Posted on 04/01/2013 12:12:39 PM PDT by matt04
People in grief will grasp at the most illogical thoughts. It does not give them the right to abridge other peoples’ rights, however.
!!!! what he said!
Seriously, you make a hell of a lot of sense.
****Newtown families are making a last ditch effort to prevent another mass shooting. ****
Yet, of all the laws proposed, would ANY OF THEM actually have prevented the killings from happening?
If the proposed laws would not have prevented the killings, then what is the purpose of these new proposed laws other than to obtain CONTROL over the public.
these people remind me of The Stepford Wives.
That’s the question I ask each and every time I write to one of these yahoos. Show me ONE bill that would prevent *gun violence*...that’s usually the point where they stop returning my emails/ calls. Meh.
“Nicole Hockley said she believes her 6-year-old son, Dylan, and maybe another child could have escaped if the gunman Lanza had to stop and reload more often.”
Someone should tell Nicole Hockley that her 6 year old son Dylan would be alive if the teacher or principles had something more than their bodies to throw at the gunman.
You can’t make a law to disarm a lawless man, you can only uses anther gun to put them down before they do more harm.
Message to the grieving Newtowner’s: It wasn’t the second amendment that killed your children. All those broad leftist butts bent over in front of you laying out the carpet on the gun control rallying stage for you are only using your grief to further their agenda. Your loss doesn’t mean squat to them. Only the politics of the crisis for them to use to their advantage is of value to them. Their goal is more dangerous to many more than you lost in Newtown.
THEY ARE USING YOU. DON’T LET THEM USE YOU, AND YOUR DECEASED LOVED ONE FOR THEIR ANTI AMERICAN GOALS.
We need to give them logical thoughts to grasp upon instead. Rational Solid truths such as the fact that had there been an armed guard in the school her son would still be alive.
But had there been a law against gun ownership the madman would still have obtained a gun and killed him.
Do scissors count?
The left claims only eeeeeevil republicans or conservatives use people to further their political goals. When I hear similar statements, it just means they are projecting.
The implication was a weapon of at least comparable range & stopping power.
But yes Scissors count provided that you can covertly close the distant and slit his throat before shoots you dead.
Realistically a simple shotgun, rifle or hand gun in the hands of a few different school officials might have been far more effective.
“The left claims only eeeeeevil republicans or conservatives use people to further their political goals. When I hear similar statements, it just means they are projecting.”
The left are a bunch of lying low lifes, Nobody parades and exploits victims like they do. They play this book so much sometimes they don’t even bother to uses real victims.
This is but one of many facts we should not fail to remind folks of when we speak of charging the left with their abusive political practices.
Remember make, and keep lists!
Gee whiz. What a shock. They only missed by 24 hours.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.