Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Thwarted: 'No Indication' He Will Win Back House (GOP stands at +5 for 2014 House Midterms)
Washington Examiner ^ | JUNE 18, 2013 | 11:28 | Paul Bedard

Posted on 06/18/2013 6:01:26 PM PDT by drewh

President Obama's nonstop fundraising for congressional Democrats is building a huge campaign war chest for next fall, but there is little hope that his party will win back control of the House and make Rep. Nancy Pelosi speaker again, according to an exhaustive new analysis.

But the report from the University of Virginia's Center for Politics also shows that Obama may suffer the fewest losses of House seats for a second-term president since Ronald Reagan in 1986, itself a big victory.

"While it would be foolish to rule out any outcome, there is no indication at this point that the Republican House majority is in jeopardy," said Kyle Kondik, the House analyst on Larry Sabato's Crystal Ball team.

His report suggest that the Republicans will boost their numbers by five seats in 2014. The average loss by the president's party in the sixth year of an administration since 1946 is 21 seats. Dwight D. Eisenhower lost a high of 48 in 1958, Reagan lost five in 1986, and Bill Clinton picked up 5 in 1998.

Sign Up for the Paul Bedard newsletter! Please enter your email address below to begin receiving the Paul Bedard newsletter. You must enter a valid email address in the field above! . The reasons for so little change, Kondik said, is that there are few vulnerable seats on either side and the the national political climate is "pretty neutral." He did warn, however, that if the scandals rocking the White House get worse, the Democrats could suffer bigger losses.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 2014election; 2016election; election2014; election2016
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: drewh; All

I don’t know if 2/3 conservative majority control in each House is possible after 2014 elections. But do patriots understand that if conservatives had that much control in both Houses that conservatives would have constitutional authority under the Constitution’s Clause 2 of Section 7 of Article I to override presidential vetoes? If conservatives had such control of Congress then Obama would practically be a lame duck president for his last two years in office, a lame duck president arguably being what the Founding States had intended by design for all presidents.


21 posted on 06/18/2013 6:27:33 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex

Damn straight.


22 posted on 06/18/2013 6:34:50 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: drewh

The vanishing point in that picture is where?????


23 posted on 06/18/2013 7:01:46 PM PDT by OSHA (One despises and wants to destroy the United States, the other is a dead terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OSHA
Please....what has been seen cannot be unseen....

and worse is that what has been thought cannot be un-thought

24 posted on 06/18/2013 7:10:11 PM PDT by spokeshave (The only people better off today than 4 years ago are the Prisoners at Guantanamo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: drewh
in 2010 the Democrats were down 30 million voters from their high in 2008. The Republicans were only down 15 million voters from that last election.

The Republicans won in a record landslide that left them in control of the House and 30 state houses and legislatures.

The GOP-e, then showed how much they relished that vote by convincing their friends on the RNC to fire the chairman.

They then subsequently lost again to Obama, didn't win the Senate, and almost lost the House.

If we have to go into the 2014 election with the current RNC leadership, we may very well lose it!

25 posted on 06/18/2013 7:26:29 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh
...the Republicans will boost their numbers by five seats

"Nanner, manner, boo-boo"

26 posted on 06/18/2013 7:43:02 PM PDT by Slyfox (Without the Right to Life, all other rights are meaningless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Believe it or not, the GOP could actually pick up a House seat In Minnesota of all places.

Collin Peterson is the ranking minority member of the Ag Committee (also a former chair when the Dems controlled the House) and a member of the House since 1990. There has been talk of him retiring in 2014.

His district has a fairly good GOP lean to it - although Dems can do well because of a fairly large number of farmers who buy into the old Grange/Farmer Labor/Non-Partisan League crap.

The district voted in favor of a gay marriage ban and for voter ID in the 2012 elections. it has a socially conservative bent to it. Mitt Romney won the district in 2012 as well.

For those of you geographically inclined, here’s a map of the district:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mn07_108.jpg


27 posted on 06/18/2013 7:53:45 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Michael Steel was an idiot and had very little to do with the rise of the tea parties which brought the victories of 2010.

Two weeks after he spoke at our county dinner, he said white Republicans were scared of him. I had a picture of him with my wife and I on my refrigerator demonstrating how scared we were.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/67009-steele-white-republicans-are-scared-of-me

As the Republican chairman the least he could have done was raise Republican’s image with Blacks and instead he crapped on it.

Republicans have a lot of faults but don’t hold Steele up as a blameless sacrificial lamb he was an immense incompetent.


28 posted on 06/18/2013 8:13:20 PM PDT by sgtyork (The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage. Thucydides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Pass amnesty and the Democrats will win the House by 40-plus votes.


29 posted on 06/18/2013 8:19:08 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

“I never ever want to see Nancy Pelosi in the Speakers Chair again, but By God I do not want to see Boehner there either.”

Personally, I’d like to see both of them in pine box! Due to natural causes of course.


30 posted on 06/18/2013 9:28:55 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

” Obama would practically be a lame duck president for his last two years in office,”

Which would mean that he and his pet monkey would try to bankrupt the country with their vacations.


31 posted on 06/18/2013 9:31:35 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: vette6387; All

Given that Congress has the constitutional power of the purse, a conservative supermajority in Congress could override Obama’s vetoes, grounding Obama while they impeach him.


32 posted on 06/18/2013 9:38:52 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sgtyork
And..... you notice, that in the end the white Republicans running the party decided they were skeered of him and fired him.

I don't have to defend anything he did to note this ~ while he was RNC chairman we had the greatest victory in 70 years. Since he's been gone we've lost with another GOP-e candidate, and our Congressional victories have not been nearly as magniicent.

So, just maybe, whatever Mike didn't do is the thing the RNC chairman ought to be not doing.

33 posted on 06/19/2013 7:43:24 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Just before the election we were told by pollsters Obama was losing. When we’re told Obama won’t have a majority after mid-terms, I don’t trust that info.


34 posted on 06/19/2013 2:07:55 PM PDT by jyro (French-like Democrats wave the white flag of surrender while we are winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jyro

Personally, I remember that most polls were heavily over-sampling Dems, & as a result we didn’t believe them. It turned out that they were correct - they knew they’d be able to pull all the blacks & low-fo voters to elect the cool guy. Well, the cool guy wasn’t on the ballot in 2010 & all those new voters didn’t turn out. They won’t turn out in 2014 either, most likely. We ought to be able to make some headway in both the House & Senate if we can come up with some decent candidates.


35 posted on 06/19/2013 2:50:10 PM PDT by Twotone (Marte Et Clypeo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson