all uncommon the odds are simply against sexuality being developed: the more uncommon, the greater the odds against.
As to the complexity issue -- the cell is itself a marvel of molecular engineering; in fact, any government on earth would kill to have [under their control] the the micro-miniture technology in your cells (like nano-scale chemical factories) or even common bacteria (like molecular-motors). The complexity there is orders and orders of magnitude more complex than random-chance could allow for. Grab the game "Spacechem", which is a puzzle-game involving atomic-scale molecule-building and transport, and imagine that as "the tip of the iceburg" for what your cells are doing.
* -- I seem to recall reading about tri-sexual organisms, it might have just been sci-fi though.
LOL -- And close ties to the Irish. ;)
So, kill some other minority ~ how's about Schroedinger's cats ~ gotta' be some of them left. Go kill those cats and don't come back bothering us about quantum notions of prefabricated and self assembling universes unless you got some new evidence!
Prefabricated, self-assembling universes would show a LOT of thought, I should think.
True -- The leap from single- to multiple-celled organisms is also one which, I believe, is not adequately explained by the theory of evolution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.