Posted on 05/24/2013 7:03:41 PM PDT by don-o
On Thursday, The Daily Caller published a story — “Despite momentum, GOP leadership still against special Benghazi committee” — that offers new evidence of the accuracy of two assessments long maintained by so many true conservatives:
1) The people who refer to themselves as the House Republican “leadership” are far more interested in their own big egos and little fiefdoms than they are in serving the best interests of the American people and protecting the national security of the United States.
2) When it comes to crafting and implementing political strategy, they are pretty much complete morons.
Most House Republicans — 153 — are co-sponsors of a proposal to establish a select committee to investigate the Benghazi terror attack. Rep. John Boehner and other members of the Republican leadership are pressuring co-sponsors of the proposal to back off.
Of course, they claim not to be. It must be a coincidence, then, that only two days after a May 14 joint meeting of the House Republican whip organization and committee chairs at which the majority whip and a very turf-conscious committee chairman stood up and denounced the idea of having such a select committee, a Republican co-sponsor of the select committee proposal who is next in line for chairmanship of the Oversight & Government Reform Committee — Rep. John Mica of Florida — decided to renounce his co-sponsorship. I guess Mica just suddenly decided, without any pressure to do so, that “it is no longer necessary to pursue a select committee on this matter,” an idea that only eight weeks earlier he had enthusiastically embraced. Mica’s reversal came as an avalanche of highly damaging facts surrounding Benghazi was raining down on the Obama administration. At the time, new co-sponsors for the select committee idea were coming forward at a rate of two to four a day.
Can you believe any of this? Me neither.
The Republican leadership also claims that the smarter, more effective way to uncover the truth about the Benghazi disaster is to have any and all committees that claim any bit of jurisdiction have a go at it.
What’s so wrong about this approach?
To begin with, the driving motive behind it’s wrong — disgustingly wrong. It’s far, far more about a weak speaker of the House’s desire to massage the egos and avoid hurting the feelings of a handful of his committee chairmen than it is about trying to protect the country.
It’s not smart or efficient to let several committees that can claim some chunk of jurisdiction — Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, Judiciary, Armed Services and Oversight & Government Reform — each go merrily on its own, each restricted to its own narrow scope, wasting time by duplicating effort so that the maximum possible number of chairmen and members can get a chance at some “my-moment-before-the-cameras” speechifying.
Darrell Issa’s committee has done some outstanding work so far. But by House rules, its scope is actually quite limited. Plus, as able a person as Issa is, it defies common sense to expect that he can do justice to Benghazi while his hands are full with the crucially important IRS investigation.
Obsessing over profile and lacking in courage, Boehner and the rest of the so-called “leadership” are, however inadvertently, engaging in conduct akin to complicity in the Obama administration’s long-running cover-up efforts. It’s an inexcusable dereliction of duty that they continue to thwart rather than assist the creation of the select committee that should have been created months ago.
Consider whom Boehner and his leadership group are fighting against:
More than 150 of their fellow House Republicans — that’s more than two-thirds of the GOP caucus — are co-sponsoring the resolution.
Family members of Americans murdered in the Benghazi terrorist attack back the resolution.
The Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, which represents 26,000 federal law enforcement officers including Diplomatic Security Service officers, FBI agents, U.S. Marshals, Secret Service agents and Border Patrol agents, has endorsed the resolution, declaring that it’s “imperative” that a select committee be created “immediately.”
Special OPS OPSEC, an association of more than 700 retired Special Operations officials, has endorsed the resolution and earlier this week slapped down the pitch by the House Republican leadership that a select committee would amount to a wasteful start-over. “A select committee could pick up the investigation from where it stands and apply the full weight of the House to get the answers we need,” the group said in a statement.
Compare the behavior of the GOP leadership with that of the driving force behind the select committee proposal, Rep. Frank Wolf of Virginia. Wolf has repeatedly stated that he doesn’t want to chair this committee and isn’t seeking to serve on it — he just wants it to happen. But Boehner and the other members of the GOP leadership are irritated by Wolf. It’s what Mark Twain used to call “the irritation of good example.”
Worse, the House leadership doesn’t understand that they are playing right into the hands of Obama and the left, who will scream about how the GOP has not just one, but five — five! — separate committees trying to make political hay out of Benghazi. That will give the media yet another excuse to focus not on the terrible facts about Benghazi but rather on the administration’s claim that Republicans are just out to milk a great tragedy for political gain.
There are lots of practical problems with the leadership’s preferred approach to investigating Benghazi, besides the obvious ones. For one, the committees would end up fighting over scheduling. Which committee will meet during the best time for TV? How can they make sure that everyone who wants to read his statement before the camera — scores and scores of members — is able to do so? Moreover, all of these committee hearings will make for boring television that no one will watch.
Finally, by insisting on this multi-committee approach, Boehner and Company risk alienating the Diplomatic Defense Service (DSS) officers and other federal law enforcement agents who so far have been reserving most of their criticism for the Obama administration. This could cause real political problems for Republicans.
Two days ago, the representatives of these groups made clear their contempt for what the House Republican leadership is up to:
When the questions involve the fatalities of two heroic SEALS, as well as the injuries of brave DSS Special Agents, every government resource should be committed towards answering them. We don’t kick heroes under the carpet because we find an investigative inquiry administratively inconvenient. … Our heroes didn’t take pause while confronting fatal risk. Congress should not take pause in confronting the need to properly investigate this matter.
The nightmare scenario for Republicans would be if this large group of former special operations folks got fed up enough to mount a Swift Boat-style media campaign to explain to leadership that “Country First” needs to be a code to live by, not just some bumper-sticker slogan.
How many days — not weeks — do you think it would then take before House Republicans would be forced by aroused public opinion to stand up and find some new “leaders” who understand the meaning of the word?
If the current leadership doesn’t back off and reverse course soon, this could — and should — be their fate.
Fred J. Eckert twice served as a U.S. ambassador under President Reagan and is a recipient of the U.S. Foreign Service’s “Meritorious Honor Award.” He is also a former Republican congressman from New York. He was selected to debate the case for President Reagan’s 1986 retaliatory attack against Muammar Gaddafi’s Libya by England’s Oxford University Union.
Boehner must go!
Yes, indeed. This must be about the ninetieth time that Boner has made it clearly evident that nothing good will happen as long as he is Speaker.
I don’t think he’s dumb. I think he’s corrupt, and probably being blackmailed.
I hate that it has to be the Republicans (politicians) to do what the American Media should do.
Well, Duh!
Why do the House RINOs keep the Sobber as their Speaker?
Exactly. If the Republicans say 2+2=4, it’s for political bnefit. If the press did it, at least it would appear neutral.
Good article.
Typical incompetent GOP leadership. Always seizing “defeat” from the jaws of “victory”.
As a result, I predict (and I don’t predict much), that the Tea Party and those conservative congressional candidates they support, will supplant the Republican establishment in the House and perhaps get rid of some of the cowards and incompetents of the Old Guard, self-serving GOP leadership.
We need fighters, not compromising cowards, to take on the hardcore Left that is the Democrat Party.
And God, if you are reading this, please take some of the Democrats who are ruining this country. The list is long but Hell ain’t half filled and Satan needs some new bodies down there.
WHy do evil men and women live so long, and the good die young? Reid, Pelosi, Conyers, Rangel, Waters, Schakowsky, Grayson, Sebelius, Markey, Durbin, Whitehouse, Warren, Anita Dunn, Axelrod, Jarrett, etc.
Well, if God doesn’t want to get involved, then we had better get off our asses and get involved in politics at all levels. Now is the time for honest conservatives to rise up and come to the defense of our country. Voting is not enough, organizing is a start.
Demand a Special Prosecutor for the Benghazi, IRS, AP and Rosen investigations, as well as Fast and Furious. Let’s give the Left and the Yellowback Republicans, hell, and take no prisoners along the way.
“leadership” now there’s a joke!
The entire leadership must go, including Cantor, McCarthy, McConnell
And of course, Bonehead.
The GOP is complicit. Yes Bhoner must go. But he isn’t alone. There is a lot of CYA going on in RINO land. People have a choice. Let them continue to tank this and spit on the graves of the dead...and ensure more in the future, Or not.
What’s with all the ‘incompetence’ type of evasion, like they tried using with the Stalinist tactics of the IRS?
This is not a matter of ‘botching’ an investigation.
It is a matter of COLLUDING with a coverup, probably the biggest coverup in US history, second only to Pearl Harbor, if Roosevelt knew about it in advance.
Eckert makes the same point I did in an earlier FR comment.
I’d rather have one committee with Trey Gowdy as chairman.
5 committees dilute the process in the same way that Romney was able to win out over the many conservative alternatives.
One strong committee forces the media to focus on one storyline. Gowdy is a bulldog, and he will get that storyline out.
All the dribbles from 5 committee ego-heads will just be ignored by the press and be called overkill to boot.
No argument there, 100% correct.
Not botched, but covered up.
I wish the Rats would pass on that dirt and expose Bonehead. I think that
Is the only way to get rid of him.
Did you really mean to say how do they keep the Speaker SOBER?
FAST AND FURIOUS
We want to get to the bottom of this.
We want to make sure this does not ever happen again.
BENGHAZI
We want to get to the bottom of this.
We want to make sure this does not ever happen again.
IRS TARGETING ON THE BASIS OF IDEOLOGY
We want to get to the bottom of this.
We want to make sure this does not ever happen again.
Let’s be clear.
There’s a pattern here.
McConnell makes my SKIN CRAWL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.