Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Obamacare Revolt: Physicians Fight Back Against the Bureaucratization of Health Care
Reason ^ | March 13, 2013 | Jim Epstein

Posted on 03/14/2013 7:05:21 PM PDT by neverdem

Will it make a difference?

Dr. Ryan Neuhofel, 31, offers a rare glimpse at what it would be like to go to the doctor without massive government interference in health care. Dr. Neuhofel, based in the college town of Lawrence, Kansas, charges for his services according to an online price list that's as straightforward as a restaurant menu. A drained abscess runs $30, a pap smear, $40, a 30-minute house call, $100. Strep cultures, glucose tolerance tests, and pregnancy tests are on the house. Neuhofel doesn't accept insurance. He even barters on occasion with cash-strapped locals. One patient pays with fresh eggs and another with homemade cheese and goat's milk. Dr. Ryan Neuhofel (Photo Credit: Tara Higgins/Fosse Photography)Credit: Tara Higgins/Fosse Photography

"Direct primary care," which is the industry term for Neuhofel's business model, does away with the bureaucratic hassle of insurance, which translates into much lower prices. "What people don't realize is that most doctors employ an army of people for coding, billing, and gathering payment," says Neuhofel. "That means you have to charge $200 to remove an ingrown toenail." Neuhofel charges $50.

He consults with his patients over email and Skype in exchange for a monthly membership fee of $20-30. "I realized people would come in for visits with the simplest questions and I'd wonder, why can't they just email me?" says Neuhofel. Traditional doctors have no way to get paid when they consult with patients over the phone or by email because insurance companies only pay for office visits.

Why did he choose this course? Neuhofel’s answer: “I didn’t want to waste my career being frustrated.”

This model is growing in popularity. Leading practitioners of direct primary care include Seattle, Washington-based Qliance, which has raised venture capital funding from Jeff Bezos, Michael Dell, and comedian (and Reason Foundation Trustee) Drew Carey; MedLion, which is about to expand its business to five states; and AMG Medical Group, which operates several offices in New York City. Popular health care blogger Dr. Rob Lamberts has written at length about his decision to dump his traditional practice in favor of this model.

"Since I started my practice, I seem to hear about another doctor or clinic doing direct primary care every other week." says Neuhofel.

Direct primary care is part of a larger trend of physician-entrepreneurs all across the country fighting to bring transparent prices and market forces back to health care. This is happening just as the federal government is poised to interfere with the health care market in many new and profoundly destructive ways.

Obamacare, which takes full effect in 2014, will drive up costs and erode quality—and Americans will increasingly seek out alternatives. That could bring hordes of new business to practitioners like Neuhofel, potentially offering a countervailing force to Obamacare. (One example, the Surgery Center of Oklahoma's Dr. Keith Smith, profiled for Reason TV in September, is doing big business offering cash pricing for outpatient surgery at prices about 80 percent less than at traditional hospitals.)

Health "insurance" is more than just insurance; it's also "a payment plan for routine expenses," as University of Chicago business school economist John Cochrane puts it in a superb recent paper(PDF). The late free-market economist Milton Friedman pointed out that we insure our houses against fire and our cars against major damage, but we don't also insure ourselves against cutting the lawn and buying gas. That's the main reason innovation almost never makes health care cheaper. Most patients never see the bill for an ingrown toenail removal or a glucose tolerance test, so doctors have little incentive to seek ways to offer their services for less. For simple consultations, why bother with Skype when insurance will pay full price for an office visit.

Insurance plans that cover everything, a situation that came about largely because of a quirk in our tax code, have also led to the "bureaucratization of medical care," Friedman wrote in a 2001 essay, in which "the caregiver has become, in effect, an employee of the insurance company or...the government."

Dr. Lisa Davidson had 8 years of frustration while running a successful traditional practice in Denver, Colorado. She had 6,000 patients when she decided to stop taking insurance and adopt the same business model as Neuhofel. Her patient list has dropped to about 2,000. She used to spend about 15 minutes with each patient and now it's more like 45 minutes. "We're on track to make more money and take better care of our patients," says Davidson. "It's a win-win all around."Dr. Lisa Davidson (pictured to the far right) and her staff

Before adopting direct primary care, Davidson was unhappy working at the practice she had built because the insurance system imposed a way of doing business that resembled an assembly line. "It's true that in 2014, many more people will have insurance, so there will be a profound need for primary care doctors," says Davidson. "You might say I've done a disservice by dramatically cutting the size of my practice. However, if we make it desirable again to be a primary care physician more people will want to do it."

Under Obamacare, more and more doctors are becoming employees of large hospitals, where there will be more control over how they practice medicine. Hoover Institution Senior Fellow Dr. Scott Atlas fears this will cause a brain drain in medicine. "Really smart people want autonomy, and when you take that away it's naive to think you're going to get really bright people becoming doctors," says Atlas. "The best doctors could excel at any profession, so why go into medicine if they won't have the opportunity to be their best?"

When she was operating a traditional practice, Davidson witnessed firsthand how our "payment plans for routine expenses" drive up prices and block innovation. She recalls that one insurance company paid $118 for a routine PSA test. Now that her patients pay the bill directly the cost is $18. Insurance used to pay $128 for a bag of IV fluid. Now Davidson doesn't bother passing on the cost of IV bags because they run $1.50 each.

Dr. Eric Bricker is the medical director at Compass, a Dallas-based company that helps individuals with high-deductible insurance plans. In a previous job, Bricker was a finance consultant for hospitals, giving him firsthand knowledge of how health insurance drives up prices. "When insurance companies and hospitals negotiate," says Bricker, "it's an exercise in horse trading." For example, an insurance company might let a hospital get away with charging $2,000 for an MRI, says Bricker. In exchange, the hospital agrees to charge the bargain price of $2,000 to deliver a baby. "You do that mixing and matching," says Bricker, "and at the end of the day it works out about even."

According to Bricker, this horse-trading method provides an opportunity for hospitals to earn windfall profits: If the hospital gets $2,000 for MRIs, it will start encouraging patients to get more MRIs.

Given how prices are set, it's no mystery why in health care high costs often correlate with low quality. Bricker cites one facility in Dallas, where a 3-tesla MRI (the more teslas, the higher the resolution) can be had for $860, while a nearby facility offers a 1.5-tesla MRI for $2,500. The former facility stays in business only because many of its customers don't know the difference. They pay the same $20 co-pay wherever they go for an MRI.

So Bricker co-founded Compass, which works with about 1,200 firms to guide their employees to those doctors and testing facilities that offer both high quality and low prices. These employees have an incentive to seek out value because they're responsible for paying a large portion of their own routine medical costs before their insurance coverage kicks in.

High-threshold plans are exploding in popularity, which is a promising trend. According to a 2012 report(PDF) by the Kaiser Family Foundation, about 31 percent of firms now offer health plans in which patients pay most routine costs out of pocket, like a Health Savings Account (HSA) or Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA), and 19 percent of covered workers have one of these plans. High-deductible plans go a long way towards unbundling our "payment plans for routine expenses" from the catastrophic coverage that should be the sole function of health insurance.Growing Popularity of Consumer-Driven Health Care Plans (Source: Employer Health Benefits 2012 Annual Survey, Kaiser Family Foundation)

"These plans offer hope," says Scott Atlas, "because they drive patients to care about what things cost. High deductible policies also eliminate much of the administrative cost of insurance because there's no need to file claims for routine charges."

Obamacare imposes new mandates on high-deductible plans, but it doesn't outlaw them. "The most devastating thing Obamacare could have done is to say it's illegal to have a deductible of more than $200," says Bricker. "So within the existing confines we can still have a successful business and help people."

Americans with high-deductible policies still have the misfortune of shopping for services in a health care market dominated by traditional health insurance. Since insurance companies and the government still pay the vast majority of medical bills, it's nearly impossible to find doctors who offer competitive and transparent prices.

A Houston-based start up called Snap Health is trying to remedy that by signing up doctors to list their prices on its website. Currently, there are 290 tests and about 100 doctors to choose from. You can buy an EKG (about $35), have a kidney stone analyzed ($250), or get a heart check up (about $400). Patients choose the procedure they want, pay online with a credit card, and then show up for their appointments. Snap Health's CEO and Co-founder Dr. David Wong says the biggest obstacle to building up a menu of offerings is that doctors accustomed to getting paid by insurance companies have no idea how to price their services for direct-paying clients.

Snap Health co-founders Dr. Christopher Langan and Dr. David Wong (Photo Credit: Brad Ottosen)Credit: Brad OttosenWong says he launched his business partly on the belief that Obamacare will drive up health care costs, causing more and more companies and individuals to drop out and start paying their own health care bills. Neuhofel agrees that Obamacare could be good for business. "I expect some real unintended consequences after Obamacare is implemented. There could be more uninsured people."

Lisa Davidson plans to enter the state-based exchanges that Obamacare will put in place. She cites a provision in the Affordable Care Act that explicitly allows direct primary care practitioners to marry their services with a catastrophic plan and enter the exchanges, although the details of what will be permitted under the law haven't been hammered out yet.

Eric Bricker also sees opportunity to work within the Affordable Care Act. "Compass is trying to make lemonade out of lemons," he says. "I think you can incrementally make improvements within Obamacare, and the situation will change over time."

