Posted on 03/15/2013 6:25:10 AM PDT by Kaslin
How can anyone take President Obama seriously when he tells us our national debt is no big deal? Well, we have to take him seriously, because, unserious thinking or not, he has serious power, including the power to obstruct progress on reducing the debt.
I'm not making this up, of course, which is too bad because it illustrates why it is so hard for Republicans to work with this man. He neither views the fiscal world from the same lens nor shares the goal of significant debt reduction.
In an interview with ABC News' George Stephanopoulos, Obama said, "We don't have an immediate crisis in terms of debt. In fact, for the next 10 years, it's going to be in a sustainable place."
Not only is that delusional on its face based on what we already know but there is no telling what kinds of financial strains his favorite monster, Obamacare, is going to have on the debt or what kinds of extraordinary circumstances might necessitate spending surges over the next decade.
But we needn't speculate about unknowns, because the knowns are horrifying enough. The enormity of our annual interest payments on the debt alone renders Obama's dismissiveness about the debt surreal.
Obama carried his bizarre insouciance about the debt into his photo op meetings with congressional Republicans as part of his cynically conceived "charm offensive." According to Roll Call, Obama indicated to Republicans that "balancing the budget over the next 10 years is not on his priority list."
Let's stop right there. Please tell me, you romantic advocates for bipartisan harmony, how the GOP can work with a man to solve an undeniable debt crisis when his blind apathy makes Mad magazine's Alfred E. Neuman look engaged?
House Speaker John Boehner framed the problem quite accurately when he summarized the parties' respective positions. "Republicans want to balance the budget. The president doesn't," said Boehner. "Republicans want to solve our long-term debt problem. The president doesn't. We want to unlock our energy resources to put more Americans back to work. The president doesn't."
So what does Obama propose to do about this non-problem that Republicans are coercing him into dealing with? Simple: He'll agree to $2 in spending cuts for every $1 in additional tax revenue.
Just swell. Tell me the last time Obama or any other Democrat at the federal level honored his commitment to reduce spending in exchange for tax increases? Republicans have repeatedly fallen for this ploy and given in to immediate tax hikes, only to see Democrats renege on their promises to cut spending.
But it's actually worse than before because we have abundant evidence that Democrats don't speak the same language as Webster's-friendly humans do when it comes to spending cuts. To them, "cuts" doesn't mean "cuts" any more than "is" meant "is" to Bill Clinton. Obama's budget gurus are masters of budget gimmicks and double counting to achieve cuts on paper (call them "paper cuts") that are no more real than my professional basketball career.
In other words, even if Obama honored an agreement to impose "cuts" in exchange for yet more tax increases, he wouldn't be cutting anything, because his promised cuts are smoke and mirrors. To hear him tell the story, he's already made trillions of dollars' worth of cuts.
But you can bank on the fact that his coveted tax increases would be real and that they would further burden those still contributing to the economy, with no guarantee that they would increase revenues at all. They would, however, likely harm the economy and thus further expand the dependency state.
The recently released budget that Senate Democrats finally produced, four years late, underscores the Democrats' unseriousness about the debt and spending cuts. The proposed budget would extract nearly $1 trillion more in new taxes and supposedly include an equal amount in cuts. But true to Democrats' form, the proposed "cuts" include $240 billion in war spending that wasn't projected and $242 billion in saved interest expenses on the debt based on fantasy debt savings from the tax increases.
Republicans need to launch a 24/7 public campaign blitz explaining Paul Ryan's new budget, which is based on real and specific numbers and proposes to balance the budget in 10 years and make structural changes to our entitlement programs to put them on a sustainable path.
Democrats and liberal journalists are already out in force, savaging Ryan and the other Republicans -- again -- for their good faith effort to save the nation from a Grecian-style bankruptcy.
I am convinced that if the Republicans will strike back with as much fervor as Obama constantly hits them and take their winning case to the people, the people will finally learn the truth: that Ryan's plan would not throw seniors or the poor under the bus and is, in fact, their best chance for the future and certainly the best hope currently on the table to restore America's solvency.
The Republicans (with a few conservative exceptions)
support Obama and al Qaeda.
Whatever weapons Obama and Holder give them,
they support him.
Whatever Constitutional directed he micturates upon,
they support him.
Whatever taxes and attacks he makes upon the American
people, they support him.
Learned another new word today - “insouciance”
I’m sorry but anymore these days when I hear about how the GOP needs to do this or that to promote conservative values, I feel like I’m hearing someone trying to fight the Iraq War with swords, muskets, bronze cannon, and soldiers marching on the battlefield in ranks of three.
The current GOP can’t handle Reality!
That’s about the size of it. It is a one party state. GOP is the stalking horse for statism.
We have an Iranian borne chief advisor who apparently has some Rasputin-like control over our President (very unfortunately) pushing him in twisted ways. Compound that with is makeup which is apparently borne of a very conflicted socialist family and a rigid Muslim indoctrination. This, coupled with his nonexistent actual substantive work experience or ethic, does not bode well for a strategic approach on trying to rationally explain to the leeching, entitlement-craving half of this country who don't give a damn - just what they get.
To win, if we still can, requires an UNCOMPROMISING candidate that can instill AMERICA into those of us still left and to ENSURE they vote together and forget these kooks and appeasers who the GOP-e tries to foist off on us a ‘conservative’. And with this, I don't see anyone on the horizon like that now.
Bald-faced LIE. He says this all the while using tax dollars to purchase BILLIONS of hollow point bullets, thousands of MRAPS (armored personell carriers), and thousands of shiny new AR-15s. He says this all the while preparing, with protecting the federales from the future by moving to attacks on the 2A and firearm confiscation. His spending indicates he wants the collapse to occur ON his watch, so that he is positioned to take advantage of it. It's the O'Dinga/Zelaya Way!
My first thought after I heard Obama make that remark was, someone is going to label Obama as “Sequestered from Reality”
Maybe Jeb will bring it all back HA_HA
So true. Kwame Kilpatrick (former Detroit mayor now in federal prison...Detroit now has an emergency financial manager (and is bankrupt)) on steroids with the-powers-that-be printing money and the enablers in Congress enjoying their largesse.
Too Big & Too Many To Jail?
Socialism Is Legal Plunder - Frederic Bastiat
POSSOTUS BUMP!
--That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Here’s the “reality” -
it is mathematically impossible to avoid a severe, heavy, and devastating economic crash
given our debt level and current spending.
Absolutely, positively! Give us facts and figures. Thank you Paul Ryan for showing them how it's done!
I've said this for ages -- it's about argument framing. For example, the liberals mouth off about climate change being 'settled science' even though it isn't because the facts don't bear it out. Conservatives could say all the things above and frame the argument because they're true. The budget debate is settled numbers.
The problem is that for too long people like John Boehner have talked the talk but haven't walked the walk. Republicans have all the financial arguments but do not possess the conservative political will in their leadership to implement what they say they believe.
The budget debate is settled. We're right. They're wrong. Now let's start acting like it and frame the argument in such a fashion that it appeals to the suffering middle class that is being destroyed by Baraq Obama.
I've been hearing this same song for over twenty years about how the Republicans have to this or they have to that to beat those wascally Democrats. When are people going to realize that the GOP is NEVER going to beat the Democrats because they don't want to beat the Democrats. Not with this crew running the party.
The Republicans and Democrats are like two gangsters that run a crooked dice game. They may fight with and try to undercut each other but they do everthing they can to protect the game.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.