"You Creationists are Not Qualified to Discuss Such Matters!"

http://www.apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=9&article=4546 ^ | 2012 Apologetics Press, Inc. All rights reserved. | Jeff Miller, Ph.D.

[kimtom]

"..A common quibble laid at the feet of the creationist is that he/she is not qualified to speak about scientific matters relating to the creation/evolution controversy..."

[DoodleDawg]

Many Geologist are creationist.

I would say that many, many more are not.

[MrB]

The information necessary to turn a rational human into a raving jackass is inate, so is not the evidence you’re seeking.

[allmendream]

And creationists who reject ANY speciation (as one did on this very thread) must therefore believe that every modern species was on the Ark.

So either every modern species was on the Ark, or only those “kinds” that could actually fit. If the first then fitting them all on was a miracle - as well as making sure all the marsupials headed towards Australia. If the second then, once again, SUPER DUPER (micro) evolution!

[MrB]

So that proves that the smaller sized group is wrong.

[Moonman62]

I’ll tell Pope Francis and the billions of Catholics you have spoken for God on this matter.

I think Catholics are much better on the issue than Protestants.

[sickoflibs]

Thanks for the laugh... turning tables on the rock throwers is always a blast.

[kimtom]

“...There is a HUGE amount of evidence (it isn’t and never will be “proof” - science doesn’t do “proof”) for common descent of species - i.e. macro evolution....”

but when did the ape (chimp , since you like that one)
become a man??
That evidence does not prove evolution. only change within a species, which is not denied.
“species” as we understand it, for it is easy to define a word and use it to clobber someone.
RV sounds impressive, but does not prove what you imply.

Do you believe man descented from apes???

why?

[DoodleDawg]

So that proves that the smaller sized group is wrong.

It indicates that, when confronted with the same evidence, the overwhelming majority of experts in the field disagree with people like Woodmorappe and his theories. And would indicate that he is wrong.

[kimtom]

“”...Thanks for the laugh... turning tables on the rock throwers is always a blast...”

hey, you are welcome!!!!

[MrB]

As I said at the top of the thread - “it must be true because so many people believe it”.

[DoodleDawg]

So that proves that the smaller sized group is wrong.

It indicates that, when confronted with the same evidence, the overwhelming majority of experts in the field disagree with people like Woodmorappe and his theories. And would indicate that he is wrong.

[DoodleDawg]

The information necessary to turn a rational human into a raving jackass is inate, so is not the evidence you’re seeking.

I'm seeing a whole lot of it around here today.

[kimtom]

“...Many Geologist are creationist.
I would say that many, many more are not....”

Yes, of course!!!
wouldn’t you say there are more dolts, than geniuses?

majority agreement, nor statements by learned men,make a matter true.
That is especially when there is an agenda.(not hidden)

[DoodleDawg]

As I said at the top of the thread - “it must be true because so many people believe it”.

It's true because the evidence indicates it is true. At least to the overwhelming majority of people who have studied it.

[sickoflibs]

“and then God made the Sun. So to test this creationist (real science) theory I went outside and it was sunny. So we checked off that theory as being shown true as there would be no sun otherwise, it was Created just as we claim it is....now lets talk about those bones...”

You cant lose debates with easy to make UP stuff like this.

[DoodleDawg]

Yes, of course!!! wouldn’t you say there are more dolts, than geniuses?

Depends on the thread.

[kimtom]

“.You cant lose debates with easy to make UP stuff like this....”

ok

(delusional)

[sickoflibs]

More
“AHAH I proved our Creationist claims were true when the Sun was outside waiting for me on that sunny day. Just prove that the Sun was not there and you win the debate but you cant. A Sun exists so it means all 'the Kinds' were on the Ark as I said. We win every debate because..our are arguments are better .....now how about those missing bones??”

Creationism for fun and profit

[kimtom]

“..The information necessary to turn a rational human into a raving jackass is inate, so is not the evidence you’re seeking...”

You say some of the darnest things!!!!!

keep it up :)

[DManA]

You’ll never get proof.