The efforts of these doctors and others will undoubtedly help constrain exploding health care costs and improve care. But it's hard to fathom how within the legal constraints of Obamacare we'll see the sort of innovations that could solve the very problems that, ironically, were used to justify Obamacare's passage. As economist John Cochrane puts it(PDF), without government meddling, health insurance would be "individual, portable, life‐long, guaranteed‐renewable, transferrable, [and] competitive." And going to the doctor would be as simple and straightforward as eating out. What needs to be done to get there is painfully obvious.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: healthcare; obamacare
There's a video at the source.
1 posted on 03/14/2013 7:05:21 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Soon the government will say what he is doing is illegal, count on it.


2 posted on 03/14/2013 7:07:20 PM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Where were they two years ago?


3 posted on 03/14/2013 7:09:49 PM PDT by clintonh8r (Happy to be represented by Lt. Col. Allen West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

sfl


4 posted on 03/14/2013 7:10:36 PM PDT by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

They’ll be pilloried for heresy.


5 posted on 03/14/2013 7:11:17 PM PDT by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Soon the government will say what he is doing is illegal, count on it.

I understand it is illegal in France, heard some French doctors setup shop in Northern Italy on the weekends and work for cash to keep food on their tables.

6 posted on 03/14/2013 7:12:23 PM PDT by JMJJR ( Newspeak is the official language of Oceania)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JMJJR
heard some French doctors setup shop in Northern Italy on the weekends and work for cash to keep food on their tables.

Back in the early 80's. I worked in Vancouver Canada. At that time, docs incomes were capped. If they had a good practice, by November they earned as much as they were allowed for a calendar year.

So they either practiced for free until January, or closed the doors for a month or two. Those who closed often would drive down to Bellingham WA and work the ER's. That income was not taxed in Canada (their tax rules) and often covered 50% of the gross they made in Canada in the 10 or 11 months they worked there.

7 posted on 03/14/2013 7:20:03 PM PDT by llevrok (Keep your arms out. It makes it harder for them to throw a net over you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

That’s my first reaction

They seemed strangely quiet given the circumstances and risks


8 posted on 03/14/2013 7:22:11 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Yup, that is what happens with a Government monopoly.


9 posted on 03/14/2013 7:27:48 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Commune Obama"care" violates Anti-Trust Laws, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Correction. Freepers need to learn that big gov and big business is the enemy of individual freedom. Insurance companies will tell gov to make direct care illegal. They will use the liberal wing of the population (and the liberal politicians) to vote against it.


10 posted on 03/14/2013 7:32:13 PM PDT by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Exactly what I was going to say. The Government will either make this illegal or the Insurance Companies will refuse them malpractice insurance at the request of Government.


11 posted on 03/14/2013 7:35:15 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

too little too late. these pricks should have taken action before this crap got passed into law. they will reap what they sowed. good riddance to all the useless doctors that will be leaving practice. don’t let the door hit you on the way out quitters.


12 posted on 03/14/2013 7:47:20 PM PDT by Deathtomarxists (qucker fivepenny nine and two leaves down the plug bucket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat
They seemed strangely quiet given the circumstances and risks

For the most part they had no organization to speak for them.

Recall that the American Medical Association was all in favor of Obamacare. Like AARP, the association was run by liberals and they were co-opted by the Democrats early on.

13 posted on 03/14/2013 8:03:18 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: andyk
They’ll be pilloried for heresy.

They will lose hospital privileges.

14 posted on 03/14/2013 8:03:33 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Soylent Green is Boomers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: okie01

And the AMA only represented about 17% of physicians - many of whom are academics. I suspect that percentage is lower now.


15 posted on 03/14/2013 8:25:12 PM PDT by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
Schumer’s Transfer Tyranny

Schumer's 'Background Check' Bill Criminalizes Most Gun Loans and Registers Firearms

Has the world started cooling? Hints from 4 of 5 global temperature sets…

Climategate: FOIA – The Man Who Saved The World

Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

16 posted on 03/14/2013 8:25:42 PM PDT by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deathtomarxists

Retiring ASAP is an honorable thing to do in face of this LIBtard reality. Only when people face the effect of LIBtard reality will anything change. Suffer all.


17 posted on 03/14/2013 8:29:21 PM PDT by ogen hal (First amendment or reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping!


18 posted on 03/14/2013 8:43:24 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

God bless all these doctors!

May they prosper without any government money — certainly looks that way!


19 posted on 03/14/2013 8:57:34 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

The American Medical Association was in favor of Obamacare, as you correctly noted. However, a majority of the physicians who are members
of the AMA were against it. The leadership of the AMA are cowards and
over ruled the membership.


20 posted on 03/14/2013 9:07:58 PM PDT by Palio di Siena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

They will lose hospital privileges.”

The hoops you have to jump through to just get auth to see your patient in the hospital and all the hassles are beyond ridiculous. Easier to refer them, let the hospital staff handle their treatment and then just follow them after they are released, which is what more and more doctors are doing.

Some hospitals would also really prefer not having to deal with doctors from the “outside”.


21 posted on 03/14/2013 9:37:02 PM PDT by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Soon the government will say what he is doing is illegal, count on it.

Yes, it will. Will it say they can't get out of medicine too?

22 posted on 03/14/2013 9:40:40 PM PDT by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

I know that there were some very similar sounding practices in the New York City area which had the government go after them and try to shut them down.


23 posted on 03/14/2013 11:41:07 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I know the rumor mill about Obamacare is working overtime, but has anyone else heard this:?

You pay XXX for your health insurance. To Blue Cross or whomever.

You are single & pay $400 a month==$4800 a year.

For years, you don’t use this insurance—you are basically pretty healthy & not a hypochrondriac, going to the doc for the simplest of things.

Then something big happens-—say you need gall bladder surgery.

You have paid $4800 that year for your insurance premiums——and your surgery costs $85,000 over your co-pay, which the insurance company pays.

Do Obamacare rules say that you MUST claim the difference......$80,200 as INCOME on your tax return for that year!!!???

Because ‘you received more value from your surgery than you actually paid for yourself’

If this is true, what the hell is insurance for?

I pay $800 a year for my house insurance, I have a fire which destroyes everything & the replacement value I get from STATE FARM is NOW INCOME????

How about a car insurance where someone steals my car & I get a replacement?

This is just plain nuts, IMO.

BUT-—I can see Pelosi & Obama putting just such a set of rules into those 2700 evil pages of rules, and encouraging Sebelius to enforce such rules.

Has anyone heard anything about this???


24 posted on 03/15/2013 8:23:17 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

This is a bit innovative for primary care, but even five years ago many providers were beginning to decline to accept Medicare, and the number of doctors who are dropping out of the system and declining all insurance is increasing. If it were just a few of them the government might crack down on them, and indeed the government (the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, part of HHS) offers incentives for the doctors who comply while punishing those who don’t.

However, if you look at the lists of “best doctors” ( = most fashionable and high-priced specialists) published in the cool city magazine of every major city, they all have one thing in common: very few of them accept insurance. If you can’t afford to pay them, you don’t go see them. Some of them offer a “concierge” medical practice, in which the patient pays a flat annual fee for special, personal, on-demand care.

These are the physicians who are either very brilliant, very technology-forward, very astute about marketing, or have some other trait that makes them highly successful. They golf with legislators, make contributions, make speeches, give interviews, and perform plastic surgery on senators’ wives, so they are not going to be forced to work for a hospital or take insurance. As long as they have their autonomy, the government won’t compel doctors to join the system or take insurance. It can, of course, hold out illusory incentives and not-so-illusory penalties for a refusal to join up.

Speaking from personal experience, I can tell you that it’s very hard to transition from the typical insurance-accepting practice to cash-on-the-barrelhead or concierge care, unless one is a pediatrician, family practice provider, or internist. Unless the practice is pretty darn lucrative, it’s tough to say goodbye to half or three-quarters of one’s patients and try to gear up again with a different and untested business model, when all the expenses (medical insurance, taxes, staff salaries, taxes, office rent, taxes, equipment, taxes, utilities, taxes, supplies, and taxes) remain constant. It’s a huge gamble. My hat’s off to the doctors in this article who are making it work.


25 posted on 03/15/2013 9:15:33 AM PDT by ottbmare (The OTTB Mare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ottbmare

This is a lost cause... Eventually, the states will yank their licenses to practice. They are threatening the status quo. You can’t be a doctor without a license...legally.


26 posted on 03/15/2013 3:38:59 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

I believe the best and brightest will head offshore and set up clinics to serve wealthy Americans who want better than the govt can provide.

And those entities will provide a lot of good jobs for support staff looking to escape from the tyranny of progressive govt.


27 posted on 03/15/2013 3:42:51 PM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: All

I started going to my dentist in 1995. Back then he didn’t take insurance. A tooth extraction was $25. Now it’s more than a hundred.


28 posted on 03/15/2013 8:36:11 PM PDT by Terry Mross (How long before America is gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Dr. Welby is back in business? Quick, call the FTC! He hasn’t made his ‘protection’ payments to the Med Mafia.


29 posted on 03/17/2013 2:47:35 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

>> “I believe the best and brightest will head offshore...” <<

.
Juarez, Ensenada...


30 posted on 03/17/2013 2:49:32 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I didn’t see anything about malpractice insurance. The article was long, and I admit I did some skimming.


31 posted on 03/17/2013 3:10:30 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson