Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul: Police Manhunt For Boston Marathon Bombing Suspect Scarier Than Attack
The Washington Times ^ | April 30, 2013 | Cheryl K. Chumley

Posted on 04/30/2013 5:30:30 AM PDT by Biggirl

Former Rep. Ron Paul said the law enforcement that swarmed around Boston in the days following the marathon bombings was scarier than the actual terrorist attack.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: bbronpaul; boston; bostonbombings; lockdown; marathon; paul; police; ronpaul; tsarnaev
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last
To: Biggirl

He was Right, Millions just listening and not understanding it is their personnel responsibility and to allow military style search for 1 person. Had this individual tried to come into our home only one would have walked out at best.

We are becoming a nation of wimps, who in general, do not understand out Rights or Responsibilities.


21 posted on 04/30/2013 6:17:48 AM PDT by jafojeffsurf (Return to the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

As I posted on another thread last night:

A little lesson on the law: Allowing police to come into your home, even if it’s just for a new officer to introduce him/herself, is silent consent. If the officer sits down on your couch, feels something funny, pulls your unregistered revolver from the seat cushions, you’re in trouble. The same can happen in your vehicle. The cop pulls you over, asks you to get out, and starts going through your trunk. You have nothing to hide so why protest! You don’t say no so by doing so you’re saying yes. He finds your teenage son’s friend’s bag of weed. Guess who’s going to jail for this? I just took part in a huge Bill of Rights high school assembly. These scenarios are exactly the examples that the lawyers presented. If those cops saw anything in those houses, the fact that the residents let them in to look for a terrorist is irrelevant.


22 posted on 04/30/2013 6:22:00 AM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Yes, everything can be used against them. Failing to tell the police no and opening the door to your home is silent consent.


23 posted on 04/30/2013 6:23:37 AM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

I can’t say he’s wrong. What bothered me most is the way the people of Watertown simply bent over and took it. I hope anyone there who refused to let the police in and were forcibly searched will follow up with a lawsuit.


24 posted on 04/30/2013 6:24:25 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: windsorknot
Some criticism of the manhunt may be valid, but how many Bostonians died or lost limbs at the hands of law enforcement officers during the manhunt?

In the Dorner manhunt the police shot up several completely innocent people in their vehicles. Fortunately no one was killed.

Considering all the rounds thrown by police while the last suspect lay bleeding and unarmed inside a boat, I think they were more lucky than anything else in this last go around.

25 posted on 04/30/2013 6:27:45 AM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

It was a civilian resident who found Tsarnaev, not a cop. The search did nothing to find him. Simply cordoning the area would have produced the same result.


26 posted on 04/30/2013 6:27:56 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun
RE :”Yes, everything can be used against them. Failing to tell the police no and opening the door to your home is silent consent.”

Yes, telling the police they can search your home is consent. But what about those who were not home or who didnt answer the door? And if they were say drug dealers with lots of the product out in the open (inside) they could just refuse.

If those people agreed to a search then it wasnt much of a police state action.

27 posted on 04/30/2013 6:28:33 AM PDT by sickoflibs (To GOP : Any path to US citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Look I have no problem with people using this search tactic to bash the governor. If a Republican governor had done this the left would be all over it. However, one of the reasons for this house to house searh in that neighborhood was that a suspected terrorist cell was harboring the fugitive. Both terrorist drove all over Waltham and Watertown for an hour, dense city streets, that only a local would have knowledge to navigate. They could have easily gotten on the Mass Pike and gassed up the car in five minutes from where the hijacking took place Allston. Who were the looking for or who did they meet up with in Watertown?


28 posted on 04/30/2013 6:30:50 AM PDT by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun
the police didn't ask them, they pointed guns at all residents and ordered them to get out of their house. here is the video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=B_Gb6i5DF9k&NR=1

the gov also ORDERED everyone to not leave their house and for no one to go in

29 posted on 04/30/2013 6:31:03 AM PDT by Democrat_media (s tMary Landrieu voted for the UN to take away our 2nd amendment rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media
Yep, it was a successful test. "Martial law demo? Check." I'd love to know who came up with the ROE for those house-to-house searches. Who were the main actors on those "joint task forces" that integrated DHS/DOJ/FBI/State/local LE?

Aiming rifles at Americans in windows is a very big deal. Dragging Americans out of houses German Nazi style is a big deal.

"Raus! Raus! Schnell! Raus!"

And Americans didn't object at all. Just wait for the "real" national emergency, and not just this little demo project. I'm sure the DHS/SA/SS is very happy with the placid sheeple response to Watertown.


30 posted on 04/30/2013 6:31:56 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Stuff like that plant the “seeds” for “revolt”.


31 posted on 04/30/2013 6:33:21 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

You open your borders, let in tens of millions of low-lifes and criminals, and this result is inevitable.

Liberty is not for everyone. That’s why we have jails. And locks on doors, and fences, and bank vaults.

It’s nothing new.


32 posted on 04/30/2013 6:33:52 AM PDT by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

If they needed to search homes because of the possibility that the terrorist was holding up in a home and was taking hostages, why did they force the inhabitants to keep their hands up at gunpoint and pat them down? Could the terrorist have disguised himself that well or have been hiding in someone’s pocket? The cops weren’t looking for the suspect, they were treating all citizens as criminals and conducting illegal searches.


33 posted on 04/30/2013 6:38:39 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

.....Yet the irony of it all is that it took a guy who wanted to go out for a “smoke” to find bomber number 2, right in his boat!


34 posted on 04/30/2013 6:40:03 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Who pays for the time missed from work?


35 posted on 04/30/2013 6:41:23 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: formosa

And what was amazing is how willingly the people in Boston were willing to give up their freedom and dignity. Being patted down at gunpoint under the guise of looking for a particular suspect?


36 posted on 04/30/2013 6:42:59 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: windsorknot
Some criticism of the manhunt may be valid, but how many Bostonians died or lost limbs at the hands of law enforcement officers during the manhunt?

So you're good with having your neighborhood locked down like a cell block and have a dozen or so men with sub machineguns remove you and your family from your home at gunpoint while they ransack your house... As long as they don't shoot and/or kill you?

37 posted on 04/30/2013 6:46:39 AM PDT by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I just can’t help but wonder how many FReepers would feel the same outrage if it were a civilian posse doing exactly the same with zero oversight.

Lord knows how much property civilian posses destroyed over the years, or how many searches they conducted, or how many innocents they wounded or killed, or how many executions they carried out without benefit of trial.

None of it was right but we need some balance rather than grabbing our crotches and screaming “police state!”.


38 posted on 04/30/2013 6:58:27 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Spartan302
We need a strong and capable police force for when the time comes, what we don’t want is that same force being issued orders when push comes to shove trying to enforce an illegal regime across the nation, or the prevent the people from correcting such political mistakes.

No, we don't need a strong and capable police force. When you get that, you boston only worse next time. 99% of them will follow whatever orders they are given. Ask one of them if they would have followed the orders to put Anne Frank on a train to the camps in nazi germany and watch them squirm to avoid giving you an honest yes or no answer. The real answer is they would load her ass onto that rail car. The laws of human nature have not been repealed. Americans are going to have to learn the hard way that the police are not their friends.

39 posted on 04/30/2013 7:02:35 AM PDT by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Stupid...foot in mouth . Sometimes you’re better off keeping opinion to self.

If you’re in the hospital deaf with your ears still ringing or looking at the stumps that were your legs. No you idiot it’s not scarier.


40 posted on 04/30/2013 7:04:19 AM PDT by Blackirish (Forward Comrades!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson